HPE ProCurve and Cisco Nexus are competitors in the network switch market. While Cisco Nexus holds the edge with its advanced features and future-proofing, HPE ProCurve's strength lies in its attractive pricing and support.
Features: HPE ProCurve is known for reliability, scalability, and ease of integration, with advanced security features. Cisco Nexus is recognized for high performance, innovative technologies such as automation, and support for next-gen data centers.
Room for Improvement: HPE ProCurve could enhance its feature set to match higher-end demands. Improving automation integration and advanced data center capabilities would also benefit. Cisco Nexus may address setup complexity, optimize cost efficiency, and enhance ease of use for broader appeal.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProCurve provides straightforward deployment and dependable customer support, simplifying the setup process. Cisco Nexus, while more complex to deploy, offers comprehensive documentation and advanced configuration support, appealing to organizations with technical expertise.
Pricing and ROI: HPE ProCurve offers competitive pricing with a focus on low setup costs and good ROI. Cisco Nexus, despite its higher initial investment, is justified by extensive capabilities and long-term benefits, ideal for organizations prioritizing advanced functionality.
Speeding up our response times and reducing errors and incidents with automation and available APIs.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
The need to frequently contact support suggests we are not getting sufficient effectiveness from the service.
Initially, the stability of Cisco Nexus, particularly with the ACI, was problematic due to unstable codes, requiring replacements.
It is 60 to 70% stable, depending on usage intensity.
It might be pretty expensive for other companies.
When I talk about data centers, which are critical infrastructure and centralized application hubs, the Nexus platforms should be highly stable.
The solution is on-premises and stable.
When running bots, the system occasionally gets stuck, requiring reboots which result in memory loss and data loss.
The price of Cisco Nexus is on the higher side due to the premium services Cisco offers.
All solutions are very expensive and not an economy solution.
For market-related sites, AWS pricing becomes significantly higher compared to DigitalOcean.
It provides visibility and configuration options, aiding significantly in network management initiatives.
For us, we have a time advantage because we know the solution, and the technological refresh is easier.
I would recommend Cisco Nexus for large enterprises and the government sector, as they can afford it.
It offers easy scalability and migration between different configurations.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Nexus | 8.7% |
| HPE ProCurve | 11.6% |
| Other | 79.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 82 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
