Mule Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

Mule Anypoint Platform
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st)
SAP Process Orchestration
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the market share of Mule Anypoint Platform is 11.9% and it decreased by 18.5% compared to the previous year. The market share of SAP Process Orchestration is 6.9% and it decreased by 52.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business-to-Business Middleware
Unique Categories:
Workload Automation
0.8%
Cloud Data Integration
7.0%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

VS
Jul 21, 2023
Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.
SK
Mar 22, 2020
Seamless integration with backend systems, but it needs to be more flexible
At this point, I'm not sure what advice I would give to those people who are researching this type of solution. I am looking at other products because I want to see how good they are. It may turn out that SAP Process Orchestration is still much better, which means that I would continue with it. There are pros and cons with all vendors, so it may not be worth switching if you are already using this. At this point, I am generally satisfied with SAP, but the roadmap is something that is bothering us. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"API management."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"It can scale."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."
"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."
 

Cons

"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"It should give better control over account management."
"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."
"It requires some maintenance."
"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."
"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."
"It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development."
"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."
"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."
"The product is still very expensive."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."
"There are fees in addition to the licensing."
"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."
"The pricing for this solution is fine."
"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."
"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."
"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."
"The fee for maintenance is costly."
"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?
It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?
We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?
Implementing changes and introducing new interfaces in Process Orchestration should have been more straightforward. The current system is burdened with a heavy load and has become overly complex, m...
 

Also Known As

Data Integrator
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
Find out what your peers are saying about Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.