Inflectra Rapise vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th), Test Automation Tools (22nd)
Selenium HQ
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (5th), Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Regression Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.1%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Selenium HQ is 4.9%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Regression Testing Tools
Unique Categories:
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
0.1%
Functional Testing Tools
4.1%
 

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 4, 2024
The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product
Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.
HA
Dec 5, 2022
Open-source and easy to set up but can be challenging to learn
Maybe they could improve the record and play plugin for element detection. That would be ideal. If they could build some tools above Selenium for that, I'd find it helpful. People sometimes do not have that much technical knowledge, and having something more plug-and-play would be appealing. We have many plans in our pipeline that still need to be implemented. Maybe we will find that we need some features that need to be integrated with Selenium, for example, for a multi-browser or for implementing many machines. We haven't fully implemented this solution yet. The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn. You need resources and technical knowledge and have to deal with the maintenance of script changes. While it works well with Chrome, if you use it with other browsers, you may have issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."
"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"The solution is very easy to use. Once you learn how to do things, it becomes very intuitive and simple."
"All the features in Selenium to automate the UI."
"My customer previously validated every file and it would take almost 15-20 minutes for a document. They used to randomly select and test only 100 out of the thousands, maybe 85,000, files, to pick up sampling. Each file would take around 20 to 25 minutes, so we were not able to do it manually, but with the help of Selenium, we were able to test all the files in two days. It saves a lot of time."
"It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages."
"Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run."
"Data parametrization and parallelization are the most important features in any automation tool."
"Ability to integrate with every other tool."
"I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support."
 

Cons

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"It would be better if it accommodated non-techy end-users. I think it's still a product for developers. That's why it's not common for end-users, and especially for RPA activities or tasks. It's hard to automate tasks for end-users. If it will be easier, more user-friendly, and so on, perhaps it can be more interesting for this kind of user."
"The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing."
"I have found that at times the tool does not catch the class features of website content correctly. The product's AWS configuration is also hard."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
"I don't have that much experience with it, but I know that Selenium is more used for websites. It is not for testing desktop applications, which is a downside of it. It can support desktop applications more."
"Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a lot of additional scripts required if you want to handle a single page application in a neat way."
"It does require a programming skill set. I would like the product not to require a heavy programming skill set and be more user-friendly for someone without a programming background."
"When we upgrade the version, some features are missing. I want the product to include some AI capabilities."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."
"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."
"The solution is open source."
"It is free."
"It is an open-source product, it is free for anyone to use."
"We are using Selenium open-source, so there is no need to purchase anything."
"Selenium HQ costs around $1000 per month, which is a bit high based on what they're offering."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"Selenium HQ is open source and our use of it in our company is provided for free."
"It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?
I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.
What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?
Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies a...
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
 

Also Known As

Rapise
SeleniumHQ
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Selenium HQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.