Nyotron PARANOID vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiEDR
Sponsored
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th)
Nyotron PARANOID
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (50th)
Symantec Endpoint Security
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
140
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (5th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the market share of Fortinet FortiEDR is 5.0% and it increased by 36.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Nyotron PARANOID is 0.1% and it increased by 108.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of Symantec Endpoint Security is 5.1% and it decreased by 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Unique Categories:
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7.4%
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Tintin Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
May 1, 2023
Helped our organization by providing reports that identify network weaknesses
We are an incident response team, and we use Fortinet FortiEDR for our cyber protection-related activities Fortinet FortiEDR has helped our organization by providing reports that identify network weaknesses. With the proper training, the solution is easy to use. In some cases, the solution has…
Abel Browarnik - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2024
A cost-effective security solution for endpoint protection
We use Nyotron PARANOID to protect endpoints. It serves as a second and last line of protection. It often detects threats that other endpoint protection systems such as Symantec, McAfee, Windows Defender, and Malwarebytes may overlook Nyotron PARANOID used to include a SOC. Every endpoint,…
Muhammad Ejaz ul Hassan - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 7, 2022
Mature, simplified management, and complete protection
If there is a suspicious file, it is put into a sandbox where Symantec does an analysis. After the analysis, Symantec marks the file as a risk, but it doesn't blacklist or block the file. If a file is already known to be harmful, I would like them to automatically block or blacklist it to reduce the damage. It will stop the attack by at least 50%. Sometimes, administrators do not see the console on a daily basis, and sometimes, they assume that Symantec will block and delete the file, which is not the case. I would like it to block the file so that you won't be able to open the file. Another improvement area is reporting. Its reporting is more technical. As a technical person, it gives me 100% value, but if someone from the business staff wants to see what exactly is going on, you cannot give them these reports, and they won't get the value out of it. Currently, the data is not presentable for any C-level person.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Nyotron protects your users and does not acquire any threat intelligence."
"First of all, it does the job. It prevents harm to the operating system. Also, the visibility it gives to the user and to the administrator is very good."
"ATP is really impressive, and with EDR, it is the best solution I have ever known."
"The most valuable feature is the virus and malware detection capability."
"The tool has predefined rules, like which actions to block or allow. This makes it easy because I don't have to figure out what policies to deploy."
"The product has valuable features for insights."
"The solution offers very good security features and is comparable to Sophos."
"The application and device control are valuable features, and the live update is another one. We have a schedule to check every four hours for the live update."
"The product blocks computer viruses."
"The fact that it has centralized management is the most valuable feature."
 

Cons

"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The solution is not stable."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The support needs improvement."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The main feature that is missing is to have the same solution on servers. Currently it's only protecting the client side, not the server. If they would add the server in the same solution, that would be great."
"The solution should be available on Linux and other platforms, including mobile platforms such as Android and iOS."
"More control features can be added, and its performance can also be better. Sometimes, the performance is not good when we access the cloud console. Moving to each tab is slow. The dashboard can be a little bit user-friendly. For some users, it is a bit difficult. If someone is a little bit familiar with it, then it is fine. Otherwise, it is hard to find policies in Symantec."
"The virus definitions could be updated more frequently."
"Users mostly complain that the solution slows down the system whenever something is scanned."
"It's not cheap."
"I know they were just bought out by Broadcom and there have been some difficulties with Broadcom as far as getting license renewals, etc. Mostly, due to the fact that it's confusing, even for the vendor, people are turned off by it. The vendors are telling us that it can take weeks for them to get a renewal quote, nevermind the actual renewal."
"We were having a problem in Version 14, where the client machines used to go into the health state and once it restarted, and never came back again."
"The tool switches off automatically, and I have to restart it. Also, we had to manually fix some issues that cropped up while using the tool."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Offered at a high price"
"It's not cheap, but it's not expensive either."
"Fortinet FortiEDR is available at a very competitive price compared to the other products in the market."
"The hardware costs about €100,000 and about €20,000 annually for access."
"I'm not familiar with pricing, but it looks a bit costly compared to other vendors I think."
"It is expensive and I would rate it 8 on the scale."
"There are no issues with the pricing."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
Information not available
"There are subscription costs, we typically purchase the annual subscription. There can be other expenses too, for example, we use CrowdStrike also as part of our policy."
"It provides a good solution at a good price."
"The price of the solution could be less expensive."
"It's pretty awesome price-wise. That's why we give it to most of our clients. It isn't very expensive. Compared to Cisco AMP, which is very expensive, its price is okay. It's also cheaper than Malwarebytes."
"We pay on a yearly basis..."
"The pricing is as per the environment. If all the features are there, there will be a cost for them. There were no additional costs for me. Support and other things were included in the pricing."
"This is not the cheapest product and I know others that are most cost-effective, although it is difficult to compare because it depends on the features."
"Licensing is per user. Therefore, it makes it easy to do licensing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
32%
Hospitality Company
15%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiEDR?
We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiEDR?
We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it...
What do you like most about Nyotron PARANOID?
Nyotron protects your users and does not acquire any threat intelligence.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nyotron PARANOID?
Users were willing to pay because of the peace of mind that comes with the solution.
What needs improvement with Nyotron PARANOID?
There was an initial problem, we had to run the system in detection mode rather than prevention mode. The solution sh...
Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valu...
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior sol...
What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.
 

Also Known As

enSilo, FortiEDR
No data available
Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial, Healthcare, Legal, Technology, Enterprise, Manufacturing ... 
El Al Airlines
Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nyotron PARANOID vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.