We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN."Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"It is easy to set up. You can do everything on the GUI. You don't need to trace cables. You don't need to connect to the switch. Everything is there, right in front of you."
"Its ease of use and flexibility are most valuable. It is cloud-based software."
"I like the status page Cisco added that shows you the health of the wireless connection."
"The most amazing part is that their Access Points have the ability to connect to multiple conference devices at different times, and it shows you the very in-depth Wi-Fi analytics through their dashboard."
"For Meraki, the ease of deployment and management is most valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the stability. It works and doesn't stop."
"It's simple to manage when there's a problem."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Tech support is good."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"What I like best about Ruckus Wireless WAN is easy administration. After installation, you'll benefit from how easy it is to administer the product. I also like that the product can cover the whole area with just a few endpoints."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"There are numerous features, but what I like about Ruckus is that they have a good coverage range due to their BeamFlex technique."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN’s most valuable feature is unleashed."
"Provides great coverage and performance."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"The price could be better."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Documentation could be improved, but everything else has been spot-on."
"It would be better if they enable full integration with Cisco's cloud-based network in the next release."
"It could be slightly cheaper but it's fine."
"I would like to see Cisco Meraki improve the accessibility by region level here in Latin America."
"The only thing that always causes problems with Meraki is the license. It's a bit of a bugbear with Meraki, and it remains today. So it's an unusual concept compared to the other products in the marketplace, but then it does cause a bit of a nuisance from time to time."
"It would be useful to have a service management platform integrated within this solution where we can measure the customer experience."
"The solution cannot be looked upon for one year or short term because you will pay back all the discounts they offer the next time you pay for renewal."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz."
"We had a problem with the delivery of the solution."
"Integration with AirMagnet, the design software, would be good because it takes the layout of a building and positions the access points accordingly, based on the areas and the construction materials."
"The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited."
"The pricing needs to be reconsidered because it's expensive."
"The pricing of Ruckus Wireless WAN is an area of concern. Ruckus Wireless WAN should slash its current price to match the prices offered by its competitors."
"I would like to see IoT device support available with WiFi six. IoT is used by all businesses. They are now using IoT devices. It is required."
"I believe there is room for improvement in the price structure."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
