Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Data Loss Preven...
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GTB Technologies Inspector
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the market share of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is 19.7% and it increased by 6.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of GTB Technologies Inspector is 2.3% and it decreased by 27.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

RS
Apr 10, 2023
Provides visibility under a single console and is good with integration
We use this solution for data loss prevention, enforcement and monitored file labeling.  Having visibility under a single console has helped us.  The solution has multiple modules and is good with integration. It also enables data classification and monitored file labeling. It's a classic…
Shruti Shetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 19, 2023
An affordable and scalable product that has a good dashboard and a centralized console for everything
The product has an endpoint OCR, which other DLPs don't provide The product has a centralized console for everything. The centralized console is really good. The product’s dashboard is really good for creating customized reports. The solution’s performance must be improved. Endpoint OCR affects…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is the OCR."
"The Optical Character Recognition (OCR) functionality is another helpful feature, especially for unstructured data. Being able to discover sensitive data in an unstructured format is the most beneficial element of the solution."
"Our organization's intellectual property is not misused or extracted without permission."
"The solution’s content classification is the best."
"It was mostly stable."
"It has helped us meet CTI requirements. Some employees accidentally shared information and it was able to block that information. That is one of the biggest benefits we have seen from this tool."
"We like the ability to customize our requirements and rules, as well as its ease of use and management. It also has a cloud feature and proxy functionality."
"The incident management and fingerprinting have been the most valuable features."
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."
"The product has a centralized console for everything."
"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."
"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."
"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."
"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."
"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."
 

Cons

"In terms of display, the support and the Mac platform requires a lot of improvement."
"The reporting features, the real-time reporting, can be improved in Forcepoint. On the dashboard, we don't have a feature that shows real-time incidents. We have to schedule a report in the environment."
"One area that could be improved is the support. The current support is not very good. Because they don't come on time when a customer really needs it, they take a lot of time to troubleshoot anything."
"I am not able to get support directly from Forcepoint."
"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention can improve by having an uninstall option for the client or restart of a client agent can be controlled from the server. This feature is missing which is available with other solutions."
"The policy update size and agent size could be improved. We would also like to have a proper solution for Linux OS which Forcepoint does not offer."
"Lacks the ability to control the USB port devices so that content coming out of the port is blocked."
"An area for improvement in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is the complex UI and policy deployment. You have to find the policies, and then designing the policies is also tricky."
"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."
"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."
"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."
"The solution’s performance must be improved."
"The performance could be better."
"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."
"One feature that I'm getting ready to take advantage of more is the ability to add more data crawlers to the DLP on-prem environment, without any extra Forcepoint costs or licensing needed for that additional data server. That will help in reducing the stress on the data server that we're using now."
"Forcepoint offers a more cost-effective solution because everything, including OCR, is included in one package, unlike Symantec, where it is an add-on with an additional cost."
"The cost for the product for our use is less than $10 per user."
"Forcepoint DLP is a bit expensive."
"They have to look at a different pricing structure for small to medium-sized enterprises because the cost is too high."
"The pricing is reasonable. That's why we went with Forcepoint. They were pretty competitive."
"The pricing is fine."
"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."
"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."
"The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."
"The tool is not expensive."
"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?
The technical support for the solution is very good.
What needs improvement with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?
They need to improve their reporting feature as well as the incident response. They have very limited and basic response rules available for incident management so they need to improve them.
What do you like most about GTB Technologies Inspector?
The product has a centralized console for everything.
What needs improvement with GTB Technologies Inspector?
The solution’s performance must be improved. Endpoint OCR affects the performance of the solution. Sometimes, the users are unable to send any emails.
What is your primary use case for GTB Technologies Inspector?
The product has an endpoint OCR, which other DLPs don't provide.
 

Also Known As

Forcepoint DLP, Forcepoint Data Security Suite, Websense Data Security Suite
Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Alphawest, Betsson, Cellcom Israel Ltd., Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, Confartigianato Vicenza, EverBank, Finansbank, iGATE, Landa Digital Printing, Northern California Bank, Reliance Capital, Remosa, Toyota, Scavolini, Zim Integrated Shipping Services
Supya Security Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.