Automic Workload Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs comparison

Automic Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

Download the complete report

Helped 787,779 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Automic Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Redwood RunMyJobs

Ranking in Workload Automation

3rd

Average Rating

9.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of Automic Workload Automation is 8.1%, up from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redwood RunMyJobs is 6.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Unique Categories:

No other categories found

Featured Reviews

Bernd Stroehle.

Enterprise Architect at KosaKya

Nov 21, 2023

Offers excellent functionality, reduces job and workload failure, and enhances our compliance processes

Due to Automic Workload Automation's proprietary scripting language, upgrading it can be extremely challenging, unlike other workflow automation products that offer seamless migration. This inflexibility makes Automic Workload Automation the most complex and restrictive solution in the market. Choosing Automic Workload Automation essentially locks us into their ecosystem, making it nearly impossible to switch to a different product. Therefore, I strongly advise against using Automic Workload Automation. Automic Workload Automation's AI capabilities are limited. Most traditional workflow products lack robust support for AI workflows. Airflow might be a suitable option for AI workflows. However, if real-time AI processing is required, a different product altogether is necessary. For example, in the field of genetics, if a workflow involves thousands of jobs, traditional workflow products such as Automic Workload Automation may struggle to handle such a large workload. The maximum capacity of these products might be around 1,000 or 2,000 jobs. In contrast, a genetic workflow could involve up to 100,000 jobs, requiring a completely different workflow product specifically designed for such large-scale processing. Mainstream workflow products like Automic Workload Automation offer similar functionalities and are widely used around the globe. These products typically check for process completion every second. However, in high-performance computing and emerging fields like medicine or ophthalmology, we need to control thousands of jobs simultaneously, requiring millisecond-level process completion checks. To achieve this, we can store event data in databases or perform on-the-fly checks. Additionally, we need to integrate workflow control with workload management to prevent machine overload. These requirements make it unsuitable for tasks like controlling genomic workflows.

Read full review

Pooja P

Software Development Specialist at NTT DATA

Aug 8, 2023

Jobs can be scheduled, integrated, and automated easily

Redwood provides an advanced form of scheduler that supports multiple applications and workflows by automating the process. This makes room for innovation that helps users to innovate rather than perform a repeated process. This being a SaaS automation tool, we benefit from integrating with other…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it with automation, getting more speed to solve business processes."

"We use it to automate our business."

"Our customers appreciate it mostly because it takes a lot of effort away from them."

"The new release is web-based, so that's a big, big improvement. A lot of our products are going to that platform."

"The current upgrade process is straightforward. They have made the process much simpler. After we get to version 12 and any subsequent versions going forward, it should not require any downtime at all. "

"Automic is perfect to work with for a lot of job loads."

"The most valuable features are its robustness, it's highly scalable, and it's easy to implement."

"The night processing helps to have data just-in-time for the morning."

More Automic Workload Automation pros

"Redwood is of value to our organization due to of its ease of use and the ability to automate and orchestrate any platform that we utilize today."

"This tool helps us to monitor the job related to SAP modules."

"There are various ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your business needs and requirements."

"This program works with every browser."

"REL expressions are quite helpful for setting up the preconditions."

"Our team was able to integrate it with the ITSM tool as well as security monitoring tools to make the incident creation process automatically feasible."

"With automation in place, employees can focus on more strategic tasks that require human expertise, increasing overall productivity."

"One of Redwood Software's features that I liked was its event-driven automation, which allows IT teams to respond to real-time events, alerts, and notifications from numerous systems."

More Redwood RunMyJobs pros

Cons

"A little less button clicking, in the navigation of the tool itself would also help. There is a lot out there, and I understand that's what keeps the tool robust. It keeps our options open, but it's a bit click-y sometimes. To get where you need to go, you have to go through 10 levels."

"The direction in which the UI is going is concerning to me. It does not offer the security context we would need to implement future versions. While I see benefit in the Web UI, the security it would lack in separating a user's experience from an administrator's experience is an issue for us. MFA functionality is required since we're dealing with connectivity to the POS and for PCI/SOX compliance."

"Our area with the CA solution for DR is not really concerning directly to Automic, but to all of the DevOps, a word which is something that everybody is trying to touch on today in their daily business. There is also some gap that's a little bit hard to understand or to implement because not all the organizations are the same. When you are adopting DevOps, you may need to be more flexible in your processes."

"It would be better if it was easier to view the automated processes."

"From my point of view, the current product needs more stability."

"The hotline can take a long time. They will say, "I will take it and give it to the Level 2 support.""

"My biggest complaint is that there is no list price. We work with Oracle, Microsoft, IBM, etc., and all of them have list pricing. Automic, right up until today, has never had list pricing. This makes things difficult, because we need to plan budgets for the next year and can't."

"The web-based edition is missing a lot of the most important features available in Automic, we have absence. For example, when I'm scheduling a job, there is normally a flag that you can toggle to activate and deactivate the task, but that doesn't work properly in the web version. It's missing a lot of the calendar and scheduling features."

More Automic Workload Automation cons

"The price wise, it is not affordable. When we compare with other industry leading softwares and even the same scale, there are certain softwares that can compete with Redwood, but Redwood is very highly paced.So it is more SAP friendly, I would say, at this point. Since it was owned by SAP for very long time, they have made it SAP friendly. But if you look at the tool as a enterprise tool. Like, in general, it is not really that great as a tool. So you can you have better options when you couple it with SAP. But if you would like to control your enterprise level applications, anything after that, like, Azure AWS and things like that Oracle."

"The solution should have more focus on security standards."

"The dashboard provided can be made more visually appealing and could include more critical data that would help associates in one glance get the required information."

"The addition of machine learning capabilities could help Redwood Workload Automation Software better predict job and workflow performance, detect anomalies, and optimize operations based on historical data."

"It lacks some of the common reporting features. I'm a bit surprised that there aren't some standard reports to be able to extract any data on usage. They've described to us that customers have different reporting needs, so they let them develop those, but reporting is a common need. It would be helpful to have it as part of the solution."

"I have not noted any downsides."

"The product can improve customer service."

"Adding machine learning and AI capabilities would enable Redwood to automate more complex business processes and tasks."

More Redwood RunMyJobs cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I only know that AWA is cheaper than Control-M, but I'm not aware of the numbers."

"Its price is way up there with BMC. It is a little bit on the expensive side."

"The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."

"We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive."

"Our company had paid around 5,000 to 6,000 USD per license for a month."

"I'm not sure about licensing costs, but I know the base price is about $3,000, and you can get some kind of discount per node."

"We have received a lot of time and cost efficiencies from using the product."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Automic Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"It initially surprised me because we went from an application that was priced by connection to agents/the number of agents to an application that was priced based on the number of job executions. At that time, many of the products we looked at were also priced on job execution. That seems to be more common in the business or in the vendors that provide solutions out there, but that was probably our biggest difference."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Workload Automation?

It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automic Workload Automation?

The solution was flexible in terms of pricing. We're moving away from it, not due to price, but rather based on our requirements. They did provide us with an unlimited license that matched our budget.

What needs improvement with Automic Workload Automation?

The AI capabilities and predictive modeling aren't very good. I don't see a future for that. It's very basic. That's part of the reason we moved to Stonebranch. They have more analytic capabilities...

What do you like most about Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

In Redwood Automation, we can easily fetch the daily reports from the system as per the client's requirement and track the status of every job which is running, aborted, or canceled.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

As compared to Control-M and UC4, the setup cost and pricing of Redwood are far less as they are delivering good functionality at this price point.

What needs improvement with Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

There are fewer cons in Redwood as compared to other tools available in the market. That said, it would be a great thing if they would provide a few new features, like a health dashboard and a few ...

Control-M vs Automic Workload Automation

Comparisons

Compared 30% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Workload Automation

Compared 18% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Workload Automation

Compared 13% of the time

Dollar Universe Workload Automation vs Automic Workload Automation

Compared 10% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs Automic Workload Automation

Compared 2% of the time

More Automic Workload Automation Competitors

Control-M vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 51% of the time

Stonebranch vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 10% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 9% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 8% of the time

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 5% of the time

More Redwood RunMyJobs Competitors

Product Reports

Automic Workload Automation

Download Automic Workload Automation product report

Redwood RunMyJobs

Download Redwood RunMyJobs product report

Also Known As

Automic Dollar Universe

Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition, Redwood Business Process Automation - Workload Edition, RunMyJobs, Redwood RunMyJobs

Learn More

Broadcom

Redwood Software

Overview

Broadcom's Automic Workload Automation (AWA) stands out as a robust and advanced solution in the field of workload automation and orchestration. Designed for complex enterprise environments, it enables organizations to automate, manage, and optimize their IT workflows and business processes. This solution is particularly beneficial for IT professionals and business executives seeking to enhance operational efficiency, reduce manual workload, and drive digital transformation.

Automic Workload Automation offers a unified platform for managing diverse tasks across various environments and applications. This centralization simplifies the orchestration of workflows, enhancing visibility and control. IT professionals appreciate this feature as it allows for streamlined management and more efficient resource utilization. AWA's architecture is designed to scale with the growing demands of businesses. It supports a broad range of applications and platforms, making it a versatile tool for different IT environments.

AWA's analytics and reporting capabilities provide deep insights into workflow performance and potential bottlenecks. This aspect is particularly valuable for data-driven decision-making, helping organizations to optimize processes and improve overall efficiency. The ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide array of applications, databases, and systems, facilitates smooth and automated workflows across various IT landscapes, crucial for enterprises that utilize a mix of legacy and modern applications.

Automic Workload Automation users on PeerSpot.com have highlighted several strengths; IT professionals frequently commend its robust scheduling capabilities, noting that it handles complex dependencies and scenarios with ease. The intuitive user interface is also frequently mentioned, simplifying the task of managing and monitoring automated workflows. Business executives, on the other hand, appreciate the solution's contribution to strategic business initiatives, such as digital transformation and cloud migration, due to its advanced automation capabilities.

Redwood Software is a prominent player in the enterprise automation space, known for its robust and scalable solutions. It caters to a wide range of industries, offering tools for IT and business process automation. Redwood Software users on PeerSpot often highlights the flexibility and robustness of the solutions. Many users commend the platform for its ability to automate complex and time-consuming processes, which has led to significant time and cost savings. Additionally, the strong customer support and continuous updates are frequently mentioned, indicating a commitment to evolving with customer needs and technological advancements.

Redwood Software offers a holistic suite of automation tools, covering areas such as finance automation, IT process automation, and robotic process automation (RPA). This comprehensive approach ensures that various aspects of business operations can be automated, leading to increased efficiency and reduced manual intervention. Redwood Software is a cloud-native platform, which offers scalability, flexibility, and reduced infrastructure costs.

Redwood Software users shares that its user interfaces is intuitive and this is reducing the learning curve and enabling users across different departments to leverage automation tools effectively. The platform offers sophisticated scheduling and workflow capabilities, allowing for the automation of complex processes.

Redwood Software excels in its ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide range of systems and applications. This integration is key for enterprises that operate in diverse IT environments, ensuring that automation can be implemented across different platforms and applications without compatibility issues. Another important factor for enterprises, is focus on compliance and security, Redwood Software incorporates robust security measures and compliance protocols.

Sample Customers

ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB

AMD, American Home Shield, Avaya, Burberry, Centrica, City of Dallas, The Container Store, Core & Main, Daikin, Dart Containers, Deere, Energizer, Epson, Halliburton, Keen Foodware, National Gypsum, Rockport Group, Ryder, Technicolor, The University of Michigan, Virgin Money, Whitbread

Automic Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs