Ranorex Studio vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

3,795 Views
2,749 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 18 UiPath Test Suite reviews

1,538 Views
895 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ranorex Studio and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: May 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

May 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,817 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (12th), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.7%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 5.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Unique Categories:

Functional Testing Tools

2.9%

Mobile App Testing Tools

7.7%

No other categories found

Featured Reviews

reviewer2211588

Principal Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Jun 19, 2023

Provides good scalability but needs a user-friendly coding language

We use the solution for screen-based navigation The solution has its advantages, as it supports virtual machines. Thus, we can integrate it with the DevOps processes and Jenkins server. Presently, the solution only supports Windows. It would be good if it also supports Ubuntu, as we have tools…

Read full review

Gaurav Bharadwaj

Automation Lead at Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

Oct 24, 2023

Has robust features that requires further development in certain areas such as Desk Manager

We develop regression automation test suites for this purpose We are still in the early phases of development, but there has been improvement. We now have a better understanding of the various scenarios and test cases involved. The Test Manager stands out as the most valuable component. It…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Object identification is good."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

More Ranorex Studio pros

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"The document understanding is good."

"It is a very scalable product."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls)."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

More Ranorex Studio cons

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding languag...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

We have output arguments in the workflow. We are able to check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workf...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 22% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 21% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

froglogic Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 11% of the time

Testim vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 1% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 29% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 22% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 14% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 7% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 2% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

June 2024

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

May 2024

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Learn More

Ranorex

Video not available

UiPath

Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

May 2024

Free Report: Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.