NetAlly EtherScope nXG vs Wireshark comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

NetAlly EtherScope nXG
Ranking in Network Troubleshooting
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Network Diagnostics (1st)
Wireshark
Ranking in Network Troubleshooting
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of NetAlly EtherScope nXG is 12.5%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wireshark is 15.2%, up from 14.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Troubleshooting
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Dan Jones - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 23, 2022
Works well for wired and wireless networks, massively affects the efficiency and cost of troubleshooting, and pays for itself when you use it onsite just once or twice
We should be able to do online wireless design through Link-Live. We should be able to take the information that we've gathered and send a customer the way to fix it, in terms of moving APs and how that would affect things, within Link-Live. The ease of use of AirMapper could do with some improvements. I don't use the AirMapper Site Survey app a lot. I have used it recently with the new 6 GHz device because effectively, it is the only device I have that can do that. For most of my site surveys, I use a different tool. AirMapper is very quick and easy once everything is on there, but I would like to see an improvement on how you get things on there. Currently, rather than being able to build up buildings or a site of things, every map is an individual piece. We should be able to set up an AirMapper survey easily and more effectively. At the moment, we just have separate floor plans. It'd be great to be able to build a building and tell where different floors are so that if it hears an AP on the floor below, it doesn't put two APs, one on that floor and one on the other floor, and it knows that there are two floors here. One is on top of the other, and it won't put the AP at both places. It would put it on one of the floors where it would be strongest. This would be one of the biggest improvements.
VP
Jul 26, 2023
Excels at analyzing and decoding packet capture files and powerful tool for troubleshooting network issues
One thing that I feel is currently missing in Wireshark is the ability to perform deep analytics on traffic streams after they have been decoded. While it may not be the major use case right now, it would be beneficial to have some sort of leveraging of artificial intelligence or machine learning to automatically detect threats or vulnerabilities based on specific types of network traffic. Predictive analysis of this nature is currently absent in Wireshark. So in future releases, it would be great to see more robust analytics for traffic streams in the next version of Wireshark. One improvement I would suggest is having more graphical representations of network topologies in Wireshark. Currently, when we deploy Wireshark to collect streams, we lack visibility into how different entities are connected at that specific time. Having a network topology view of connected devices, showing the source and destination, would be really beneficial. For example, in DNS troubleshooting, visualizing the network path can help recreate certain issues. Unfortunately, this feature is not currently available in Wireshark.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Another good thing I really liked was that it would not only tell me the IP address, but it would tell me more info. It would grab the CDP off of the CDP profile and read all the info it could get, so I knew what I was looking at."
"It clearly depicts the information we're looking for on a 10Gig testing, and we can also verify 100Gig links with it between our routing sites."
"The whole product is valuable because it's really a bunch of features that make up the one testing utility. Between auto tests, wireless assessments, its ability to do iPerf speed and traffic testing, as well as packet captures — all of those really contribute to a very successful product and allow me to do my job in a better manner."
"When it comes to that remote troubleshooting perspective of being able to survey an area to see if there are problems, make adjustments, and then have that same individual resurvey that same area, I don't have to send people to a week long class on how to use the device. I know I am getting consistent results, which can verify near real-time, and whether or not the changes that I have implemented solve the problem."
"It cuts the time down in half. You don't need to get a laptop out and do different testing. We can just grab this one tool, bring it, and do all our network testing, surveying, and reviews to figure out what the problems are with just one device, instead of having to use multiple people and devices to do that. You cut down time by 50% because you won't normally need multiple people onsite. A lot of times, you can do everything with one person and one tool."
"The things that I find most valuable are the Wi-Fi app and the Discovery app. Those two things help a lot when I'm doing the initial discovery of a space. I also use the AutoTest feature quite a lot, especially if I'm troubleshooting."
"One of the key measurements that we use out of the device is the channel utilization measurement, how much traffic is on the air in a given channel. That's the most valuable feature for us. The ability to make a very fast measurement of how much traffic is on the air is a key value. Otherwise we'd have to do a packet capture and do some analysis. It speeds up our testing."
"My impression of the ease of use is that it definitely is easy to use both the handheld device and the app walking around."
"The strongest feature of this solution, is the ability it gives us to carry out deep-packet inspections on our network, particularly when a function isn't performing as it should."
"Wireshark is very user-friendly; even someone with basic IT knowledge can use it."
"The feature to incorporate Voice over IP (VoIP) incidents into network traffic analysis is valuable. Capturing voice or SIP communication allows for examination of interactions between SIP clients and SIP servers. This helps the team investigate or analyze issues related to call center servers and operators."
"Wireshark's best feature is that it's adaptive, which means it's the go-to tool for network-related developers."
"The initial setup is simple."
"Wireshark's best features are that it lets us see what traffic is in the network and what data should be encrypted."
"I can save the traffic and analysis when I want to. Also, it's especially helpful to follow the stream (TCP, UDP, etc.)."
"Being able to dissect email data and figure out what is inside email messages was the most valuable feature. Such a feature is pretty helpful for an ongoing forensic investigation or when there is a potential insider threat that you are trying to investigate. It allows you to see the network activity of the users you are investigating. It also gives you more visibility into your network. It was very easy to set up. There is a lot of information out there on Google and YouTube about how to use it. There is also community support. If you have any trouble, it is pretty easy to find an answer online. You will have to do some digging only if you have a very specific use case."
 

Cons

"One point of contention might be that when we were starting it up for the first time, there was a little bit of confusion about registration and getting the proper support plans applied. So, that could be more streamlined, but that's not uncommon in the industry."
"The largest complaint that we get is the battery life on the unit. If you are using it heavily, you get about five hours of usage out of it. In an eight hour day, that is not perfect for us. We would like more battery usage. The battery thing is annoying."
"The battery life should be improved."
"The user interface could be a little bit more streamlined, a little bit easier. Sometimes it's hard to find a specific thing that you're looking for. In terms of hardware-based improvement, the battery would be the biggest issue. The battery goes out very quickly."
"NetAlly EtherScope nXG's reporting and table qualification could be improved."
"The only improvement I can come up with is the battery life. If they could improve the battery life, that would be great."
"I use the NetAlly site and one of the things I don't like about the topology map, something I wish I could fix, is that the map kind of jiggles if you don't adjust any of the settings."
"There are some inconsistencies in how it uploads the test results to the cloud, but it might just need a minor improvement on the software side. When you don't have an internet connection on the EtherScope when you do the testing, it saves the results into memory. When it has an internet connection, it uploads those results, but it doesn't work all the time. Sometimes, you need to manually push it."
"There is a disadvantage when it comes to sampling intervals. Additionally, I've heard from a colleague that Wireshark might be less effective in the voice domain."
"The initial setup depends upon the basics. You need to have a clear understanding of the basics."
"DNS could be improved."
"I would like to see Wireshark improve the ease of application of the command. The command is very powerful, but not easy to apply."
"I wish the filters were a little bit more prepopulated."
"The only thing that I don't like is sometimes there is an update, and something that I was using is either no longer there or it has changed."
"You need some basic knowledge to work with Wireshark. Maybe it could be more user-friendly just for new users. Just for the new generation."
"It needs the ability to follow multiple interfaces for specific traffic from different network zones/virtual networks. It would help to understand how any packet is going through the network."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the average network shop, the cost is a bit high. In a lot of organizations, people don't share test devices between teams. Generally, you need a device for the network team and a device for the system team, the security team, etc. While the cost is a little on the high side, that is offset by the regular updates and continued improvements that NetAlly adds to the device. Those improvements continue to increase the perceived value of the device."
"The pricing was a little bit high, but I understand that when you are getting multiple tools."
"It is relatively high-priced and it should certainly not get any more expensive. I would like it to be $1,000 less, and I think everyone would say that. And of course, maintenance is also a recurring cost."
"It is worth it. The cost benefit of Link-Live is massive because it is included with the cost of the device and the licensing. A lot of people miss that part of it. It is not just the device that you get but it is the ability to look at all of that data later on. You're not having to do all of that on the device. You can just be there, use the device, and then look at the data from the comfort of your office or home afterward."
"I don't consider the pricing to be a problem. It's not a cheap device, but it's a very capable device for the money. It's a good value."
"NetAlly EtherScope nXG is priced too much and needs to come down by about 15 percent of its current price."
"It's a pricey device, but I see value in it from a business perspective."
"The cost is not cheap but it totally pays for itself because it can do so much."
"Wireshark is free software, so you don't have to pay any licensing fee. Individual people can use it and then donate to Wireshark."
"We are using a freeware version of this solution, so there are no licence costs involved."
"It's a stand-alone tool. If there is a commercial license for it I am unaware of it."
"It's free."
"Wireshark is open-source and free of charge."
"Wireshark is free of charge, and there's no license involved."
"It is free to download and install. It runs on multiple platforms, so how can you go wrong?"
"The solution is open source so is free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Troubleshooting solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
11%
Educational Organization
11%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetAlly EtherScope nXG?
Being able to do a Wi-Fi walk-around survey with a handheld tool is one of the most valuable features of NetAlly EtherScope nXG.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetAlly EtherScope nXG?
NetAlly EtherScope nXG is priced too much and needs to come down by about 15 percent of its current price.
What needs improvement with NetAlly EtherScope nXG?
NetAlly EtherScope nXG's reporting and table qualification could be improved. The disadvantages of NetAlly EtherScope nXG are its password life and end reporting.
What needs improvement with Wireshark?
I wish the filters were a little bit more prepopulated. It would have been easy to hit a drop-down and select a filter. If I only wanted to look at DCP, UDP, or IP, it would be easy to filter it ou...
 

Also Known As

EtherScope nXG, EtherScope, netAlly EtherScope, OptiView XG
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Comversion, ADP, Talbots
Find out what your peers are saying about NetAlly EtherScope nXG vs. Wireshark and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.