Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Proofpoint Email Protection comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 29, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (3rd)
Proofpoint Email Protection
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Security Awareness Training (2nd), Office 365 Protection (2nd), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks WildFire is 18.3%, up from 15.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Proofpoint Email Protection is 28.4%, down from 54.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Security Awareness Training
8.1%
Office 365 Protection
16.7%
 

Featured Reviews

JeffReese - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 11, 2023
Well priced with great updates and competitive technology
Most competitors call themselves a layer seven inspection device yet are not in the true sense able to do this task as well as Palo Alto. Some require additional subscriptions to enable their version of a layer seven inspection service. Details as to how that accomplishes the tasks of layer seven inspections, how often their updates are published and available to the public, their method of publishing these updates to protect the internal production traffic, and the cost of the subscription, if required to fulfill the layer seven protection, should be asked of all vendors being considered. I have worked as a VAR and an MSSP and know that the labor cost of Palo Alto is much lower than its competition in every way.
Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 24, 2023
Easy to set up with good protection but could be cheaper
I use the solution to protect email. It's primarily used for security purposes.  The solution has improved the productivity of the users. It works in the background protecting us. The protection has been fair so far. We haven't had any issues.  It's easy to set up. The deployment is also fast.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"WildFire's application encryption is useful."
"For example, if a security Intel threat talks about an IOC. We can then go to our MSP and say, "Is there a signature for this particular type of malware that just came out?" And if they'll say yes, then we'll say, "Okay. Does it apply to these firewalls? And have we seen any hits on it?" There's absolutely value in it."
"What I like about Palo Alto is that it is a complete product, with everything in it."
"The most valuable features are all of the security features in terms of protection and SSL and VPN."
"The reporting feature helps our performance."
"The most valuable feature is the Automatic Verdict, to recognize whether something is a threat, or not."
"The most valuable feature for us is the VPN."
"Their technical support is outstanding and top-notch."
"Proofpoint Email Protection is stable enough and does its job of virus, malware, and email scam detection. Setting it up is not too complicated."
"Proofpoint Email Protection is a good product, and its most beneficial feature is the Threat Response Auto-Pull. I also like that it's an integrated email security solution."
"The setup was easy."
"The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are ease of use, data loss prevention, antivirus, and spam protection."
"The most valuable feature is the option to edit the inbound security."
"Proofpoint Email Protection's advantage is that, when it's working properly, it tends to catch more threats as compared to other products."
"Its anti-phishing functionality is the most valuable. Certainly, the biggest problem I have is phishing."
"The solution blocks malicious emails containing viruses and malware and reduces them out of spam."
 

Cons

"The initial setup was a little bit complex, mainly due to the GUI console and management challenges."
"They should make their user interface a little more user-friendly."
"The automation and responsiveness need improvement."
"The only problem with this solution is the cost. It's expensive."
"I think it would be nice for Palo Alto to work without the connection to the cloud. It is 100% powerful when connected to the cloud. But, if you disconnect from the cloud, you only get 40-50% power."
"The price could be better."
"The size of Palo Alto's cloud is big but it could be easier to use from a product management perspective."
"The product's false positive logs could be more user-friendly to understand. They could provide examples of precious cases to learn."
"The accessibility of Proofpoint Email Protection, particularly access to product trials, could be improved. It's hard to get a trial for Proofpoint Email Protection, and many customers prefer not just to do the POC or demo but try the product out."
"You only receive one model in Proofpoint Email Protection and the other ones you have to purchase at a high price. There should be more available with the solution and additional models should be less expensive."
"They do not have an on-demand scan for the internal viruses and internal users, and they don't have a scan for the exchange server against viruses and spam as Symantec does."
"The scalability can be improved, and the solution can be optimized."
"Proofpoint Email Protection could improve on the training. Every organization is different and to fine-tune it to block everything properly there needs to be better training. Sometimes it can block some of the information it shouldn't."
"Proofpoint Email Protection could improve the Mail Trace feature and make navigation easier."
"It has too many screens. It is kind of a conglomeration of products. In other words, they built product A, product B, and product C, and they are yet to integrate them into a single administrative console. I would certainly like to see a more seamless administrative interface. I would also like to see them include more bang for the buck, by including features like email fraud protection, rather than making their product so piecemeal, where you are buying little pieces. I agree with the idea of having multiple tiers or layers, but maybe as small, medium, and large, as opposed to an a la carte menu."
"Integration for reporting needs to be improved, it's too complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay between $3,000 and $4,000 CAD ($2,200 - $3,000 USD) per year to maintain this solution."
"The price is fair and comparable to other solutions."
"It is expensive, a feature more accessible to enterprise class customers, but provides an enhanced possibility that Zero- or near-Zero-day threats may be identified and mitigated. The cost of the product weighed against the potential impact of even one successful crypto malware-type exploit may justify the expense."
"The pricing is highly expensive."
"It IS a bit expensive, but I think you get what you pay for. Value is there."
"The licensing fees are on an annual basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard fees."
"It depends on the features. Additional features cost additional money as well."
"The solution is overpriced."
"The solution is expensive."
"The end customer is buying our solution, which can be for monthly or annual usage depending on our payment and business model."
"The solution charges per user per month to use it. There are not any additional fees in addition to the standard living fees."
"Proofpoint is fairly expensive."
"Proofpoint Email Protection has comparable pricing."
"The tool's pricing depends on the customer's preference, offering options for an annual license or a monthly subscription. The cost varies based on factors such as the number of users and specific requirements. Overall, the pricing is competitive."
"The solution uses a licensing model that is reasonable compared to other products."
"Pricing has recently been increased and the cost is a downside"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user206346 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 11, 2015
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto Networks
Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto: Management Goodies You often have comparisons of both firewalls concerning security components. Of course, a firewall must block attacks, scan for viruses, build VPNs, etc. However, in this post I am discussing the advantages and disadvantages from both vendors concerning…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
26%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall compare with Palo Alto Networks Wildfire?
The Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall is a very powerful and very complex piece of anti-viral software. When one considers that fact, it is all the more impressive that the setup is a fairly straightf...
Which is better - Wildfire or FortiGate?
FortiGate has a lot going for it and I consider it to be the best, most user-friendly firewall out there. What I like the most about it is that it has an attractive web dashboard with very easy nav...
How does Cisco ASA Firewall compare with Palo Alto's WildFire?
When looking to change our ASA Firewall, we looked into Palo Alto’s WildFire. It works especially in preventing advanced malware and zero-day exploits with real-time intelligence. The sandbox featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Proofpoint Email Protection?
The product is costly. I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price. When you want to change what capabilities you want in the product, yo...
What needs improvement with Proofpoint Email Protection?
The solution needs to integrate with the owner's labeling solution. Without this integration, the solution is not feasible.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Proofpoint Enterprise Protection, Cofense PhishMe
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation
Blocket, University of Waterloo, Lincoln Memorial University, WellSpan Health, U-Haul, Carestream Health, Westinghouse
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.