HPE OneView vs Nagios Core comparison

HPE OneView and Nagios Core are both competitors in the IT management and monitoring category, each known for targeting different aspects of infrastructure management. HPE OneView seems to have the upper hand in centralized management and automation features, while Nagios Core stands out for being open-source with extensive customizability.

Features: HPE OneView provides centralized management along with automation for time-saving tasks, efficient server profile management, and infrastructure health monitoring. Users benefit from a streamlined process for resource management and quick server deployment. Nagios Core offers flexibility and customizability with robust monitoring capabilities and extensive plugin availability, which makes it adaptable for various infrastructure needs.

Room for Improvement: HPE OneView could improve in cloud integration, speed in profile deployment, and broader equipment support. There's also a desire for more customization in reporting and faster support resolutions. Nagios Core would benefit from a user-friendly interface, cloud hosting capabilities, and better error reporting along with a web-based configuration system to extend accessibility to non-Linux users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment is primarily on-premises for both, with some hybrid options. HPE OneView experiences mixed reviews on technical support, from excellent to challenging initial interactions. Users find direct engagement with support staff beneficial. Nagios Core users appreciate self-management ease but often handle support internally, due to lack of formal support in the free version.

Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView involves substantial licensing costs justified by efficiency improvements, showing positive ROI with reduced manual interventions. Nagios Core's lack of licensing fees offers cost savings, but necessitates potential investments in skilled personnel for customization and management.