Mule Anypoint Platform vs TIBCO Spotfire comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Mule Anypoint Platform
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st)
TIBCO Spotfire
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Mule Anypoint Platform is 7.0%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Spotfire is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Integration
Unique Categories:
Business-to-Business Middleware
11.9%
Workload Automation
0.8%
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools
1.5%
 

Featured Reviews

Rohit Sircar - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 7, 2022
Perfect customer service, consistent stability, and definite return on investment
The most important thing that I have seen is it has removed the data silos because of the three-tier architecture that Mule Anypoint Platform follows The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management. I think in the next release if they could work with the low-code…
Rajesh Nai - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 8, 2022
A robust BI tool, with good dashboard features and adverse event tracking
We use this solution to prepare dashboards to monitor our clients products and to capture, then track and monitor, adverse events in the system This solution allows for much easier navigation to specific pages of data making searches much more time-efficient. This solution allows us to integrate…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"It can scale."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The ability to connect to many different data sources is one of the key features. The other would then be the different ways in which that data can be visualized."
"It’s stable and straightforward."
"One of the main features is integrated statistical analysis."
"It allows users to quickly analyze data from a variety of sources and visualize it with powerful, interactive graphs, and charts."
"We used it pretty heavily in gathering data, which goes to our VPs. They are able to base their next revenue planning based on this metric. So, it has been invaluable."
"The out-of-the-box features are simple and easy to use across the board."
"The product's initial setup phase was simple."
"We particularly like the data angling feature of this solution. This gives us the ability to work on data transformations, join files, and carry out other data preparation tasks all in a single tool."
 

Cons

"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"The data compression has room for improvement."
"Print capability and trigger-based events."
"The initial setup can be difficult."
"The initial setup is complicated and needs experience and knowledge."
"When it comes to data manipulation, there are features which are good, but one of the features which has really been missing in Spotfire is an offline ability for data manipulation."
"One aspect where Spotfire could improve is its global recognition, especially in terms of support."
"We would like an easier way to get the product to the cloud. Right now, we have the on-premise version, and we would like to find a way to make it easier to migrate it over to the cloud."
"We would like to see some improvement in the default properties of the solution, so that there is less need for us to spend our time coding."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
"The product comes complete at one set price including support."
"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."
"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."
"The product is still very expensive."
"This product carries a monthly licensing charge, with the amount depending on the features that are to be included. This costs also covers the use of technical support."
"The cost is a few hundred dollars per user per year."
"The price-point for this solution is negotiable depending on usage levels."
"The solution is affordable one."
"The ROI is nearly impossible to calculate."
"The Tibco sales teams have been very difficult to work with - ignoring requests, misrepresenting level of demand, etc."
"I would describe TIBCO Spotfire as an averagely-priced product."
"The cost of TIBCO Spotfire could improve. It should be less expensive. It's the most expensive visualization tool in our company."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
What do you like most about TIBCO Spotfire?
TIBCO Spotfire is easy to use. We initiated Spotfire as POC, with support from a tech team based in South Africa. While they assisted with the setup, we conducted the POC ourselves.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO Spotfire?
The solution is pricey. Most organizations might find it costly because very few are utilizing these features. We initially purchased the perpetual licensing. Additionally, there was an extra cost ...
 

Also Known As

Data Integrator
Spotfire
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Allergan, ASSS de Montreal, Avantium, Blue River, Bank of Montreal, Citibank, FrieslandCampina, Hellmann Logistics, Merck, Novartis
Find out what your peers are saying about Mule Anypoint Platform vs. TIBCO Spotfire and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.