Rapid7 AppSpider vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) comparison

Rapid7 and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Rapid7 is ranked #32, while Sonar is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Rapid7 holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

1,416 Views
765 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...

Read 16 SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) reviews

6,912 Views
6,843 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Rapid7 AppSpider and SonarQube Cloud are competing products in security management and code quality analysis. SonarQube Cloud appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features relating to code quality.

Features: Rapid7 AppSpider provides dynamic application security testing and facilitates in-depth vulnerability scanning with a point-and-click user experience. It also offers authentication identification and customization for customer solutions. SonarQube Cloud provides static code analysis, continuous inspection of code quality, and integrates well with CI/CD tools. It includes comprehensive code smell reports and insights on hotspots which help in identifying potential security vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 AppSpider could improve in integrating with more engines, enhancing its automation tools, and refining its initial setup ease. SonarQube Cloud can enhance its documentation for CI/CD integrations, improve handling of false positives, and streamline its user experience to support larger organizations more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 AppSpider offers a flexible deployment model supporting both on-premises and cloud options, along with robust customer service. Integration is relatively simple, supporting various enterprise-specific needs. SonarQube Cloud provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment model with seamless integration, along with regular updates, promoting easy accessibility.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 AppSpider offers competitive initial setup costs making it appealing for budget-focused buyers, and its supportive features contribute to a good ROI. SonarQube Cloud, although more expensive, reflects a rich feature set that enhances productivity and offers significant value over time, driven by improvements in code quality and extensive integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is 4.2%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)	4.2%
Rapid7 AppSpider	0.5%
Other	95.3%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rizwan-Alam

Head Information Security at Akhtar Fuiou Technologies

Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable

One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions. This is the main aspect that I hope to see Rapid7 improve on. Beyond reducing false positives, I would also like to see them implement better reporting features, particularly in the executive summary type of reports which need to be user-friendly and easily understood by non-technical people. The recommendations and solutions on these reports could always be improved to make them more relevant, too. Lastly, the stability isn't that great, and sometimes it becomes non-responsive. I feel like the stability of the application is very average and currently needs more work.

Read full review

Archana Verma

Security Analyst at Dover Corporation

Provides valuable insights on code vulnerabilities and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines

I find SonarQube Cloud to be very user-friendly with an easy-to-use interface. It provides detailed code smell reports and insights on hotspots, which can later represent security vulnerabilities. It gives precise reports compared to Coverity and has a slightly lower number of false positives. It is integrated easily with the CI/CD pipeline, saving time and cost. It provides information on upcoming vulnerability details and loopholes that might turn into vulnerabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."

"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."

"The setup is usually straightforward."

"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"The initial deployment is very straightforward and simple. The product is stable if configured properly."

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."

"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

"For what it is meant to do, it works pretty well."

"SonarCloud is overall a good tool for identifying code smells, bugs, and code duplication, but we've found that using Android Lint is more effective for our needs."

"I find SonarQube Cloud very easy to use and simple to integrate initially."

"It is the best product we use for easy integration into YAML pipelines for scanning."

"The reports from SonarCloud are very good."

"Its dashboard provides a unified view of various code quality metrics, including code duplication, unit test coverage, and security hotspots."

"The solution can be installed locally."

"I'm not implementing the solutions. However, I've talked to the people who deploy the tools, and they are happy with how easy setting up SonarCloud is."

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) pros

Cons

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"The enterprise interface is too simple. It should be more customizable."

"One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions."

"This price of this solution is a little bit expensive."

"The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"The performance of the solution could improve. When I compare the speed it is slower than others on the market. There are some tricks we use to help speed up the solution."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

"I need a solution that can bring together three key areas: vulnerabilities, static scanning, and misarchitecture. Currently, to achieve our expectations, we have to use more than one product, as some products excel at scanning for vulnerabilities but are poor at checking code quality."

"We had some issues with the scanner."

"SonarQube Cloud needs improvements in dynamic code analysis. Static code analysis is good, but the product lacks dynamic code scanning capabilities, an area where Veracode excels."

"The UI can be improved. Additionally, in future updates, I would like to see SonarQube Cloud provide more detailed solutions for fixing code issues, especially solutions related to CVEs."

"SonarCloud can improve the false positives. Sometimes the gates sometimes act a little weird. We then need to manually go and mark the false positive."

"SonarQube Cloud could improve its vulnerability detection compared to Veracode. Additionally, it has fewer capabilities, which prompted us to use Veracode."

"There's room for improvement in the configuration process, particularly during the initial setup phase."

"SonarQube Cloud could improve its vulnerability detection compared to Veracode."

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"The price is pretty fair."

"The price of SonarCloud is not expensive, it goes by the lines of code. 1 million lines per code are approximately 4,000 USD per year. If you need 2 million lines of code you would double the annual cost."

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The price of SonarCloud could be less expensive. We are using the community version and the price should be more reasonable."

"The current pricing is quite cheap."

"Previously, the pricing was 17,000 euros for five million lines analyzed. However, they now charge $15,000 per one million lines, significantly increasing the cost."

"While not extremely cheap, it aligns well with market standards and offers good value."

"I am using the free version of the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

What do you like most about SonarCloud?

Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonarCloud?

From my experience, SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is very expensive for small companies. It would be a great improvement if the price for smaller companies were reduced, as I do not have th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonarCloud?

Sometimes, there are tracking issues. It has its own graphical GUI where we can track everything. Since most of our projects are open source, there are multiple features which can be improved. For ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 35% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 8% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 38% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 6% of the time

Semgrep vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 6% of the time

GitLab vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 6% of the time

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

August 2025

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

August 2025

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) report

Download SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) product report

Also Known As

AppSpider

No data available

Overview

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

SonarQube Cloud offers static code analysis and application security testing, seamlessly integrating into CI/CD pipelines. It's a vital tool for identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring code quality before deployment.

SonarQube Cloud is widely used for its ability to integrate with tools like GitHub, Jenkins, and Bitbucket, providing critical feedback at the pull request level. It's designed to help organizations maintain clean code by acting as a quality gate. This service supports development methodologies including sprints and Kanban for ongoing vulnerability management. While appreciated for its dashboard and integration capabilities, some users find initial setup challenging and note the need for enhanced documentation. The recent addition of mono reports and microservices support offers deeper insights into security and code quality, though container testing limitations and false positives are noted drawbacks. Manual intervention is sometimes required to address detailed reporting, with external tools being necessary for comprehensive analysis. Notifications for larger teams during serious issues and streamlined integration of new features are also areas of improvement.

What are the key features of SonarQube Cloud?

Vulnerability Detection: Identifies potential security threats within code.
Security Hotspots: Highlights sections of the code that require closer inspection.
Feedback on Feature Branches: Enables early detection and resolution of quality issues.
No Maintenance: Ensures focus remains on development rather than tool upkeep.
Mono and Multi-Reports: Offers diverse insights into code quality.

What benefits should users look for?

Integration Ease: Seamlessly connects with popular development platforms.
Continuous Code Analysis: Provides consistent feedback to improve code standards.
Unified Quality View: Dashboard offers a comprehensive look at code metrics.
Security Insights: Detailed information on vulnerabilities and their impact.

In specific industries, SonarQube Cloud finds application in finance and healthcare where code integrity and security are paramount. It allows teams to identify critical vulnerabilities early and ensures that software development aligns with industry regulations and standards. By continuously analyzing code, it aids organizations in deploying secure and reliable applications, fostering trust and compliance.

Sonar

Sample Customers

Microsoft

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

September 2025

Free Report: Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.