Integrated well and had a single pane of glass, but downtime and pricing were issues for usWhen we rolled it out, adoption was very quick. We migrated our email and other things to OneLogin, so adoption was very quick. The gateway became OneLogin, so if you wanted to get your email or anything else, you had to go through OneLogin to get it. It was quick and easy once we turned things on. Even the engineer who assisted us was very helpful. Once we turned it on, the users seamlessly started using OneLogin. They were redirected every time from others, and that ensured that there were no loopholes in what we were implementing. We had a single pane of glass for access management across the organization, but the caveat is that for managing users provisioning and deprovisioning, apps have to support that feature. This single pane of glass was very important because we eliminated ghost accounts that were not being used. We had no idea about them. After implementing OneLogin, when a user left, the deletion used to happen everywhere, so the licensing cost and all those things came down. Audit logs came in one place, so we had all the control. That improved our visibility a lot. The single pane of glass for access management enabled collaborative work between IT and Security. It simplified a lot of information for Security, and for IT, it simplified their setup process. For example, they would set up automatic provisions for emails, security training, etc. They would then just set up the user on OneLogin, and automatic provisioning would be done for them. When a user left, the user was removed automatically. That cleaned up things for us and improved processes. OneLogin 100% helped to free up time for our IT team. The main work we did was setting up automatic provisioning. We reduced our time from five to ten minutes in creating a user to doing it in an instance. For example, creating a user and assigning it on OneLogin to a department, such as IT, automatically moved them to groups and email groups on Gmail. That was no longer manual. They were just writing out the information that was given, and in the backend, it got mapped correctly to what was needed. That saved time for us. OneLogin enabled us to securely manage a growing user base or more applications with a smaller IT staff. After implementing OneLogin, we just had to work on one main platform. We did not fully need administrators for other systems. We worked in a hybrid environment. Because OneLogin was available everywhere, it improved the user experience when working remotely. It was a secure way to get to applications. They went through the OneLogin system to get to their apps. However, when everything is under a single pane of glass, there is a risk. If one user gets breached, we have a problem there. For example, I am an administrator, and my account can be breached. The mitigation would be setting up MFA. We needed to put such checks and balances.
