Azure Data Factory vs Snowflake comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 6, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Data Factory
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (1st)
Snowflake
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Azure Data Factory is 13.6%, up from 13.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snowflake is 30.6%, up from 23.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
Unique Categories:
Data Integration
9.6%
Data Warehouse
16.5%
 

Q&A Highlights

RK
Oct 04, 2023
 

Featured Reviews

PA
Jul 17, 2023
A tool that offers overall efficiency to its users, particularly in the area of data warehousing
There aren't many third-party extensions or plugins available in the solution. Adjunction or addition of third-party extensions or plugins to Azure Data Factory can be a great improvement in the tool. Creation of custom codes, custom extensions, or third-party extensions, like Lookup extension, should be made possible in the tool. I am unsure if Azure Data Factory bridges the gap between on-premises, cloud, and hybrid solutions. I would like to see a version that would work equally well in both on-premises and cloud environments. I would like to see the aforementioned offerings made to customers as valuable alternatives to the old SSIS tool.
Chris Hastie - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 27, 2023
Strong data sharing and replication capabilities
The main thing I'm excited to see at some point with Snowflake, hopefully - I've not seen anything coming out of it yet - is Git integration into the worksheets and the UI. Sometimes it can be tricky to manage multiple environments if you're purely using Snowflake as your scripting and pipeline environment. This is handleable, so if you use third-party tools like DBT, Matillion, etc., those can help. But if you're looking purely within Snowflake itself, it'd be great to have some form of Git support. For the future releases, I would love it if they one day decided to implement their own GUI-based transformation tool environment. I know that many competitors like Azure have to Sign Up, and Azure Data Factory can sit in. However, Azure is a very different beast that serves all sorts of different processes, and an argument could be made for whether it's the best to each of those or not. Specifically within Snowflake, I would love it if they could get some form of orchestration built-in for transformation that doesn't have to be controlled directly through code all the time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I enjoy the ease of use for the backend JSON generator, the deployment solution, and the template management."
"On the tool itself, we've never experienced any bugs or glitches. There haven't been crashes. Stability has been good."
"Feature-wise, one of the most valuable ones is the data flows introduced recently in the solution."
"The most valuable features are data transformations."
"This solution has provided us with an easier, and more efficient way to carry out data migration tasks."
"I am one hundred percent happy with the stability."
"The data factory agent is quite good and programming or defining the value of jobs, processes, and activities is easy."
"I like its integration with SQL pools, its ability to work with Databricks, its pipelines, and the serverless architecture are the most effective features."
"The syntax is advanced which reduces the time to write code."
"The technical support is pretty good, particularly if you are a more technical user."
"It is quite easy to manage."
"Snowflake has a variety of other ETL provisions that they provide. You can use your own ETL pipeline. Additionally, they provide adapters, and they are always evolving, it is a well-developed solution."
"Can be leveraged with respect to better performance, auto tuning and competition."
"Snowflake is an enormously useful platform. The Snowpipe feature is valuable because it allows us to load terabytes and petabytes of data into the data mart at a very low cost."
"Once you have finished your designs they can be easily imported to Snowflake and the information can be readily accessed without an IT expert."
"The Time Travel feature is helpful for accessing historical data and the ability to clone external tables is useful."
 

Cons

"Lacks a decent UI that would give us a view of the kinds of requests that come in."
"Currently, smaller businesses face a disadvantage in terms of pricing, and reducing costs could address this issue."
"The product's technical support has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Integration of data lineage would be a nice feature in terms of DevOps integration. It would make implementation for a company much easier. I'm not sure if that's already available or not. However, that would be a great feature to add if it isn't already there."
"We require Azure Data Factory to be able to connect to Google Analytics."
"The solution needs to be more connectable to its own services."
"Real-time replication is required, and this is not a simple task."
"Data Factory could be improved in terms of data transformations by adding more metadata extractions."
"They should improve the reporting tools."
"For the Snowflake database, there should be some third-party features for the ETL. It would also be good to be able to use some kind of controls to get the data either from another database or a flat file. Its price should be improved. It should be cheaper than Microsoft."
"We are yet to figure out how to integrate tools, such as Liquibase, to release changes to our data warehouse model."
"They have a new console, but I couldn't figure out anything in the new console. So, if I shift to the old console, I can figure out where to create the database schema and other things, but I have no idea where to go in the new console. That's one thing they can improve. I don't know why they created a new console to confuse. The old, classic console is much better."
"Snowflake has to build more capabilities because they have only built very few adapters, but they're growing and they're building. They should provide provisions to collect ETL pipeline capabilities, reduce developer work, and make more rapid application development, rather than some customizations. There are very few options, but they are building. I hope they will build ETL rapid application development provisions with more variety."
"The aspect of it that was more complicated was stored procedures. It does not support SQL language-based stored procedures. You have to write in JavaScript. If they supported SQL language and stored procedures, it would make migration from on-prem much simpler. In most cases, if an on-prem solution has stored procedures, they're usually written in SQL. They're not written as what most on-prem DBMS would refer to as an external stored procedure, which is what these feel like to most people because they're written in a language outside of SQL."
"Product activation queries can't be changed while executing."
"They don't have any SLAs in place. It would be better if they did."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It seems very low initially, but as the data grows, the solution’s bills grow exponentially."
"In terms of licensing costs, we pay somewhere around S14,000 USD per month. There are some additional costs. For example, we would have to subscribe to some additional computing and for elasticity, but they are minimal."
"For our use case, it is not expensive. We take into the picture everything: resources, learning curve, and maintenance."
"This is a cost-effective solution."
"My company is on a monthly subscription for Azure Data Factory, but it's more of a pay-as-you-go model where your monthly invoice depends on how many resources you use. On a scale of one to five, pricing for Azure Data Factory is a four. It's just the usage fees my company pays monthly."
"The licensing is a pay-as-you-go model, where you pay for what you consume."
"It's not particularly expensive."
"The solution's fees are based on a pay-per-minute use plus the amount of data required to process."
"Pricing is based on usage. It is the most expensive of our data tools."
"On average, with the number of queries that we run, we pay approximately $200 USD per month."
"The price of Snowflake is very reasonable."
"Snowflake is cost-effective. However, the cost can depend on how it's being used and how efficiently the code is written. If engineers don't write efficient code and usage is billed based on processing, it can become costly. If they write optimal code and choose the best solution, it can reduce costs in comparison to other options, such as Oracle."
"The pricing for Snowflake is competitive."
"There is a license needed to use this solution. There are a few licensing options available. They have a pay-as-you-go option, but it is recommended to pay upfront."
"The tool's pricing is based on the number of queries you want on your database. The cost is small. To get the tool's pricing, you can do the math based on the cost per query, which is $0.002. If you're running your queries frequently, your charges will be higher than running fewer queries."
"The solution is costly, making it unsuitable for midsize organizations due to its price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
28%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?
AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?
Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?
Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...
What do you like most about Snowflake?
The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake?
The tool's pricing is based on the number of queries you want on your database. The cost is small. To get the tool's pricing, you can do the math based on the cost per query, which is $0.002. If yo...
What needs improvement with Snowflake?
I can only access Snowflake from the web. It would be better if we could have an app that we can install locally on our laptops to connect to the server without needing to go to the web page. Apart...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Snowflake Computing
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa
Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Snowflake and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.