Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SecurityScorecard vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.2
SecurityScorecard helps organizations identify and mitigate risks, enhancing decision-making and proactive security against digital threats and breaches.
Sentiment score
7.6
Tenable Vulnerability Management provides long-term cost-effective vulnerability identification and resolution, reducing operational costs and enhancing environment visibility.
The biggest benefit is visibility, allowing organizations to understand their risks, vulnerabilities, and potential threats.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
SecurityScorecard's customer support is knowledgeable but slow, with resolution times of 1-3 days and satisfaction rates averaging 7/10.
Sentiment score
5.9
User feedback on Tenable's support varies, highlighting issues with response times, accessibility, and additional charges for service.
They need better organization to support their customer volume.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
I would evaluate Tenable Vulnerability Management's customer service and technical support as average.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
SecurityScorecard is scalable for medium to large businesses but may not suit Fortune 500 due to scale issues.
Sentiment score
7.5
Tenable Vulnerability Management is scalable and cost-effective, supporting industries like finance and government with ease of expansion.
The product is suitable for medium to large businesses, typically with a revenue range from $200 million to a couple of billion dollars.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
SecurityScorecard is highly stable with a 99.99% rating; users report no issues, except minor MS Edge adjustments.
Sentiment score
8.1
Tenable Vulnerability Management is lauded for stability and reliability, with minor issues, rating between seven and ten.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improved support, better pricing, faster responses, mobile app scanning, and enhanced risk management features.
Users want improved interface, customization, integration, and support for Tenable Vulnerability Management, with clearer licensing and automation features.
There is a need for more active rather than passive third-party risk management features to truly mitigate risks.
I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
 

Setup Cost

SecurityScorecard pricing starts at $400/month, appealing for flexibility, though international users face extra currency fees.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is pricey but valued for features, with users desiring flexible, cost-effective pricing models.
There are more expensive and cheaper options available.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
 

Valuable Features

SecurityScorecard enhances security with easy reporting, vendor analysis, threat monitoring, and risk assessments using threat intelligence and breach insights.
Tenable Vulnerability Management offers comprehensive scanning and integration with features enhancing usability, scalability, and security compliance support.
It combines threat intel data with vulnerability information to increase risk ratings and provides insights into third-party supply chain risks.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.
It provides survivability benefits. It helps me understand if the system is capable of withstanding certain levels of stress.
 

Categories and Ranking

SecurityScorecard
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (3rd)
Tenable Vulnerability Manag...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (6th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. SecurityScorecard is designed for IT Vendor Risk Management and holds a mindshare of 10.9%, up 10.2% compared to last year.
Tenable Vulnerability Management, on the other hand, focuses on Vulnerability Management, holds 5.4% mindshare, down 9.6% since last year.
IT Vendor Risk Management
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Hadar Eshel - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services
Our organization relies on numerous SaaS services for critical business functions, such as CRM and monitoring solutions. In a hypothetical scenario where a security breach occurs in the CRM database, potentially exposing our data and our clients, SecurityScorecard proves invaluable. It provides a security score, typically a percentage, based on extensive data collection from various sources, including the dark web and social networks. Let's say our CRM solution receives a security score of 78%, indicating a relatively safe status according to the information gathered by SecurityScorecard. One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements. Additionally, it provides valuable insights into vulnerabilities within an organization, utilizing tools such as CVE details. For instance, it can assign a score based on vulnerabilities detected, such as 60%, and specify each vulnerability by its identifier. It offers scalability and can handle large volumes of real-time data. The continuous monitoring feature significantly enhances the ability to manage risks by providing real-time data collection on suppliers. We can observe fluctuations in their security levels over time, sometimes even every month. We can create alerts for high-risk situations, enabling organizations to respond promptly to potential security threats or vulnerabilities identified within their supplier network. The product's security ratings are helpful. While there may be occasional false positives, it does not function as a scanning solution. Instead, it presents the same information that hackers could potentially exploit. While I haven't worked with other cybersecurity rating solutions, I can attest to its strengths based on my experience. One notable advantage is their extensive data collection capabilities, surpassing many competitors in the market. They gather a wide range of information, resulting in a vast database that includes many suppliers or companies. It is easy to integrate with other tools. I rate it a nine out of ten.
Mani Bommisetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration
Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
861,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?
One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?
SecurityScorecard is priced in the middle range. There are more expensive and cheaper options available, however, Fortify Data and Censinet are also in the same middle range.
What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?
The product can be improved by incorporating more data points and intelligence around dark web information and threat data. Adding more features to combine and consolidate internal vulnerability sc...
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
I don't think I have any additional features to add for improvement, as Tenable Vulnerability Management does a pretty good job of what it does. My pain points would have been on the internal side ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tenable.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
Global Payments AU/NZ
Find out what your peers are saying about OneTrust, BitSight, SecurityScorecard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: June 2025.
861,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.