Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LambdaTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (8th)
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.1%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
LambdaTest5.1%
Visual Studio Test Professional0.9%
Other94.0%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Dinesh Saharan - PeerSpot reviewer
The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users
I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.
ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides extensive extensions and plugins for seamless AI product development
Our primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional is as a development tool. We develop software primarily in Python, specifically for applications related to artificial intelligence. We use frameworks like PyTorch for training models and developing applications using these models. This tool…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."
"HyperExecute adds significant speed to execution, enhancing the overall testing process."
"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"Searching is extensive and helpful."
"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
 

Cons

"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."
"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."
"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is expensive."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."
"It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."
"LambdaTest is paid per execution."
"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."
"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."
"The pricing could be made cheaper."
"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."
"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."
"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."
"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."
"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."
"I think that the pricing is quite good."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is not an expensive solution."
"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."
"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."
"Our company pays a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?
We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?
The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...
What needs improvement with LambdaTest?
The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...
What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?
The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.