Azure Data Factory vs Mule Anypoint Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Data Factory
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (1st), Cloud Data Warehouse (3rd)
Mule Anypoint Platform
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Integration category, the market share of Azure Data Factory is 9.6% and it decreased by 29.4% compared to the previous year. The market share of Mule Anypoint Platform is 3.3% and it increased by 23.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
Unique Categories:
Cloud Data Warehouse
13.6%
Business-to-Business Middleware
11.9%
Workload Automation
0.8%
 

Featured Reviews

PA
Jul 17, 2023
A tool that offers overall efficiency to its users, particularly in the area of data warehousing
There aren't many third-party extensions or plugins available in the solution. Adjunction or addition of third-party extensions or plugins to Azure Data Factory can be a great improvement in the tool. Creation of custom codes, custom extensions, or third-party extensions, like Lookup extension, should be made possible in the tool. I am unsure if Azure Data Factory bridges the gap between on-premises, cloud, and hybrid solutions. I would like to see a version that would work equally well in both on-premises and cloud environments. I would like to see the aforementioned offerings made to customers as valuable alternatives to the old SSIS tool.
SK
Jun 17, 2022
Increases productivity, speeds up integration, and helps with effective re-authentication
What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations. In the next release, I would like to see deployment automations. I would also like MuleSoft to come up with a central platform because with on-premises and hybrid environments, where some are cloud-based applications and others are on premises applications, a DPC setup has to be done. It would be good if they can implement one centralized user interface that provides all of the facilities.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution will allow the organisation to improve its existing data offerings over time by adding predictive analytics, data sharing via APIs and other enhancements readily."
"The most valuable feature is the copy activity."
"On the tool itself, we've never experienced any bugs or glitches. There haven't been crashes. Stability has been good."
"The user interface is very good. It makes me feel very comfortable when I am using the tool."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Data Factory is that it has a good combination of flexibility, fine-tuning, automation, and good monitoring."
"The solution is okay."
"It's extremely consistent."
"The most valuable feature of this solution would be ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The platform's cloud integration capabilities are good."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
 

Cons

"Sometimes I need to do some coding, and I'd like to avoid that. I'd like no-code integrations."
"It can improve from the perspective of active logging. It can provide active logging information."
"The initial setup is not very straightforward."
"The support and the documentation can be improved."
"There's space for improvement in the development process of the data pipelines."
"There are limitations when processing more than one GD file."
"When working with AWS, we have noticed that the difference between ADF and AWS is that AWS is more customer-focused. They're more responsive compared to any other company. ADF is not as good as AWS, but it should be. If AWS is ten out of ten, ADF is around eight out of ten. I think AWS is easier to understand from the GUI perspective compared to ADF."
"Data Factory's cost is too high."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"It should give better control over account management."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Understanding the pricing model for Data Factory is quite complex."
"The price is fair."
"The licensing cost is included in the Synapse."
"The solution's pricing is competitive."
"The pricing is a bit on the higher end."
"I would not say that this product is overly expensive."
"ADF is cheaper compared to AWS."
"Our licensing fees are approximately 15,000 ($150 USD) per month."
"The product is still very expensive."
"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."
"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."
"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."
"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?
AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?
Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?
Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...
What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Data Integrator
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa
VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Mule Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.