ABBYY Vantage vs UiPath Document Understanding comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 10, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

ABBYY Vantage
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (6th)
UiPath Document Understanding
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the market share of ABBYY Vantage is 22.4% and it decreased by 6.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of UiPath Document Understanding is 19.1% and it increased by 69.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
Unique Categories:
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
2.3%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Lucas Ivantes - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 26, 2024
Easy to use, flexible to deploy, and trains different documents easily
We resell the product. We are partners. We do not have internal uses of the product. I do not contact support. I contact a representative usually. He escalates our calls to support. I am part of the initial deployment team. The accuracy of the results produced by the solution's AI document processing is okay. It's good that it supports multi-page documents and tables. It's good that the product also has machine learning. We can enable it, and it will improve over time. Machine learning is one of the main things we use. We can train a small batch of documents from Brazil, and it can improve over time without needing to train a lot of documents. Our customers are spread out. We have tried Portuguese, Spanish, Hindi, Chinese, French, and Italian documents. We had a good experience with the languages we tried. We have used the AI extraction models mostly for invoices. The main thing is to get the process up and running quickly. On the commercial front, there are many tables. We can quickly add a document in development and build a scenario for a demo. The implementation is very quick. We have five different customers in a matter of months. Using ABBYY has helped us reduce manual data entry and free up staff for other tasks. Sometimes, the customer already has an ERP that does the extraction. We are just doing it upfront. The percentage of documents that go straight through processing has improved over time as the models get more advanced. It is the main metric we look at. ABBYY provides "straight-through" processing, in which content is automatically extracted and delivered without manual processing. The quality is good. We set the rules. If it goes through, it means that none of the rules were broken. The main problem is to get the percentage high. We apply manual reviews, too. A percentage of the requests with an error in some rules go through a manual review. We haven't had any solutions in production before. We have had backend solutions, but they were not IDP and were not comparable with ABBYY Vantage. Customers see an advantage in them. It is an extra cost. The price is justified by the ease of implementation of training different documents. If we just need one document or invoice, other products may be more cost-effective. The main thing for me is to enable the users to do the manual reviews and improve the results themselves without needing to train or do a big batch of training with the team. The sooner we can get people trained in the process, the faster we will get the results. The newer tools coming up have more natural language, AI, and large language models. ABBYY is one of the best tools I used. Overall, I rate the solution an 8 out of 10.
SY
Mar 1, 2024
Helps to reduce human error, and fully automate 95 percent of processes, but the price is high
The UiPath APIs lack reliable table parsing. The accuracy of document extraction depends on the document's original format. For rich text documents, the accuracy is generally good. However, scanned documents like PDFs or images present a challenge and often yield lower accuracy. Another challenge arises when dealing with multiple documents in a single image. This scenario is common in invoice automation, where a single image might contain several invoices. Furthermore, processing files containing multiple document types, such as multiple invoices in one file, can be problematic. Currently, the system assumes each uploaded file represents a single document or invoice, which is not always the case. To address these challenges, I propose enhancing UiPath Document Understanding to analyze the entire document, not just individual pages. This would allow the system to identify individual invoices within a multi-page document and assign extracted data to the corresponding invoice. I would like custom key value integration instead of generic key values for extraction. The cost of UiPath Document Understanding has room for improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Verification station is a really good feature. It allows part-owners to be able to take a look at what comes out of the tool after a document, such as an invoice, is run through ABBYY. It also allows them to update it if there are any mistakes. So, it kind of gives them a little more control over what goes through the system and lessens the errors."
"The most valuable feature of ABBYY Vantage is flexibility. You are able to edit at a granular level providing good control over the process. Additionally, the brochures and guides were helpful in learning the solution."
"There are a lot of options in ABBYY FlexiCapture, and it is very vast. I have worked with multiple OCR tools, and I found ABBYY FlexiCapture to be the most accurate tool."
"Allows us to run through documents and extract information."
"ABBYY Vantage has been designed as a user-friendly solution, making the setup process require only a couple of days."
"The most valuable features have been the rate of recognition and the structured documents."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to capture data from documents with different formats."
"The machine learning capability is pretty good."
"The validation process is easy. The Validation Station shows you the extracted data on one side and the document on the other, so you can easily scroll down and check if the data is accurate. You just need to click a checkbox. If you don't think it is fine, you have the option to add an exception. Based on that exception, you can create multiple conditions for how to address the same issue if it happens again."
"UiPath provides a useful feature that allows us to classify documents as invoices or not."
"Document Understanding's best features are the action center and verification mode."
"The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined."
"Document classification is very good."
"Invoice processing is the most valuable feature. Most of my customers use Document Understanding for invoice processing. That's one of the most common use cases. Typically, each customer starts their RPA journey with the finance department because that's the area where you can see the most benefit."
"It shortens the time of extracting data by 70 to 80%."
"The machine learning (ML) extractor is valuable. It helps in extracting information from even unstructured documents. It can sometimes also extract information from a written document. Without much manual intervention, it is able to process the documents. This is a unique feature of UiPath Document Understanding."
 

Cons

"Quite complex, particularly for those who are not tech savvy."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"The accuracy changes depending on the scenario so you need to test it before committing to this solution."
"This solution could be improved by offering better integration with other platforms."
"The generic models have a lot of areas to improve. In our experience, we are not able to get good results in the generic models. From a developer's point of view, there could be more improvement if the source code is available on a broader scope"
"The solution needs more web or cloud-based development."
"This solution should have better integration with RPA solutions such as Blue Prism."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve the performance. We are looking for better performance because it can be a lengthy capture process and the accuracy needs to be enhanced when it comes to Arabic."
"At times, the scanning functionality of the tool may fail to generate accurate output, resulting in the need for manual input."
"They could work on the digitizing and classification of documents."
"Existing models have room for improvement."
"The interface has room for improvement."
"UiPath Document Understanding requires more database connectors."
"Making the design of Forms AI more flexible and accommodating to companies' branding preferences would be beneficial."
"The rising annual licensing cost of UiPath's Document Understanding product is a major turnoff for users."
"UiPath Document Understanding could be more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Most of our customers have purchased an annual license and if you have multiple developers from other companies, you can assign the license on a monthly basis to developers."
"The cost is per page we use. So, the number of pages we use will be its cost."
"We did not go with the licensed version of this solution."
"I give the price a six out of ten."
"Our company receives discounts because of our good partnership with the vendor and our vendor's partnership with ABBYY."
"Its price should be a little lower. It is a lot higher than the competition, and if they just break the gap a little, then more people might jump onto their product. Their price is definitely a deterrent in the few cases that I remember. They have monthly and yearly options, and if you want, they also have per project and per page options. They do charge extra for different types of installation. They have the standalone, which is pretty straightforward and a lot cheaper than the server installation. Server installation gives you a lot more, and it gives you control over the environment."
"The solution offers both cloud and on-premises models but the pricing is on the higher side."
"The price of this ABBYY FlexiCapture is a bit expensive and the price is based on how many documents have been captured. For example, one or two million captures."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution a nine."
"I find the pricing to be somewhat on the higher side."
"UiPath Document Understanding is priced high compared to its competition."
"One of the biggest challenges we face with UiPath is the pricing structure."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The price is on the high end."
"Its pricing can be looked into because it is on the higher side for developing economies, such as India, where the cost of labor is a little cheaper compared to advanced technologies."
"It's expensive, but you can reduce the price per license by getting more licenses. Overall, the pricing is okay."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ABBYY Vantage?
Vantage is flexible and customizable. It's a low-code/no-code tool, so you don't need to get into detailed coding. You can also use AI to accomplish medium-complex tasks.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ABBYY Vantage?
ABBYY's pricing could be improved. I feel like they are losing out on some business because of their pricing. They could expand their customer base by offering more flexible pricing options.
What needs improvement with ABBYY Vantage?
ABBYY's support model could be improved because we get some complaints from customers regarding the amount of time it takes and the kind of responses we get. They also need to improve their profess...
What do you like most about UiPath Document Understanding?
The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?
The product is not very costly in itself. It is part of the normal license. The solution’s cost increases for machine learning or artificial intelligence because we have to go for UiPath Orchestrat...
What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?
Sometimes, when the number of items is very large, the solution doesn't properly identify them. It's not 100% accurate, but it gives an 85% to 90% output. The solution doesn't work properly when to...
 

Also Known As

ABBYY FlexiCapture
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fujitsu, Plustek, Samsung, Panasonic, M-files
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ABBYY Vantage vs. UiPath Document Understanding and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,033 professionals have used our research since 2012.