Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jira vs QuickBase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Jira offers cost savings and efficiency with initial setup costs, yielding qualitative benefits despite varying feedback on plugin support.
Sentiment score
7.1
QuickBase delivers significant financial benefits by reducing costs, increasing productivity, improving efficiency, and enhancing business visibility.
It's always hard to measure ROI precisely, but overall, the development time usually pays off within a year through efficiency gains.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Jira's customer service is well-regarded for online resources, though some desire faster email responses and phone support.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase customer service excels in quick technical support with extensive resources, despite limited weekend support and occasional delays.
Jira's customer support is one of the best I have ever dealt with because they respond quickly.
I did not face any issues with stability or upgrades.
Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Jira effectively supports large teams and user bases with customization options, despite some challenges like hardware needs and costs.
Sentiment score
7.7
QuickBase is highly scalable, efficiently managing growth in users and data, with strong support for expanding applications.
Scalability for Jira is great, and it handles growth easily from 100 to thousands.
Quick Base has high potential to scale.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Users praise Jira's reliability and smooth operation, noting occasional issues are often linked to server constraints or customization.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase is stable with minor disruptions, rated highly by users for reliability and timely maintenance communication.
 

Room For Improvement

Jira users cite difficulties with customization, usability, performance, integrations, native features, scalability, and desire improved reporting and administration.
QuickBase requires better customization, UI, mobile experience, improved reporting, integrations, security, formulas, training, APIs, and cost management.
Focus more on improving API integration and automation tools, not just the design.
To improve Jira, maybe some AI features could be added.
The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub.
 

Setup Cost

Jira's pricing is affordable for small teams but escalates significantly with increased users and plugin needs for enterprises.
Enterprise buyers appreciate QuickBase's flexible pricing, but costs rise with users; negotiating tailored solutions is advised for large enterprises.
Even if only five people from your team use a financial plugin, you still pay for all 100 seats.
Pricing could be cheaper.
 

Valuable Features

Jira excels in customization, agile support, and integration, offering flexible workflows, robust reporting, and comprehensive project management features.
QuickBase provides code-free app creation, customization, and efficient data management, enhancing operational efficiency with PaaS capabilities and API integrations.
You can build your own workflows and make it work exactly the way your team needs and integrate it with almost every third-party software.
One of the valuable features of Quick Base is its ability to function as a content management system without the need for SQL.
 

Categories and Ranking

Jira
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
276
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (1st), Project Management Software (1st)
QuickBase
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (18th), Low-Code Development Platforms (14th), Employee Time Tracking Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Jira and QuickBase aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Jira is designed for Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites and holds a mindshare of 16.0%, down 22.9% compared to last year.
QuickBase, on the other hand, focuses on Rapid Application Development Software, holds 1.6% mindshare, up 1.2% since last year.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Jira16.0%
Microsoft Azure DevOps11.9%
Codebeamer8.6%
Other63.5%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
QuickBase1.6%
Microsoft Power Apps11.8%
ServiceNow9.2%
Other77.4%
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Nathan Akimoff - PeerSpot reviewer
Has customized workflows to fit internal processes and improved overall team organization
I don't have a particular customization or integration that's been especially valuable for my team, but I experienced integrating Jira and QuickBooks, which was very challenging, but it really impacted the efficiency of the whole company. I have been working with Jira for over 12 years, and I've seen it grow every year. It's a powerful product, but lately, I think Atlassian has been adding too many simplified features that look nice but don't offer the same level of flexibility, and made some fields not available through the API, which is kind of frustrating. If I could make one suggestion, it would be to focus more on improving API integration and automation tools, not just the design.
Bhavatha Ranjanni S - PeerSpot reviewer
Its extensive scope allows multiple users with diverse professional backgrounds to engage on a single platform
When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants. The recent changes have increased costs based on user activity, such as viewing reports or interacting with specific fields. This shift makes QuickBase more expensive to use as activity increases. Lowering these costs could potentially broaden QuickBase's user base, similar to how Microsoft PowerApps operates. The visualization in QuickBase could be enhanced. Due to cost and usage efficiency concerns, our utilization of QuickBase is limited within our company. A few individuals are currently utilizing QuickBase. We need to consider the cost-to-usage ratio and prioritize increasing adoption.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
8%
University
7%
Performing Arts
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business104
Midsize Enterprise56
Large Enterprise149
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?
We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Jira Software
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: October 2025.
873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.