Apache Guacamole vs BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Guacamole
Ranking in Remote Access
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
BeyondTrust Privileged Remo...
Ranking in Remote Access
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Apache Guacamole is 4.3%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access is 3.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Remote Access
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
6.0%
 

Featured Reviews

SP
Dec 26, 2023
A stable and open-source solution that can be used as a gateway
I'm using Apache Guacamole as a gateway The solution's USB redirection could be improved. If the machine has a USB port, I'm not able to redirect it. The solution should include FX protocol instead of RDP. I have been using Apache Guacamole for five to six years. Apache Guacamole is a pretty…
CJ
Aug 17, 2022
Improved our network external access, which has been beneficial for our network security
The solution's Vault is a nice feature. It helps to securely share a security password in teams, but it is not at the level of a password management solution. So, it is just really a vault. We were expecting to have more features to better manage passwords, but that is something that you can work around if you also have a password safe solution. I would like them to have features like password rotation or password auditing, e.g., old passwords. I would like to improve access to the web application, simplifying the web jumps. I would also like them to improve the Vault, which should have features closer to a light password management solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I'm using Apache Guacamole as a gateway."
"The product has improved remote support capabilities since it works fine."
"I like the enterprise credential manager. It's a connector that sits in PRA and tests the credentials for the end user with a process that will clean the password. This is one of PRA's primary features and simplifies user onboarding. There aren't many restrictions or complications. We can add the user while only opening one port, which is more than enough to access the PRA server. Every organization requires only four critical servers out of a hundred and some 50 production servers."
"It's a stable product. Based on the demos and interaction with it, it was stable."
"Its security, simplicity, and ease of deployment and maintenance are the most valuable. It is FIPS compliant, so it goes through severe penetration testing every one year or two years. They have to maintain this compliance. It is very safe. Customers have been using it in the last eight years because of the simplicity of getting it deployed quickly. Most of the people using the solution had been hacked already, so they needed it quickly. As compared to the other solutions in the market, it can be turned on in production very quickly. You don't really need to have a server. It can be deployed very rapidly on VMware or Hyper-V, and you don't need to do an installation. It is a kind of an all-included package that you just deploy in a VM environment. It is basically a VM that is specifically built for a customer. The way the PRA data solutions work is that you need to build them for each customer because of being hard-coded with their SSL certificate, their web page name, and all that."
"Its initial setup process is straightforward."
"This product is very stable and scalable. This is an excellent platform."
"The privileged remote access platform is able to track and record everything that happens within a session."
"PRA stands on its own as a full solution. This is important because it reduces the need to maintain a lot of different services. Also, the integration between those services are sometimes not easy to maintain. So, having a solution like BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access reducing our workload gives us enough time to work on our other issues. The system just runs and does what it is supposed to do."
 

Cons

"The solution's USB redirection could be improved."
"In terms of the ability to automate the creation of new accounts within it, it's still a bit laborious."
"The issue I found with the product revolves around the fact that RDP and SSH sessions take too much time, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The integration of the solution with many platforms is a difficult area to manage and needs to be made easy."
"Some of the capabilities in the solution were not as available or not as outstanding as CyberArk. We had to manage whatever little was available for us, especially its recording capabilities, logs, and a number of things."
"Multiple areas can be improved. We've seen lots of updates in the past year. They have a portal where we can submit our ideas. BeyondTrust is immediately implementing user suggestions. The UI could be more informative. Initially, there were two or three connectors, and now we have five or six. It would be nice if they added a few more connectors for third-party integration. There are multiple tools, but the clients may require more for their convenience."
"One of our gaps or pain points is having multi-factor authentication at the endpoint and using the PRA password injection from BeyondTrust, which does not work in our environment. We can only have MFA at the login of BeyondTrust to check out the password. Therefore, we can't meet our security requirements of having it on the endpoint."
"The integration client, backup solution, and SSO setup and provisioning could be improved. There isn't any documented or supported user provisioning currently, which slows down the processes of onboarding and assigning permissions. I would like to see this improved soon."
"I would love to have a web console and the ability to use the smart card with the web console to provide remote support. If you are on a computer that doesn't have the Bomgar console, you should be able to use the web console to provide support. That's the only thing right now. A web console is nice when you're jumping into a computer, but if you need to elevate the privileges, you currently can't do it with the smart card. If they could figure that out, that would be money."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Don't get into a situation where you are licensing per desktop or per person until you fully understand the licensing."
"I wish it was a little bit cheaper, but when a product is as solid as this, I understand what the cost does. It helps them to make sure it stays that way. If you want a reliable, solid product, you're going to pay more."
"PRA was one of the cheapest solutions that we evaluated."
"I rate the product's pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is high, and ten is low. It is an expensive product."
"I wasn't directly involved in the licensing and pricing, but I can say that PRA is licensed per endpoint added to the Vault. I would advise users to take frequent exports of their license usage package; it's a simple feature that provides a spreadsheet of every machine in the Vault. This helps to cut down on duplicate licenses, which can happen by adding the same endpoint using an IP address and a fully qualified domain name, for instance. The implementation is an additional cost, and they offer several tiers, so the price varies. There are also some optional add-ons, so I would advise people to research the product well and find out precisely what they need regarding features. The Advanced Web Access add-on provides some required functionality when interfacing with websites; that's one to consider."
"The price is pretty expensive, but you get what you pay for and this is a great product."
"Its price is pretty good for the features and services that it provides. It is not outrageous. I'm not aware of any additional charges or anything like that."
"My client found the solution a bit expensive but considering their use case and requirements, they didn't have any other choice. As far as I know, implementation and licensing are the only costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Guacamole?
I'm using Apache Guacamole as a gateway.
What needs improvement with Apache Guacamole?
The solution's USB redirection could be improved. If the machine has a USB port, I'm not able to redirect it. The solution should include FX protocol instead of RDP.
What advice do you have for others considering Apache Guacamole?
We are using the latest version of Apache Guacamole. Only one administrator is required to manage the solution. Overall, I rate Apache Guacamole eight and a half out of ten.
What do you like most about BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access?
The product has improved remote support capabilities since it works fine.
What needs improvement with BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access?
The issue I found with the product revolves around the fact that RDP and SSH sessions take too much time, making it an area of concern where improvements are required. The product should be able to...
What is your primary use case for BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access?
I use the tool in my lab. I am involved in the product's testing phase in my lab, where I am trying to check out the solution.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Bomgar Privileged Access
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Horizon Beverage, Air Liquide, Gateway Bank of Florida
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access. Updated: June 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.