OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

OpenText and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 5.0, while VIPRE Security is ranked #58. OpenText holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

2,040 Views
1,816 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews

755 Views
619 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and VIPRE Endpoint Security are key players in cybersecurity, specializing in endpoint protection. VIPRE has an edge with its extensive features available for users seeking comprehensive security.

Features: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides automated threat detection, real-time protection, and quick incident response, making it suitable for enterprises focusing on speed. VIPRE Endpoint Security excels with advanced threat analysis, customizable protocols, and tailored security measures, appealing to organizations needing sophisticated solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers a simple deployment process with responsive customer support for seamless integration. VIPRE Endpoint Security provides detailed customer support, ensuring user satisfaction during onboarding and problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is budget-friendly with solid ROI for cost-conscious buyers. VIPRE Endpoint Security requires a higher upfront investment but offers substantial ROI through its quality features and services.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

58th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.1%
VIPRE Endpoint Security	0.5%
Other	98.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Shawn S

IT Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things like that instead. Our environment was big and I didn't feel like the console did a good enough job. We outgrew the product. I've been asking for a change for a couple of years now, and it finally got approved. In terms of the console, I had over 2000 endpoints in there and there wasn't even a search feature for me to look through them. If I had to find where a policy was I had to sort in alphabetical order to find an endpoint that I wanted. They need to offer a search function within the console - maybe something that shows a "last connected" notice. That way, it's easier to manage obsolete machines that you don't need anymore. They had a very vague setting, like after so many days, when do you want us to remove these, you'd see them. I just wish the console was a little more responsive when I would do commands. The reports could have been better. The product would show a lot of endpoints as not communicating. That was another pain point. We constantly had to run an SQL query to clean up the database as I would know immediately when I was in the console, that it just wasn't being responsive. I could tell I was being given bad data and that we had to clean up the database. As soon as I would clean up that database, it was like a purging of the SQL database and it would become a lot more responsive. The problem was that our environment was too big. We're going through a growth spurt right now. In the end, the solution is small and much better suited for a small business. We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for. The product is based on an older model of signature files. It doesn't use any artificial intelligence or anything. It was slow to refresh the policies and computer scans. The larger we got, the more it became an issue. If a company stayed small, I'm not sure if they would have noticed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."

"Doesn't consume resources or affect the computer performance at all."

"The solution has many features. It is very easy to define and set the policies based on the user groups, it does not take up a lot of resources in operation, and has provided us with a good track record of protection."

"Low performance requirements."

"The Webroot cloud console is very powerful."

"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

Cons

"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."

"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."

"We need more control over when upgrades to the app are rolled out."

"There should be a Webroot Business Endpoint Protection mobile app."

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

"Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is relatively cheap."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 21% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

January 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

December 2025

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.