Check Point Remote Access VPN vs N-able Take Control comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Remote Access
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (6th)
N-able Take Control
Ranking in Remote Access
19th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 2.1%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able Take Control is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Remote Access
Unique Categories:
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
4.6%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Ozan Durmus - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 7, 2023
Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve
The deployment takes around two to three hours. If you manage the product, one person could be enough, but if you need some kind of additional integrations like ADA integration, you need someone from ADT to access products. One person is enough, but one or two additional personnel may be included. To deploy Check Point Remote Access VPN, you must purchase a license, enable the blade, and purchase client access licenses. You can then follow the instructions to deploy the product, write the necessary rules, make the integrations, deploy the agent to the clients, and provide them with a login solution. I rate the initial setup an eight on a scale of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
GH
Nov 17, 2021
Valuable remote access feature, highly stable, and scalable
There are multiple Take Controls, but I am using N-able Take Control as part of my dashboard. I don't use it in remote access to repair N-able Take Control has saved me a lot of time driving back and forth to the customer's site. I do not need to do this by using the solution. The most valuable…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For us, it was essential to integrate with Active Directory, which is our credentials repository."
"Setting policies allow, block, and limit users' access."
"Once we install and connect the VPN service, it keeps on running until we disconnect."
"One feature that is highly valued by our clients in remote access VPN is the IPsec suite. With IPsec, we can encrypt our data, ensuring that no one can perform a man-in-the-middle attack or decrypt the data. It utilizes powerful mathematical calculations and end-to-end encryption, preventing hacking attempts."
"The policies are easy to use."
"The safety of online interactions when working with this product has enabled members to convene productive meetings without fear of being attacked."
"Access is browser-based only and requires no additional client installation."
"It is a scalable solution...The technical support team of the solution is very good."
"Take Control enables you to collaborate with end users. It's for supporting a workstation where you want the person on the other side to see you moving their mouse, and you can work with them."
"The most valuable part of N-able Take Control is being able to remotely access your customer's site. You are able to view their network. Once you have it set up, it's always available. N-able Take Control can be used even when other remote access controls have been made."
 

Cons

"There needs to be a way to create a VPN client specific to our environment so that we can easily lock down who can connect."
"The authentication that we handle is through a .p12 certificate, however, we have integrated it with a 2MFA service through another provider. Something that could improve Check Point is if it had its own 2MFA service through a blade or some sort of application."
"Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN's enterprise support could be improved."
"We are very happy with the Windows client. You log in with the VPN for the full client, you do the log in there. But for Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. It is important because we have some users that use Linux and they don't have a specific application from Check Point to use. That is something that could be improved."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN handles up to a hundred megabytes for clients, but I want it to be able to handle up to one gigabyte."
"The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately."
"It's difficult to configure on Linux workstations as Check Point Remote VPN clients support only Windows and Mac devices."
"The dashboards I do not use because there are issues. The solution monitors your antivirus and other programs but it does not seem to work well."
"We've seen some latency problems in AWS environments. Aside from that, it's a pretty solid service."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is good."
"There is a license required for this solution."
"Organizations that already have the Check Point NGFW need to purchase an additional license to have access to the VPN functionality."
"The solution is pretty expensive. The rating is an eight."
"I give the price of the solution a five out of ten."
"My company makes yearly payments only towards the licensing costs attached to Check Point Remote Access VPN, as there are no extra costs attached to the product."
"I can say that the licensing costs are charged annually."
"My understanding is that the pricing and licensing are very competitive, and it's not one of their more expensive products. We buy licenses for the solution and have licenses for the endpoint servers."
"N-able Take Control charges you a monthly fee for every customer that you have booked in, and it used to be inexpensive but it's a little bit more expensive now."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
21%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Construction Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect. They are in our cloud and our premise data center.
What do you like most about N-able Take Control?
Take Control enables you to collaborate with end users. It's for supporting a workstation where you want the person on the other side to see you moving their mouse, and you can work with them.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able Take Control?
It's bundled with N-central, but there's a separate option if you only want Take Control.
What needs improvement with N-able Take Control?
We've seen some latency problems in AWS environments. Aside from that, it's a pretty solid service.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
SolarWinds MSP Take Control, SolarWinds MSP Anywhere, SolarWinds Take Control
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Bainbridge Technology Solutions, NKIT Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. N-able Take Control and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.