Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs Microsoft Defender for Identity comparison

Bitdefender and Microsoft are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Bitdefender is ranked #30, while Microsoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8. Bitdefender holds a 1.3% mindshare in ATP, compared to Microsoft’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Read 5 Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer reviews

402 Views
394 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Iden...

Read 28 Microsoft Defender for Identity reviews

6,417 Views
1,412 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Microsoft Defender for Iden...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer and Microsoft Defender for Identity both compete in the cybersecurity space, focusing on threat detection and identity protection, respectively. Microsoft Defender for Identity appears to have an advantage due to its integration capabilities within the Microsoft ecosystem, offering a more robust feature set.

Features: Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer provides real-time analytics, advanced malware analysis, and sandboxing technology for threat detection. Microsoft Defender for Identity integrates seamlessly with Microsoft’s ecosystem, offers identity protection, secure access, and features such as behavioral analytics and vulnerability management.

Room for Improvement: Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer could enhance its integration capabilities, improve ease of management, and expand threat intelligence features. Microsoft Defender for Identity may improve its user interface, reduce the steep learning curve, and enhance reporting and alert customization options for broader user flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer offers a straightforward deployment process and flexible options, while its customer support is generally well-received. Microsoft Defender for Identity, being deeply integrated with Microsoft tools, has a steeper learning curve but benefits from comprehensive documentation and a robust support network.

Pricing and ROI: Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is cost-effective in terms of setup, delivering strong ROI through efficient threat management. Microsoft Defender for Identity involves a higher initial cost but justifies this with significant ROI for businesses utilizing the Microsoft environment, thanks to enhanced security features and integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

30th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Defender for Iden...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (4th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Identity is 4.5%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Defender for Identity	4.5%
Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer	1.3%
Other	94.2%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Basawaraj Vastrad

Technical Director at BD Software Distribution Pvt Ltd

Automated and manual threat analysis provides deep insights for potential threat remediation

The most valuable features of Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer include manual and auto-submission. The sandbox analyzer provides a combination of technologies including machine learning-based technologies. Network analytics is performed, and the tool analyzes using threat feeds. Manual and automated submissions allow suspicious files or URLs to be analyzed thoroughly, providing deep insights for further investigation. This information is crucial for making informed decisions on remediating potential threats.

Read full review

Ram-Krish

Cloud Security & Governance at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Protect on-premises and hybrid environments with advanced threat detection and seamless integration

Our Active Directory implementation is a hybrid one. The advanced threat protection is one of the strengths of Microsoft Defender for Identity, as it utilizes user and entity analytics and can detect indicative attacks. It identifies lateral movements, privilege escalations, and alerts on potential attacks. The tool is also used for security posture assessment. The seamless integration with other Microsoft solutions within our Microsoft-centric environment is also a major advantage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Bitdefender has shown fantastic stability over the past eight years with no major incidents reported."

"The solution is useful in the event of a gray file or grayware, as there are certain files users may download of which we know little about."

"I like the fact that it works pretty well. It can be a little aggressive at times, but I'd rather have it be a little bit aggressive than not catch what it's supposed to catch. We've been running that platform for about five years, and we've not really had any viruses or malware get through. It's also easy to set up, and it's easy to manage."

"Sandbox Analyzer is easy to use. It's simple to drill down into the data. In a lot of the competing products, an extremely informed end-user can do battle with the tools provided, but in today's market, end-users have less and less time to try and keep up. The CSAW alerts come out every day, and they're huge. Adobe did a master patch last Thursday and another one a few days later."

"It is easy to use, and there is a lot of automation. So, users don't need to worry about that."

"Microsoft Defender for Identity provides excellent visibility into threats by leveraging real-time analytics and data intelligence."

"The feature I like most is that you can create your own customized detection rules. It has a lot of default alerts and rules, but you can customize them according to your business needs."

"The most valuable feature is its hybrid artificial intelligence, which gathers forensic data to track and counteract security threats, much like the CSI series in effect."

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Defender for Identity are the simulations; whenever something happens, it provides complete step-by-step process details, including the hierarchy, how it happens in the environment, and the lateral movement, which is amazing."

"We use AD Connect to sync on-premises AD to Azure AD, and so far, it has been effective."

"This solution has advanced a lot over the last few years."

"Defender for Identity has not affected the end-user experience."

"The feature I like the most about Defender for Identity is the entity tags. They give you the ability to identify sensitive accounts, devices, and groups. You also have honeytoken entities, which are devices that are identified as "bait" for fraudulent actors."

More Microsoft Defender for Identity pros

Cons

"One area that needs improvement in Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is the addition of an asset management feature."

"It should be more secure. There should be more protection, especially for non-signature-based malware. It works fine for non-signature-based malware, but I expect it to become a bit more advanced to be able to cope with future or upcoming environments."

"It does everything we need. We haven't been able to throw anything at it that it couldn't handle."

"We propose the on-premises solution to most of our customers, for which we must provide a license, although no such request accompanies customers who want a cloud-based solution."

"We would like to see the time it takes for the sandbox to analyze a file reduced from its ten or fifteen minute duration to five."

"It would be better if there were real-time alerts. The whole suite, unlike most anti-virus consoles that just ping you when there's an infection or something, for some inexplicable reason, Bitdefender doesn't do that. The most you could do is get an hourly email, or maybe if there's an outbreak that affects 30% of our machines, it sends me an email. There's no real-time alert to say, "Hey, so-and-so literally 30 seconds ago just had this happen on their machine." Real-time reporting would be a huge improvement. All in all, it's a pretty nice product, generally speaking. They do a pretty good job. They can pretty much go toe to toe with just about anybody. But it's that kind of real-time nature. I've not had occasion to use the EDR portion to actually try and do any kind of custom scripting to drill into things that are going on at the endpoints. But my understanding from reading comments of others is that it's not particularly flexible in that regard to be able to do things like that."

"The areas of Microsoft Defender for Identity that can be improved include its cost, which is quite expensive when integrated into Sentinel. Additionally, there is room for improvement in its integration with non-Microsoft applications and systems."

"And when you are working in a priority IP address, Identity is not able to know that those IPs are from the company. It sees that the IPs are from Taiwan or from Hong Kong or from India, even though they are internal IPs, resulting in a lot of false positives."

"There is no option to remedy an issue directly from the console. If we see an alert, we can't fix it from the console. Instead, we must depend on other Microsoft products, such as MDE. That is a significant drawback. It simply works as a scanner, which can sometimes put enough load on the sensors. Immediate actions should be possible from the dashboard because. It can prevent issues from spreading further."

"The solution should provide more detailed data regarding anomaly detections."

"Defender for Identity gives us visibility, but we often get false positives from Azure that take us down the garden path. We go through 30 incidents each day and most of those are false positives or benign positive alerts. Occasionally, we get true positive alerts."

"One improvement I would recommend is the integration of an admin application within Teams, allowing easy access to attack information on a mobile platform to promptly alert affected users and their friends."

"They should improve the automation for impossible travel detection. When connected to Wi-Fi and then to VPN, the system sometimes interprets the IP address change as impossible travel."

"The solution could improve how it handles on-premises Android-related attacks."

More Microsoft Defender for Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You need a license to a certain extent. You need to pay for advanced features. For corporate accounts, it isn't is really a problem, but pricing is an important thing for many companies."

"I think it's probably less expensive than something like CrowdStrike. We got a really good deal because it was literally their year-end, and they were trying to close all the sales for the week. So we bought a three-year contract from them. It roughly ended up costing me somewhere around $17 for an endpoint per year. It was really quite a nice pricing. I've talked to other folks where they got CrowdStrike, and it's like $60 for an endpoint for a year. It does, and they can be pretty aggressive if you're dealing with them directly, and I have. So no complaints there."

"Defender for Identity is a little more expensive than other Microsoft products. Identity and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are both a bit costly."

"You won't be able to change your tenants from where you deploy them. For example, if you select Canada, they will charge you based on Canadian pricing. If you are also in London, when you deploy in Canada, the pound is higher than Canadian dollars, but your platform resources are billable in Canadian dollars. Using your pounds to pay for any of these things will be cheaper. Or, if you deploy in London, they will charge you based on your local currency."

"It is very affordable considering that other SIEM solutions are much more expensive and have many more licensing restrictions and fees."

"The product is costly, and we had multiple discussions with accounting to receive a discounted rate. However, on the open market, the tool is expensive."

"Microsoft Defender for Identity comes as part of the Microsoft E5 licensing stack."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer?

Cost is not an additional burden since Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is offered as a bundle with other Bitdefender solutions. It does not carry additional costs like other companies who charge extra.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer?

One area that needs improvement in Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is the addition of an asset management feature. Currently, it is not part of the solution and could be beneficial in future updates.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer?

I use Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer ( /products/bitdefender-sandbox-analyzer-reviews ) mostly whenever there is any suspicious event or incident occurring. Bitdefender automatically submits it to th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Defender for Identity?

Microsoft Defender for Identity provides excellent visibility into threats by leveraging real-time analytics and data intelligence.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for Identity?

I really would have to sit down to think about how Microsoft Defender for Identity can be improved. I didn't take stock in what needs to be improved because I appreciated having the tools right the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Defender for Identity?

My main use cases for Microsoft Defender for Identity include Conditional Access, checking risky users, remediating risky users, and user sign-ins. I can easily remediate or determine what the user...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Compared 44% of the time

IRONSCALES vs Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Compared 29% of the time

Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection vs Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer

Compared 27% of the time

More Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer Competitors

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 12% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 6% of the time

BloodHound Enterprise vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

December 2025

Download Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Identity

December 2025

Download Microsoft Defender for Identity product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure Advanced Threat Protection, Azure ATP, MS Defender for Identity

Overview

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer is a security solution that enhances the organization posture against sophisticated or targeted attacks through advanced detection and reporting capabilities of elusive, persistent threats that try to penetrate your network.

Bitdefender

Microsoft Defender for Identity offers real-time threat detection and protection for hybrid Active Directory environments. It integrates with Microsoft 365 components for seamless security and monitors advanced behaviors, enhancing identity protection across cloud and on-premises environments.

Microsoft Defender for Identity provides detailed threat insights and user behavior analytics to detect unauthorized access and notify anomalies. It allows setting custom detection rules, enhancing threat response automation. While it needs improvements in cloud security, SIEM integration, and access controls, users leverage its ability to mitigate identity threats like suspicious logins and ransomware. Enhanced integration with Microsoft security products ensures a coordinated threat response for identity control and privilege management.

What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Identity?

Active Directory Federation: Seamlessly integrates with Microsoft 365 for comprehensive security.
Real-time Security Monitoring: Provides immediate insights into advanced user behaviors and potential threats.
Threat Insights: Delivers detailed analysis of threats with the ability to customize detection rules.
User Behavior Analytics: Analyzes user activities to detect anomalies and potential risks.
Identity Protection: Offers comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments.

What benefits should users expect from reviews of Microsoft Defender for Identity?

Unauthorized Access Prevention: Identifies potential unauthorized activities with advanced detection mechanisms.
Anomaly Notification: Alerts users to unexpected activities within their environments.
Threat Response Automation: Facilitates rapid response to threats with automated solutions.
Enhanced Cloud Security: Strengthens identity management across hybrid and cloud frameworks.

In specific industries, organizations implement Microsoft Defender for Identity to secure on-premises and hybrid Active Directory environments through user and entity behavior analytics, malicious activity detection, and integration with Microsoft security tools. This approach enhances security posture assessment and helps mitigate identity threats like identity harvesting and unauthorized access.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe

Microsoft Defender for Identity is trusted by companies such as St. Luke’s University Health Network, Ansell, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity

November 2025

Free Report: Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitdefender Sandbox Analyzer vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.