BigFix vs Trellix Endpoint Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiEDR
Sponsored
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th)
BigFix
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
91
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (5th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (15th), Patch Management (3rd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (4th)
Trellix Endpoint Security
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
96
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (11th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the market share of Fortinet FortiEDR is 5.0% and it increased by 36.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of BigFix is 0.9% and it increased by 24.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of Trellix Endpoint Security is 4.5% and it increased by 33.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Unique Categories:
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7.4%
Configuration Management
9.6%
Patch Management
15.2%
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
4.1%
 

Featured Reviews

AE
May 1, 2023
Easy to configure and use, and improved our customer satisfaction
We work with the end-to-end Fortinet portfolio, especially their UTM firewall, anti-APT, and EDR solutions Fortinet has improved our customer satisfaction. This is primarily what I see. Fortinet FortiEDR is easy to use. It is easy to deploy, manage, and configure. Fortinet helps free up around 14…
DocBurnham - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
Easy to use, good sub-capacity licensing, and helpful support
It matches with the ILMT tool. We're trying to validate the licensing for IBM software.  We're using the permanent discovery tool for septic for hardware and software too. For IBM, we have to use that due to the reporting of sub-capacity licenses. It's mostly easy to use. The sub-capacity…
SS
Oct 31, 2022
Scalable and quickly deployable, but they should try moving away from the signature-based model
It covers the AV and malware security piece It's mainly for compliance. In terms of products in the market, it's probably not the best, but it's the one that is already paid for under the corporate buy. It basically checks the box that we're doing malware threat prevention and antivirus…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The most valuable point is when you deploy an application, you have to make sure that the application has been deployed to all computers and that is working perfectly. This solution works well at deployments."
"It has plugins development options, which are great."
"BigFix is easy to use."
"Almost every feature is wonderful in BigFix. It is very stable, and we can rely on it. It is an awesome tool."
"It enables us to patch our systems quickly and within expectations and to increase our volume as needed. It has also helped us compress our patch sites. We used to do it monthly but now we do it weekly."
"Pre-packaged support for many third-party applications such as Adobe, Google, Mozilla, Sun (Java), WinZip, and others."
"The solution is unbelievably scalable."
"The most valuable and essential features of BigFix are all of them, they are needed when serving the purpose of the desktop operation framework. We cannot run operations without patching or without having an appropriate mechanism for deploying software, et cetera. The features all serve their purpose for our use case."
"The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable."
"Dynamic Application Containment."
"The most valuable feature is the centralized console where everything can be controlled by the administration."
"We really like the dashboard from Trellix and we've found that it's pretty informative."
"The central management console is powerful. You can manage endpoints, DLP, encryption, and all the other features from a single console."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts."
"Would benefit with the addition of DLP features."
 

Cons

"ZTNA can improve latency."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"To make it a ten they should improve the licensing. Second, if they could have one environment for everything it would be nice. For you to install compliance you need to install the server, and then you add the modules. For you to install inventory you install the server and then you add the modules. It's not easy to do. When I was doing it before I learned it, it was not straight forward."
"The deployment has room for improvement and can be more streamlined."
"BigFix can improve the way machines report back to the console. In the external relay management environment, it has become more of a hybrid environment with most of the machines not being on-site. The need of having public-facing reporting items interconnected is becoming more and more crucial. In general, the reporting could use some enhancement."
"I would like the dashboard to be improved to show the problematic machines and good machines."
"In-place and OS upgrades can be improved."
"BigFix should improve its compatibility with other platforms, such as Linux."
"I remember doing restarts a few times. So, making sure that it is rock solid from an executable perspective is important."
"I would like to see different types of reporting and the ability to integrate closer with the cloud."
"I think it would be nice if Dynamic Application Control would come together with McAfee Endpoint Security."
"The software download features could stand improvement."
"There are two main areas that require improvement. One is the size of the packages. Although I'll admit manageability is good, if I want to deploy, let's say just the antivirus or just the firewall, each of those package sizes are quite large. They are sometimes as big as 200MB or 250MB. When I have operations in remote areas where connectivity is always poor, it's difficult. To deploy such a package in a remote location over the internet or something like that is always challenging."
"Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened."
"The tool could provide more advanced protection."
"The local technical support could be better."
"I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product."
"The solution needs to offer better local technical support."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fortinet FortiEDR is available at a very competitive price compared to the other products in the market."
"The hardware costs about €100,000 and about €20,000 annually for access."
"The pricing is good."
"Offered at a high price"
"The price is comprable to other endpoint security solutions."
"We got a good deal on licensing, so it is in the competitive range."
"I'm not familiar with pricing, but it looks a bit costly compared to other vendors I think."
"There are no issues with the pricing."
"The price is very fair."
"We have a subscription-based contract with BigFix."
"The price of the solution is high. There are not any additional fees from the standard license."
"You are charged per server and per workstation when using BigFix. ManageEngine is a lot cheaper than BigFix. There are some additional costs, such as support."
"I would stay with the Managed Virtual Server license model, which is a 1-to-1 license per OS whether it is virtual or physical."
"There's not much big cost. We only have to pay the agents' cost for the server, and for the systems."
"The product is less costly when compared to other solutions, and this is a good solid solution for what we have paid."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing one out of ten."
"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"Licensing is paid yearly."
"The pricing is more or less the same as the other tools in the market."
"The product is expensive."
"Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."
"The price of this product is good."
"There are some extra expenses for using the product, in addition to licensing related to the maintenance of the product."
"It is not that expensive. There is no additional cost. We got the entire bundle together."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
45%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
Educational Organization
37%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiEDR?
We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiEDR?
We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it...
What do you like most about BigFix?
The most valuable features of the solution are Windows patching and the hardware and software inventory.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigFix?
On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing one out of ten.
What needs improvement with BigFix?
The solution’s pricing could be improved.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
Trellix Endpoint Security is an affordable tool. Its renewal price is also quite low. The product is available as a s...
 

Also Known As

enSilo, FortiEDR
Tivoli Endpoint Manager
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial, Healthcare, Legal, Technology, Enterprise, Manufacturing ... 
US Foods, Penn State, St Vincent's Health US Foods, Sabadell Bank, SunTrust, Australia Sydney, Stemac, Capgemini, WNS Global Services, Jebsen & Jessen, CenterBeam, Strauss, Christian Hospital Centre, Brit Insurance, Career Education Corporation
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about BigFix vs. Trellix Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.