Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exabeam vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Exabeam
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (15th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (4th), Security Incident Response (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (13th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (4th)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
SOC as a Service (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Exabeam is 1.9%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is 13.8%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

AYOUB ECH-CHKAF - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 10, 2023
An easy-to-use solution, but its data lake features could be simple to understand
We use the solution to investigate incidents and create rules for use cases The solution provides an easy-to-use platform to create rules for use cases. The solution's data lake features could be easier to understand for end users. They should also provide detailed information about detecting…
AYOUB ECH-CHKAF - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 10, 2023
An easy-to-setup solution with good technical support services
We use the solution for incident orchestration The solution helps us with incident analysis. The solution has the best processing and incident analysis features. The solution's price could be better. Also, they should provide integration with machine learning and artificial intelligence…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The setup is not difficult. It was easy."
"It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology."
"Exabeam Fusion SIEM has a good performance and more advantages than traditional solutions."
"The most valuable feature of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is the easy-to-use user interface."
"The solution's automation capabilities are great."
"The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"It is user-friendly and quite simple to use."
"It has an extensive list of integrations that are available out of the box which makes it easy to start."
"The repository of playbooks and the integration between Palo Alto and IBM QRadar are some useful features"
"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration."
"The solution is very reliable."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"The most valuable feature is its capability to automate responses and collect information for any security event before you even delve into the details. It's a vast product with an active roadmap, so I'm satisfied with it for now. It's very efficient at data collection and correlation."
"We use the solution to automate our SIEM tools and incidents."
"I have no complaints about Cortex's stability."
 

Cons

"Adding to the number of certifications that they have, for example, ISO 27001, would be helpful."
"They should provide detailed information about detecting phishing emails."
"The initial setup of Exabeam Fusion SIEM is complex because it needs to integrate with the SIEM solution, but after this is complete it is straightforward."
"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product."
"The solution's reporting and dashboarding could be improved."
"They need to focus on more of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and coverage. They claim they cover about 70 to 80%. I'm not sure if it's really quite that much, however."
"We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with."
"We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment."
"XSOAR could have more integration options."
"The user interface (UI) is quite heavy and takes time to load, which is a major drawback."
"We need a little hands-on experience to install the solution."
"The solution is complicated to learn."
"Corex XSOAR could be improved by reducing the time it takes to process large amounts of data and increasing the number of integrations."
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners."
"The integration could be better. Cortex, for example, does not work with iPhone."
"When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Exabeam is not a cheap solution."
"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
"The solution is expensive."
"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
"The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a nine."
"It is approx $10,000 or $20,000 per year for two user licenses."
"From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."
"The solution is a bit on the expensive side."
"The solution is based on an annual licensing model that is expensive."
"There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."
"The solution's cost is reasonable."
"The solution is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
What do you like most about Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
The solution's initial setup process is easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
The platform is not extremely expensive compared to its direct competitors; I would rate its pricing around six out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Whether the product is cheap or expensive depends on the company and how much they are willing to spend on security. Nowadays, security is important. The solution is not suitable for small business...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Recently, they started implementing microservices in XSOAR, which has improved quality and addressed previous issues. However, they should focus more on licensing costs. The user licensing fees are...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.