Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Trellix Endpoint Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiEDR
Sponsored
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th)
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (34th)
Trellix Endpoint Security
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
96
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (11th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the market share of Fortinet FortiEDR is 5.0% and it increased by 36.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.2% and it decreased by 47.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Trellix Endpoint Security is 4.5% and it increased by 33.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Unique Categories:
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7.4%
No other categories found
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
4.1%
 

Featured Reviews

AE
May 1, 2023
Easy to configure and use, and improved our customer satisfaction
We work with the end-to-end Fortinet portfolio, especially their UTM firewall, anti-APT, and EDR solutions Fortinet has improved our customer satisfaction. This is primarily what I see. Fortinet FortiEDR is easy to use. It is easy to deploy, manage, and configure. Fortinet helps free up around 14…
Donald Baldwin - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 20, 2023
Its sandboxing features help ensure security for us and our customers
The menu could be cleaned up. They rebranded it, but it's the same menu. It could also be nicer to do reports and stuff, where some services we've had used to give us more information on the threat. But overall, we're pretty happy with it. Other than that, there are things you have to have an administrator do because the solution is complicated. However, that prevents users from doing dumb things. If you're using Comodo as a home user, it might be a war, but it's fine for businesses. It would be nice if Comodo had a home user version.
AV
May 2, 2023
Useful for containment and taking a triage image
We build our own use cases and those provided by the vendor for specific upcoming attack scenarios. Configuring the rule set using Trellix Endpoint Security is very much flexible based on the IOCs Trellix Endpoint Security is good for doing containment immediately. We can get visibility of…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."
"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well."
"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."
"It's stable and reliable."
"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."
"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."
"Initially, the DLP was very valuable for disabling access to USB drives."
"It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that."
"It's easy to use."
"The solution offers very good endpoint security."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"The endpoint security, antivirus and firewall are the most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security."
"McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly."
"We can manage everything from the central console and it is very easy."
 

Cons

"Detections could be improved."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."
"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."
"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."
"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."
"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."
"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."
"We'd like the solution to include advanced web filtering capabilities, similar to what Sophos offers."
"Currently, Trellix Endpoint Security can't find the running mutexes, while other open-source products can do it."
"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."
"The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it."
"The vendor should simplify the way they bundle the products because it's very hard to explain to customers what products contain which features."
"The solution should provide a more easy way to uninstall it on specific stations."
"The security of this solution needs improvement."
"We know that McAfee isn't the best antivirus and it can't protect us 100%, although we are okay with the level of protection that it gives us."
"While we are pleased with the endpoint solution, there should also be a separate one for the firewall."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fortinet FortiEDR has a yearly subscription."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"Fortinet FortiEDR is available at a very competitive price compared to the other products in the market."
"The price is comprable to other endpoint security solutions."
"The pricing is good."
"While the cost may have been high, we view it as a worthwhile investment due to Fortinet's reliability and long-term performance."
"I know it is tough to get big budget additions up front, but I highly recommend deploying environment wide and adding the forensic service."
"It's not cheap, but it's not expensive either."
"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."
"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."
"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."
"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."
"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is inexpensive."
"The product is pricey."
"The product is very reasonably priced."
"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."
"The price of this product is good."
"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market."
"McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so."
"It is not that expensive. There is no additional cost. We got the entire bundle together."
"The price of the solution is in the middle range compare to others and could be reduced. There are not any additional costs."
"I am happy with the pricing."
"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive. We are on a monthly license."
"The price of the solution is fair, we have a complete security package."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Construction Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Educational Organization
37%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiEDR?
We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiEDR?
We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
The product’s pricing depends upon the cases. I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten, where one is cheap, a...
What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
HTTP is not functioning on an Advanced Endpoint Protection. That's a major concern of customers. Also, support needs ...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
Trellix Endpoint Security is an affordable tool. Its renewal price is also quite low. The product is available as a s...
 

Also Known As

enSilo, FortiEDR
Comodo AEP
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial, Healthcare, Legal, Technology, Enterprise, Manufacturing ... 
Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.