Fortinet FortiExtender vs Ruckus Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiExtender
Ranking in Wireless WAN
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ruckus Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiExtender is 0.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN is 32.4%, down from 38.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Jose-Rivera - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 3, 2023
A good WAN connectivity solution that allows access via a mobile connection, but carries a high price point
This solution provides secure WAN connectivity to the internet through the mobile network, while maximizing signal strength The port extenders provided by this solution allow us to reach the network through a mobile solution where, normally, access would be limited or unavailable. We appreciate…
Remigijus Klova - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2023
A reliable wireless network infrastructure providing seamless connectivity, scalability and efficient management for businesses seeking robust and flexible wide-area networking
It provides wireless networking solutions, including Wi-Fi access points and controllers The ratio of highest quality to value is the most valuable. The primary drawback is the absence of support for our initial client in Lithuania, especially in the field. We currently reach out to technical…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature will be that it works."
"For me, the best feature of Fortinet FortiExtender is its integration with an external solution such as a 5G LTE broadband modem, wired modem, and cellular network. I also like that the product can be integrated into one device or a unified device, and that is one of its best features because it allows you to manage and centralize the control of every device."
"The solution is extremely user-friendly."
"You don't need to have two different vendors to interoperate and get into comparability issues or inter-operability issues."
"The product is easy to use and easy to integrate."
"We appreciate that this solution can be used as an active secondary link as well as a backup."
"The initial setup was was just beautiful. It was straightforward."
"Management can be carried out from a central point."
"The best feature of Ruckus Wireless WAN apart from its seamless roaming feature where you roam beautifully on the network is its analytics tool that gives you so much insight into your deployment, so it has become more of a business intelligence type of tool as well. I also like that Ruckus Networks, in terms of WiFi security issues on the WiFi protocols, is also the first company to give you notices of security issues, and also the first to provide patches for those issues. Ruckus Wireless WAN is very proactive and much, much faster than Cisco, Aruba, and Meraki."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the size of the outdoor access points. It's great and you can disguise them quite well."
"The most valuable solution is its simplicity. The solution is simple and easy to use."
"Radio management is a valuable feature of the solution."
"The initial setup of Ruckus Wireless WAN is very easy."
"The most valuable features are the ease of deployment, the coverage that it offers, and the reliability."
"The feature I like most, is the product activity."
 

Cons

"What most of my clients are telling me is the price is a problem."
"The support could be faster and more responsive."
"Though Fortinet FortiExtender has some security features, the product could still be improved by adding features similar to those in FortiGuard, such as antivirus, intrusion, prevention, and detection, as well as web filtering features. The product is also not as user-friendly, so that's another area for improvement. In the FortiGate UTM solution of Fortinet, there's software-defined or SD-WAN, and in the next release of Fortinet FortiExtender, I'd like to see SD-WAN embedded in the product. Most of the communication in Fortinet FortiExtender is related to WAN and Edge, so having an SD-WAN function in the product would be useful for integrating and controlling WAN communication."
"The engineering of the solution has some negative points, especially in terms of troubleshooting. It's difficult to troubleshoot when we have a problem. It's not like other products like Cisco or Palo Alto which make troubleshooting much easier."
"We would like to see some improvement in the price for 5G models, as they are currently very expensive."
"There is a huge downside because we need to remove and insert the SIM to get it working."
"The solution would be a lot better if it was a little bit more intuitive. Additionally, the help menu would be a lot better if it was easier to identify the items that I was looking for. I find the graphical interface a little bit difficult to navigate. And I find the font that is used on the HTML interface not conducive to being able to be read in low light situations."
"I would like to see them make it smaller in the next release so that it has a smaller footprint for mobile clients."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"So far, I find Ruckus Wireless WAN okay in terms of the technology and existing business network, but licensing could be more flexible, especially the IoT license that was changed to adapt to the IoT Controller and sensor subscription. The previous licensing method for Ruckus Wireless WAN was better. In my opinion, it wasn't a good decision to change it because the customer prefers the previous licensing over the current licensing. It's not only about the money in terms of licensing, but also about flexibility. The latest license change isn't as flexible. I also found the cloud solution not partner-friendly, so that could also be improved. Another area for improvement in Ruckus Wireless WAN is answering partner requests because currently, it doesn't seem easy for them. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is the AP having its MQTT forwarder. Ruckus Wireless WAN AP supports IoT modules now and to use the IoT modules, you need all IoT data to pass through the IoT Controller. If I could forward that IoT data directly to my environment, similar to what you can do with other solutions, that would be great."
"The support could be faster. It takes time for them to reply."
"I would like to see the billing system improved by adding a billing system integration."
"Technical support is something that needs to be improved."
"I would like to have a better built-in reporting feature."
"The GUI interface of Ruckus Wireless WAN could be more usable, especially the drag-and-drop feature."
"Of course, we'd always like it to be cheaper, but that's for every product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not sure what the cost is. However, I anticipate that the purchase price will range between $2,500 and $5,000."
"I've only used the open-source version of Fortinet FortiExtender, but I know that it has some features that require you to pay for a license."
"The solution is not that expensive."
"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"In terms of the license of Ruckus Wireless WAN being cheap or expensive, it would differ based on your country. As I'm living in Turkey, it's expensive, so far. There is a big challenge about the chip crisis or the silicon crisis lately, and all vendors are fighting, so not enough equipment could be sold and the vendors must earn money, so it's very fair for vendors to push software and licensing to keep working and earning, so it's hard to answer a question on how cheap or expensive the license is for the solution."
"The solution is very competitively priced."
"Compared with Cisco Wireless WAN, the pricing for Ruckus Wireless WAN is two out of five. Ruckus Wireless WAN is twice the price of Cisco Wireless WAN."
"The cost of licensing varies."
"You have to pay for the controller with Ruckus, whereas with Ubiquiti, it comes for free."
"The product has competitive pricing."
"This is a wonderful product for the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
31%
Insurance Company
9%
Government
7%
Retailer
6%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiExtender?
The product is easy to use and easy to integrate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiExtender?
The solution is not that expensive. I rate pricing a six out of ten. The product has a yearly subscription. The clients must pay only for the license. They need not pay any additional costs.
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiExtender?
The support could be faster and more responsive.
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
What do you like most about Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Wireless WAN?
On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiExtender vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.