Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Mule Anypoint Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mule Anypoint Platform
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the market share of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 19.6% and it increased by 28.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of Mule Anypoint Platform is 13.6% and it decreased by 13.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Business-to-Business Middleware
11.9%
Workload Automation
0.8%
 

Featured Reviews

David Viana - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 19, 2024
A cloud solution to integrate systems with automated business processing
We use the solution to integrate other systems like SAP and Salesforce for orchestration and the API. We also use it to automate business processing and balancing workflows The solution integrates customer CRM data with various systems. It offers a user-friendly interface, making integration…
SM
May 29, 2023
Scales well, high availability, and convenient to use
The initial setup of the Mule Anypoint Platform is simple. My team was trained in only a few weeks. The process of deployment took a couple of hours. My advice to others is for them to use the catalyst service. They help you get started and gradually let you be on your own. Mule Anypoint Platform is also highly convenient since my team was able to quickly set up the new team for the initial implementation. Within a few weeks, they began developing independently, gradually reducing the need for external support and focusing on efficiently running the system with internal resources. I rate the initial setup of the Mule Anypoint Platform a nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."
"The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature."
"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."
"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."
"The tool’s biggest benefit is the access we have to other Azure products."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"It has improved our organization a lot because of the increase in productivity, and it has simplified the development of products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly effective tool where you can build integrations so effectively. If you establish the integration platform, it increases productivity. It helps us to do effective re-authentication, and it speeds the integration."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
 

Cons

"It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"The solution should include more connectors."
"There could be custom code for the product's components."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"The price could be improved."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a cost-efficient platform."
"The pricing is not expensive."
"If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."
"Its price depends on the number of transactions, storage capacity, etc., defining if the subscription will be monthly or weekly."
"It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."
"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."
"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."
"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
33%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
5%
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution. A few of my projects got delayed because of the charges. The pricing depends on whether an organization can handle all the cost...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The solution should include more connectors. In one of my projects, we faced issues with SAP connectivity. The connector needed to connect the SAP was not compatible with our architecture. We had t...
What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
 

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
Data Integrator
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.