We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and LambdaTest based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: BrowserStack slightly nudges ahead of LambdaTest in this comparison. BrowserStack offers seamless access - users can use many different devices to gain access. Integration is good and the solution updates regularly to add new device options. LambdaTest is lacking in some basic features that other solutions provide and its performance can be a bit slow.
"I have found that BrowserStack is stable."
"It's helpful for me to test on different devices."
"We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices."
"I like that it offers full device capability."
"The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."
"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."
"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."
"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."
"Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."
"Occasionally, there are disruptions in the connection which can interfere with our testing processes, especially when testing on phones."
"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."
"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."
"I would like to see clearer visibility."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."
"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 19 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while LambdaTest is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". BrowserStack is most compared with Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, CrossBrowserTesting and Bitbar, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Perfecto and Bitbar. See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.