GitHub CoPilot vs OutSystems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OutSystems
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Low-Code Development Platforms (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

HappyBhalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 19, 2023
Helps with code review, test case generation, and chat features
In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results. If they could provide diagrams or basic design architectures, it would be easier to understand and take less time to review. So, as of now, image functionality is not provided by GitHub Copilot, and it would be great if they could add that. So, I would like to see improvements in the result generation, more results, different result formats, and image functionality.
Swapnil Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 1, 2023
A low-code solution that's easy to work with but needs some customization in the front-end
We use OutSystems for our customers in the banking and utility sectors.  OutSystems is a low-code solution. Most features are drag-and-drop, so it's pretty easy to work with. It thus helps the organization by saving time for developers.  The OutSystems Accelerator is the most valuable feature.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The solution increases coding efficiency."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"It is very stable."
"It is a stable solution."
"The scalability of OutSystems is very good, it scales automatically very useful for us."
"The solution helps to build mobile and web applications on SOAP and REST. You can integrate it with backend systems by submitting a code."
"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."
"We have no complaints surrounding both the scalability and stability of this solution."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"It would be useful if we could use the solution to create documents, not only prompts."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The dashboards in OutSystems could improve. There are a lot of tabs in the service center that can be confusing."
"The tool needs to improve the efficiency of its widgets."
"The solution is costly."
"Its ability to create and run automated tasks could be better."
"OutSystems could improve by being more like GitHub. It would be more helpful for us for division management and version control for our application."
"While I can't speak to the market impact, as a developer, I've seen significant reductions in development time across different versions of our applications. One area for improvement would be the UI controls in Service Studio. Sometimes, controls don't appear in the IDE, requiring us to check them in the web browser instead. Overall, our experience with OutSystems has been positive, though improvements in UI development would be welcomed."
"We'd like OutSystems to add stronger workflow-based automation similar to what Appian offers. It needs more workflow modeling and RPA features."
"I would like to see improvements in versioning. It can be challenging to keep track of what changes should be committed, especially when many developers are working in one environment."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."
"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The solution is costly."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."
"It's affordable."
"Pricing could be a concern. You have to pay yearly, even after you have completed your development."
"OutSystems is an expensive product. My company has to make monthly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution."
"For a single application, it's too expensive."
"The tool’s licensing is based on the user’s usage."
"OutSystems is a good solution, but it's not cheap."
"There is a free trial to use this solution and other options available, such as enterprise. There are different subscription plans."
"I believe they are very strict with their pricing platforms, or the pricing policies, and it changes."
"OutSystems is a very expensive solution, and it has to be cheaper."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Healthcare Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Educational Organization
27%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license.
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects.
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. OutSystems and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.