Veracode vs Wiz comparison

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2024

Veracode and Wiz have both received positive feedback on customer service and support. Wiz users have consistently praised data security and exposure prevention capabilities. Veracode users have found the pricing to be a key consideration, while Wiz users have focused on the ROI achieved. Both platforms have areas for improvement highlighted by users, with Veracode users mentioning the need for customizable reporting features, and Wiz users suggesting enhancements to advanced analytics tools.

Features: Veracode excels in accurate vulnerability detection, comprehensive security testing, and detailed reporting. In comparison, Wiz is praised for its intuitive interface, cloud security posture management, workload protection, vulnerability management, and agentless scanning.
Pricing and ROI: Veracode's setup cost is perceived as varying, with some reviewers considering it expensive while others find it reasonable. Wiz users appreciate the affordability, ease of installation, and licensing terms. Veracode focuses on preventing security breaches, reducing development costs, and maintaining certifications, while Wiz focuses on actionable insights.
Room for Improvement: Veracode users suggest improving the UI, customization, reporting, pricing transparency, and training resources. Wiz users highlight the need for more customization, clearer instructions, faster support, additional features, enhanced mobile app, robust reporting, system stability, and minimized downtime.
Deployment and customer support: Veracode users found the setup straightforward, with minimal technical skills needed. Wiz users had mixed experiences, some spent a significant amount of time on deployment and setup. Veracode's customer service has mixed reviews, with some praising responsiveness while others criticize slow response times. On the other hand, Wiz's customer service is consistently excellent, with users praising helpfulness and quick issue resolution.

The summary above is based on 190 interviews we conducted recently with Veracode and Wiz users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Veracode vs. Wiz Report (Updated: May 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Veracode vs. Wiz

May 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,817 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 2.9%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wiz is 22.9%, up from 14.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Unique Categories:

Vulnerability Management

1.6%

Application Security Tools

10.0%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

8.1%

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

15.2%

Featured Reviews

Ankit-Agarwal

Senior Director, Global Systems and Cyber Security at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Apr 16, 2024

Provides offensive security, supports private clouds, and is reasonably priced

We were looking for a CNAPP solution that could provide details about cloud misconfigurations, compliance, and any risks. PingSafe provides that. The feature of offensive security has been very helpful for us. We only use agentless scanning. We have not installed agents anywhere. It collects data and provides information. We use PingSafe's Offensive Security Engine. The analytics features of PingSafe are something that other providers do not provide. They have scanning on the port base and simulation of attacks. It is a very helpful feature to proactively resolve issues. It handles verifying actual exploit paths and prioritizing breach potential very well. The proactive approach and offensive security have helped us to fix things in advance before they can be exploited. We were able to realize its benefits immediately. As soon as you configure it, it does its job. It takes a day to configure it and discover the assets. It is easily deployable, and it immediately starts providing inputs. PingSafe helped reduce the number of false positives. It also helps with our SOC monitoring. The alerts are reduced, and we are in compliance. We get details about how much we are compliant with different frameworks. It helps us to evaluate the risk posture as well. We use the reports to evaluate our risk posture. The proactive approach and advanced fixes reduce the number of false positives, but it is difficult to know if PingSafe has reduced our mean time to detect. PingSafe has definitely reduced our mean time to remediate. PingSafe has not had an effect on the collaboration among various teams because, in our environment, everything is done by IT, but we have visibility across all the domains. We can work together if needed, but it is not yet applicable to our organization.

Read full review

Deepak Naik

Chief Security Officer at Digite

Mar 18, 2024

It's a solution our customers trust, so when we share the report they know we've done our due diligence

The main benefit of Veracode is that we can deliver better, more secure software. Our customers also trust Veracode. When we share the Veracode report, they see that we have gone through all the due diligence. Veracode aligns with SOC, ISO, and other types of certifications. It helps with compliance that Veracode has all these reporting formats. The solution provides visibility at every stage of development. We have automated almost everything through integration with Jenkins. As soon as the developer commits, it triggers the static scan for the main branches. We don't need to trigger the scan manually or do a follow-up to see if it's done scanning. The solution saves time by reporting issues and recommendations that help developers fix the reported vulnerabilities faster. I estimate that it improved developer productivity by about 10 percent.

Read full review

reviewer2129682

Senior Information Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 15, 2023

The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing, so you can understand everything quickly

The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary. All the other reports look great when you try to create them. I can pull a report of issues for a specific project, but it's a CSV file with findings, which isn't helpful. I expect a slick visual summary that looks like what they have on the dashboard. They spend a lot of time making the dashboard easy to understand, but you can't get that information into a report for our executive leadership. We want to show them the trends and what we're doing. It's critical for our team to demonstrate the tool's value. At the end of the year, we have to go to a meeting and show management the progress we made this year. I can only do that by going into open issues, putting them all in notepad, and taking a couple of screenshots. I would also like the dashboards to be customizable. They have excellent dashboards, but you can't create or customize them. At the same time, Wiz seems open to that feedback, and I think they're relatively new. They're growing fast and implementing new features quickly, so I hope this will be added soon. A third issue is that we can't provide email notifications on connector status. Everything comes into Wiz through a connector. Our AWS environment is added as a connector, and there's no way to notify anyone if an issue is detected. We could wake up the next morning and not have any data from our AWS cloud environment because there was an issue with the connector, but no one would've known about it. I think that's something that needs to be fixed. Wiz has room for improvement in terms of risk assessment. It has a severity meter with five levels: critical, high, medium, low, or informational. If I click on the highs, it sorts the issues by the control with the most total issues. They're all high, but it doesn't prioritize based on anything other than the number of issues that are impacted by that control. It's not a priority. It tells you you'll get the most bang for your buck if you fix this one. There's no risk score or anything like that. For example, if a public-facing device has a significant vulnerability, it will consider that business context and label it "critical," but that's all it does. All the severity levels have the same weight. Wiz prioritizes well in terms of sorting the issues into broad categories. However, it doesn't prioritize those. I'm looking at all the highs right now, and I don't know if one of these is more impactful to fix than the other. It helps to have an overview showing that 103 resources will be impacted if we fix this control. We can fix the control at the global level, put guardrails around it, and prevent the issue from happening in the future. You can start thinking that way, but it doesn't tell you this is more severe than other issues in the same severity category.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."

"Cloud Native Security helps us discover vulnerabilities in a cloud environment like open ports that allow people to attack our environment. If someone unintentionally opens a port, we are exposed. Cloud Native Security alerts us so we can remediate the problem. We can also automate it so that Cloud Native Security will fix it."

"PingSafe offers comprehensive security posture management."

"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."

"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."

"They're responsive to feature requests. If I suggest a feature for Prisma, I will need to wait until the next release on their roadmap. Cloud Native Security will add it right away."

"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."

"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

"When we do have errors, Veracode is always available, their consultants, to help us either mitigate the error, or provide technical assistance on pointing exactly where the problem is and how we could probably fix it. I'm always amazed at how knowledgeable they are."

"The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries."

"The most valuable features of Veracode Static Analysis are its ability to work with GitLab and GitHub so that you can do the reviews and force the code."

"Static analysis scanning engine is a key feature."

"Another feature of Veracode is that they provide e-learning, but the e-learning is not basic, rather it is quite advanced... in the e-learning you can check into best practices for developing code and how to prevent improper management of some component of the code that could lead to a vulnerability. The e-learning that Veracode provides is an extremely good tool."

"Veracode provides faster scans compared to other static analysis security testing tools."

"Veracode's integration with our continuous integration solution is what I've found to be the most valuable feature. It is easy to connect the two and to run scans in an automated way without needing as much manual intervention."

"It is scalable and quick to deploy into the site and the pipelines. The reports and analytics are good, and the false positive rate is low. It gives true results."

More Veracode pros

"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."

"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."

"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."

"The solution is very user-friendly."

"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."

"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."

"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."

"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."

More Wiz pros

Cons

"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."

"PingSafe is an excellent CSPM tool, but the CWPP features need to improve, and there is a scope for more application security posture management features. There aren't many ASPM solutions on the market, and existing ones are costly. I would like to see PingSafe develop into a single pane of glass for ASPM, CSPM, and CWPP. Another feature I'd like to see is runtime protection."

"When we get a new finding from PingSafe, I wish we could get an alert in the console, so we can work on it before we see it in the report. It would be very useful for the team that is actively working on the PingSafe platform, so we can close the issue the same day before it appears in the daily report."

"We wanted it to provide us with something like Claroty Hub in AWS for lateral movement. For example, if an EC2 instance or a virtual machine is compromised in a public subnet based on a particular vulnerability, such as Log4j, we want it to not be able to reach some of our databases. This kind of feature is not supported in PingSafe."

"The reporting works well, but sometimes the severity classifications are inaccurate. Sometimes, it flags an issue as high-impact, but it should be a lower severity."

"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."

"We had a glitch in PingSafe where it fed us false positives in the past."

"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

"Veracode would benefit greatly from more training resources. The videos are great, but I would like more hands-on training writing a script, validating a script with a unit test in a different language, etc. That's something that would be very valuable."

"It needs to reach the level of Checkmarx's and Fortify Software's capabilities and service levels, or may further loosen the market share."

"While Veracode is way ahead of its competitors on Gartner Magic Quadrant, it's a bit more expensive than Fortify. It's a good solution for the cost, but if we had a high budget, we would go with Checkmarx, which is much better than Veracode."

"The interface is too complex."

"In some cases we use their APIs; they're not as rich as I would like."

"When it comes to the speed of the pipeline scan, one of the things we have found with Veracode is that it's very fast with Java-based applications but a bit slow with C/C++ based applications. So we have implemented the pipeline scan only for Java-based applications not for the C/C++ applications."

"The negative that I found is that it has a subscription-based model."

"Sometimes, the scans halt or drop for some reason, and we need to get help from Veracode to fix it."

More Veracode cons

"The solution's container security could be improved."

"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."

"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."

"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."

"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."

"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."

"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."

"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."

More Wiz cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical."

"PingSafe is affordable."

"Its pricing was a little less than other providers."

"Its pricing is constant. It has been constant over the previous year, so I am happy with it. However, price distribution can be better explained. That is the only area I am worried about. Otherwise, the pricing is very reasonable."

"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at."

"PingSafe is cost-effective for the amount of infrastructure we have. It's reasonable for what they offer compared to our previous solution. It's at least 25 percent to 30 percent less."

"The cost for PingSafe is average when compared to other CSPM tools."

"As a partner, we receive a discount on the licenses."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

"Without getting too specific, I'd say the average yearly cost is around $50,000. The costs include licensing and maintenance support."

"We are still considering it at the enterprise level. It has a subscription-based model. We find its price a little high based on the features it provides."

"The pricing for Veracode is high, making it difficult for beginners to afford."

"It is quite good. If you adapt it for the whole organization, it is quite affordable. The pricing plans are good as compared to the other competitors, and any small, medium, or big company can easily adopt Veracode. Its cost includes deployment, training, and support for one year."

"From a cost perspective, it seems okay, although we will probably evaluate alternatives next time it's up for renewal because for us, it's a relatively high cost, and we want to make sure that we are using our resources most appropriately."

"I know that Veracode is a semi-pricey solution. If you are serious about security, I would recommend that you use an open-source option to learn how the scanning process works and then look into Veracode if you want to really step up your game and have an all-in-one solution."

"Get a license at the beginning of a project. Don't wait until the end, because you want to use the product throughout the entire software development lifecycle, not just at the end. You could be surprised, and not in a positive way, with all the vulnerabilities there are in your code."

"It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

"The pricing seems pretty simple. We don't have to do a lot of calculations to figure out what the components are. They do it by enabling specific features, either basics or advanced, which makes it easy to select."

"I wish the pricing was more transparent."

"The pricing is fair. Some of the more advanced features and functionalities and how the tiers are split can be somewhat confusing."

"Wiz is a moderately priced solution, where it is neither cheap nor costly."

"The cost of the other solutions is comparable to Wiz."

"The pricing is fair and comparable to their competitors. The cost seems to be going up, which is a concern. There are potential savings from consolidating tools, but we're uncertain how Wiz's pricing will change over time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

I'm not aware of the exact pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting feat...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. Son...

See all answers

What do you like most about Veracode?

The SAST and DAST modules are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?

The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and da...

See all answers

How would you compare Wiz vs Lacework?

Wiz and Lacework sucks... Buy Orca.

See all answers

AWS Cloud Security Posture tool - has anyone used either Wiz or Ermetic cloud security products and can compare them to AWS Security Hub?

Whether or not the cost of third-party Cloud Security tools is justified would depend on your specific needs and budg...

See all answers

What do you like most about Wiz?

With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment.

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 30% of the time

Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 10% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 10% of the time

Sysdig Secure vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 4% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 26% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 14% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Veracode

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs Veracode

Compared 6% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Wiz

Compared 18% of the time

Orca Security vs Wiz

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Wiz

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs Wiz

Compared 5% of the time

Lacework vs Wiz

Compared 4% of the time

More Wiz Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

May 2024

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Veracode

May 2024

Download Veracode product report

Buyer's Guide

Wiz

May 2024

Download Wiz product report

Also Known As

PingSafe

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

No data available

Learn More

SentinelOne

Veracode

Wiz

Overview

Singularity Cloud Security is SentinelOne’s comprehensive, cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP). It combines the best of agentless insights with AI-powered threat protection, to secure and protect your multi-cloud infrastructure, services, and containers from build time to runtime. SentinelOne’s CNAPP applies an attacker’s mindset to help security practitioners better prioritize their remediation tasks with evidence-backed Verified Exploit Paths™. The efficient and scalable runtime protection, proven over 5 years and trusted by many of the world’s leading cloud enterprises, harnesses local, autonomous AI engines to detect and thwart runtime threats in real-time. CNAPP data and workload telemetry is recorded to SentinelOne’s unified security lake, for easy access and investigation.

Singularity Cloud Security includes both agentless and AI-powered cloud security controls, which represent two halves of our strategy to keep public cloud and container environments safe. Radically reduce your cloud attack surface with Singularity Cloud Native Security, formerly PingSafe, with agentless insights and evidence-based prioritization; protect runtime compute and container with Singularity Cloud Workload Security, SentinelOne’s real-time CWPP, with AI-powered machine-speed blocking of threats.

Veracode is a global leader in Application Risk Management for the AI era. Powered by trillions of lines of code scans and a proprietary AI-generated remediation engine, the Veracode platform is trusted by organizations worldwide to build and maintain secure software from code creation to cloud deployment. Thousands of the world’s leading development and security teams use Veracode every second of every day to get accurate, actionable visibility of exploitable risk, achieve real-time vulnerability remediation, and reduce their security debt at scale. Veracode is a multi-award-winning company offering capabilities to secure the entire software development life cycle, including Veracode Fix, Static Analysis, Dynamic Analysis, Software Composition Analysis, Container Security, Application Security Posture Management, and Penetration Testing.

Learn more at www.veracode.com, on the Veracode blog, and on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Wiz is a highly efficient solution for data security posture management (DSPM), with a 100% API-based approach that provides quick connectivity and comprehensive scans of platform configurations and workloads. The solution allows companies to automatically correlate sensitive data with relevant cloud context, such as public exposure, user identities, entitlements, and vulnerabilities.This integration enables them to understand data accessibility, configuration, usage, and movement within their internal environments.

Wiz's Security Graph delivers automated alerts whenever risks emerge, allowing teams to prioritize and address the most critical issues before they escalate into breaches. Furthermore, Wiz ensures rapid and agentless visibility into critical data across various repositories, enabling organizations to easily determine the location of their data assets.

Wiz Features

Wiz provides various features in the following categories:

Agentless Scanning: The solution can scan every layer of a cloud environment without requiring agents, managing the entire process and providing comprehensive visibility.
Workflow Integration: Users can create customized workflows within Wiz to identify and assign actions based on urgency, integrating them with ticketing systems for quick and efficient remediation.
Vulnerability Management: Wiz's vulnerability management modules provide detailed analytics and visibility across cloud systems, streamlining the manual process of vulnerability discovery. The automated attack path analysis helps identify risks and trace potential points of exposure, allowing users to understand and mitigate them effectively and proactively.
CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management): Wiz's CSPM module offers instant visibility into high-level risks to an enterprise’s cloud environment, covering all accounts without the need for agents.
Out-of-the-Box Reporting and Custom Queries: The service supports comprehensive reporting with asset context, allowing users to perform complex custom queries on the solution’s user-friendly interface.
Automation Roles and Dashboards: The solution facilitates automation by providing essential roles and dedicated dashboards that enable teams to understand security information quickly, even those with limited expertise.
Contextual Risk Evaluation: The service contextualizes the various components contributing to an issue, providing a risk evaluation framework that helps prioritize remediation efforts.
Security Graph and Visibility: Wiz's security graph offers visibility across the entire organization, even with multiple accounts, enabling users to understand their environment and assets effectively.

The Benefits of Wiz

Wiz offers the following benefits:

Comprehensive agentless scanning
Effective identification and mitigation of vulnerabilities
Streamlined vulnerability management
Robust reporting capabilities and customizable queries
Enhanced automation and role-based access control
Prioritized risk evaluation for efficient remediation
Security posture across multiple accounts

Reviews from Real Users

Kamran Siddique, VP Information Security at boxed.com, remarks his company has seen a ROI while using Wiz, as it simplifies the process by integrating multiple useful tools into one solution.

According to a Senior Security Architect at Deliveroo, Wiz has given their company a fresh approach to vulnerability management, as Wiz's native integrations are extremely useful and paramount to the operational success of their platform.

Get a demo | Wiz

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

Wiz is the fastest growing software company ever - $100M ARR in 18 months: Wiz becomes the fastest-growing software company ever | Wiz Blog Discover why companies, including Salesforce, Morgan Stanley, Fox, and Bridgewater choose Wiz as their cloud security partner. Read their success stories here: Customers | Wiz

Buyer's Guide

Veracode vs. Wiz

May 2024

Free Report: Veracode vs. Wiz

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode vs. Wiz and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Veracode vs. Wiz report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.