Oracle VM VirtualBox vs RHEV comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle VM VirtualBox
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RHEV
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
10th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Oracle VM VirtualBox is 8.8%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RHEV is 4.4%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

it_user418404 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 5, 2016
I can quickly create a portable working environment with applications. I can’t easily add or enable network ports without powering down my virtual machine.
It gives me the simplicity to quickly create virtual machines and to deploy my applications, and it's free. These are the most valuable features for me I can quickly create a portable working environment with all the applications running in my VirtualBox VMs. An example of an area of…
MN
Mar 11, 2024
Offers frameworks with well-documented API and easy to use
The cons are that you have extensive third-party support for Microsoft and VMware platforms that don't exist in the Red Hat world. Red Hat has some partners, but if your company uses something that backs up VMware on a block level, for example, those backup products often won't have support for Red Hat. They might just say to back up all your VMs as if they were individual clients, which isn't as efficient, even though it still works. The biggest improvement would be more third-party direct support for things like backups and provisioning through third-party portals. The framework is all there because the API is open and well-documented – that's what vendors who support VMware use. They could write their software to work against RHEV, but they're not investing in doing it for the Red Hat solution. So, that's the biggest difference between VMware and Red Hat. Microsoft's third-party support for Hyper-V is fairly decent.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This product is extremely easy to install, use, has a great GUI and is incredibly stable."
"This solution can be used on many different platforms including Windows and Linux."
"The solution is very stable."
"The versatility, simplicity, and stability of the product are it's most valuable features."
"This is a good and easy solution for running virtual environments."
"This solution creates a snapshot of virtual machines so you can create test environments."
"The flexibility as well as performance wise and as well as data volume, we have huge volume stored."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution were the support and performance of the product and the flexibility it gives you to work."
"Technically, the main reason why I'm using Red Hat is because of its stability."
"The solution makes migration easy."
"RHEV’s cost is much less compared to VMware."
"It's a scalable solution."
"It is very stable."
"The solution has a good licensing module."
"Customers are moving to open source and Red Hat is the leader in this particular space. I think customers feel more confident running Red Hat Virtualization than VMware."
"The most valuable features of RHEV are all the tools, such as virtualization, management of cloud platforms, and integration of container environments. The solution has good compatibility between virtualization, content management, and cloud management. Having the full set of these tools is the advantage of it."
 

Cons

"We're working with them to be able to allow the local USB ports to be ported over to the remote desktop, running VirtualBox."
"They could improve the graphics functionality of the product."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"Having live migrations to move a running server to other hardware would be great."
"The technical support needs to improve."
"Basically, the GUI and command-line interface need improvement."
"The communications setup lags. It does not connect properly so the batching and networking is a bit slow."
"The solution has to do a better job of promoting the product and its licensing capabilities."
"The support is tricky in a few places. We're facing some challenges within Malaysia where we don't really have the system integrators available who can provide extended support. When we need personnel on-site, we can't get them."
"RHEV can improve by keeping pace with new features and new enhancements. They should not be halted or delayed innovation because over the past quarter the enhancements have not been as fast as they have been previously."
"While everything needs improvement in some way, I have no specifics."
"The Administration of the Oracle database and the SAP ERP needs improvement."
"The solution could use network virtualization."
"We hope that Red Hat can produce a paradigm edition. We are looking for paradigm computing and paradigm storage. Its scalability can be improved. It is not easy to scale, and we hope that Red Hat can provide a more scalable system. They should also provide local service and support. Our customers are looking for a good software vendor to provide professional services."
"The solution should be made more user-friendly."
"The biggest improvement would be more third-party direct support for things like backups and provisioning through third-party portals."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price wise, Oracle VM VirtualBox is a six on a scale from one to ten."
"Everything is free within limitations. Once you go over a certain level of usage you have to license the product."
"The license I use is free."
"No licensing is required as it is open-source."
"It is an open-source solution."
"This is an open-source product and it can be used free of charge."
"The product is free to use."
"There are no licensing fees."
"We have to pay extra for vulnerability and fault tolerance."
"I believe we pay on a yearly basis."
"Price-wise, RHEV is okay, in my opinion."
"We buy a license for commercial use, and we also use the free editions."
"The solution does not require licencing but a subscription is necessary, which is very affordable."
"The price of RHEV is high. It is an open-source solution, the price should be less. The price should not be on par with a solution, such as VMware. It's not more or equal to VMware, it's less, but the difference should be more substantial."
"This is an open-source solution."
"RHEV offers pricing based on a per-physical-machine licensing model."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VL
Jan 13, 2015
vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer
We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Educational Organization
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
52%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does KVM compare to Oracle VM VirtualBox?
KVM is easy to use, stable and flexible. It is mature and very fast. It is an affordable open-source solution that is easy to set up and manage. It offers very good security. It has a virtual manag...
What do you like most about Oracle VM VirtualBox?
The product’s most valuable feature is the ability to manage multiple operating systems through one application.
What do you like most about RHEV?
The initial setup is fairly straightforward and well-documented. The process is very similar to its competitors. The success of your setup depends on how well you plan.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RHEV?
It's a budget product as far as I'm concerned. It's way cheaper than any of its competitors. The only thing cheaper than Red Hat is that the people who take the Red Hat code clone it and then self-...
What needs improvement with RHEV?
The cons are that you have extensive third-party support for Microsoft and VMware platforms that don't exist in the Red Hat world. Red Hat has some partners, but if your company uses something that...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Airbus, Colorado State University, SCS Africa, Wolf Medical Systems.
Qualcomm and Bonham's Auction House.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle VM VirtualBox vs. RHEV and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.