Automic Automation Intelligence vs Automic Workload Automation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation Intellig...
Ranking in Workload Automation
19th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Automic Workload Automation
Ranking in Workload Automation
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of Automic Automation Intelligence is 0.6%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Automic Workload Automation is 8.1%, up from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

MH
May 16, 2023
Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable
We use Automic Automation Intelligence for automation analytics in many areas, such as stream management The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful. The solution…
Bernd Stroehle. - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 21, 2023
Offers excellent functionality, reduces job and workload failure, and enhances our compliance processes
Due to Automic Workload Automation's proprietary scripting language, upgrading it can be extremely challenging, unlike other workflow automation products that offer seamless migration. This inflexibility makes Automic Workload Automation the most complex and restrictive solution in the market. Choosing Automic Workload Automation essentially locks us into their ecosystem, making it nearly impossible to switch to a different product. Therefore, I strongly advise against using Automic Workload Automation. Automic Workload Automation's AI capabilities are limited. Most traditional workflow products lack robust support for AI workflows. Airflow might be a suitable option for AI workflows. However, if real-time AI processing is required, a different product altogether is necessary. For example, in the field of genetics, if a workflow involves thousands of jobs, traditional workflow products such as Automic Workload Automation may struggle to handle such a large workload. The maximum capacity of these products might be around 1,000 or 2,000 jobs. In contrast, a genetic workflow could involve up to 100,000 jobs, requiring a completely different workflow product specifically designed for such large-scale processing. Mainstream workflow products like Automic Workload Automation offer similar functionalities and are widely used around the globe. These products typically check for process completion every second. However, in high-performance computing and emerging fields like medicine or ophthalmology, we need to control thousands of jobs simultaneously, requiring millisecond-level process completion checks. To achieve this, we can store event data in databases or perform on-the-fly checks. Additionally, we need to integrate workflow control with workload management to prevent machine overload. These requirements make it unsuitable for tasks like controlling genomic workflows.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Action Packs are a good feature."
"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."
"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."
"The product has benefited our organization. It saves time and manpower."
"Automic is perfect to work with for a lot of job loads."
"It is scalable. We can grow it out."
"It improves the visibility of what is going on on the system. If I have a problem, it is easy to identify, understand dependencies, and identifying the root causes than just running through scripts and searching through applications or servers."
"We use it to automate our business."
"It saves my customers time, money, resources, and efficiency."
"It's pretty stable. After implementation, there hasn't been a single event where we shifted our jobs for the day from automated to manual."
"Support is good and it works fine."
 

Cons

"Integration of the solution could be improved."
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."
"The job reporting feature needs improvement."
"We would like to see more dashboarding into the product, maybe an embedded Java API which we would be able to load on our own."
"When you want to use the entirety of Automic, it is heavy."
"I would like to see features from "Prompt" sets in read Masks."
"I would like to see more stability in the product and have the transition between versions be more seamless."
"The SSH agent is missing in version 12.1. Maybe it would be a good addition to see on the web client of the next version of Atomic."
"The interface could be made more user-friendly in terms of job creation and scheduling, especially when doing bulk job creation."
"From my point of view, the current product needs more stability."
"It is very difficult to migrate. The release automation should be in one package."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used. For example, if you wanted to connect to Dell BMC, you would need a connector."
"Automic Automation Intelligence's licensing costs are expensive and can be yearly or monthly."
"Its price is way up there with BMC. It is a little bit on the expensive side."
"The pricing of Automic Workload Automation varies depending on the specific contract terms."
"We came to a very good deal, but it took us three years to finalize."
"We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive."
"There are different licensing fees for cases where high availability is important."
"The cost of the solution depends on the number of systems that are being orchestrated."
"The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."
"We receive time efficiency from this product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
31%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Automation Intelligence?
The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.
What is your primary use case for Automic Automation Intelligence?
The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without ...
What do you like most about Automic Workload Automation?
It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automic Workload Automation?
The solution was flexible in terms of pricing. We're moving away from it, not due to price, but rather based on our requirements. They did provide us with an unlimited license that matched our budget.
What needs improvement with Automic Workload Automation?
The AI capabilities and predictive modeling aren't very good. I don't see a future for that. It's very basic. That's part of the reason we moved to Stonebranch. They have more analytic capabilities...
 

Also Known As

Terma Suite
Automic Dollar Universe
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB
Find out what your peers are saying about Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Automic Workload Automation and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.