Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs CoreOS Clair comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Container Security
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (7th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Compliance Management (4th)
Aqua Cloud Security Platform
Ranking in Container Security
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (11th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (11th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (8th), Software Supply Chain Security (6th), DevSecOps (5th)
CoreOS Clair
Ranking in Container Security
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Aqua Cloud Security Platform is 9.6%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CoreOS Clair is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security
Unique Categories:
Vulnerability Management
1.6%
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
4.4%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

PK
Jun 4, 2024
Improves our cloud security, is flexible, and user-friendly
The solution is easy to use. The evidence-based reporting is helpful to our DevOps team who manually mitigate the vulnerabilities. Singularity Cloud Security offers a flexible agentless vulnerability scanning solution that allows me to receive alerts directly to my personal email, a feature missing from AWS GuardDuty. Evidence-based reporting that demonstrates how a vulnerability can be exploited is crucial because it allows me to prioritize alerts based on their severity level. This ensures I focus on the most critical issues first. Singularity Cloud Security has improved our organization's security by proactively identifying vulnerabilities that could have significant detrimental effects. It has decreased the number of false positives. Before implementing Singularity Cloud Security our mean time to detection was three to four days. Singularity Cloud Security has significantly improved our mean time to remediation from one hour to just 15 minutes.
Lizeth Zuluaga - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 16, 2022
The most advanced solution in the market for container security
Aqua Security allows us to check for vulnerabilities in the CI/CD pipeline, so application teams can remediate issues before going into production Aqua Security helps us to check the vulnerability of image assurance and check for malware. In the next release, Aqua Security should add the ability…
HB
Jul 6, 2022
Excellent detection accuracy
I use CoreOS Clair to detect OS components in images and containers CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy. An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects. They should disclose these details immediately in a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."
"PingSafe stands out for its user-friendly interface and intuitive software, making it easy to navigate and use."
"There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to detect vulnerabilities inside AWS resources and its ability to rescan after a specific duration set by the administrator."
"The cloud misconfiguration is the most valuable feature."
"It is fairly simple. Anybody can use it."
"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"We use Aqua Security for the container security features."
"Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar to a sandbox environment."
"The container security element of this product has been very valuable to our organization."
"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and manage."
"From what I understand, the initial setup is simple."
"The solution was very user-friendly."
"The DTA, which stands for Dynamic Threat Analysis, allows me to analyze Docker images in a sandbox environment before deployment, helping me anticipate risks."
"The CSPM product is great at securing our cloud accounts and I really like the runtime protection for containers and functions too."
"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."
 

Cons

"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."
"In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"We'd like to have better notifications. We'd like them to happen faster."
"Implementing single sign-on requires a pre-class account feature, which is currently not available."
"A beneficial improvement for PingSafe would be integration with Jira, allowing for a more streamlined ticketing system."
"They need more experienced support personnel."
"PingSafe can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
"The integrations on CICD could be improved. If Aqua had more plugins or container images to integrate and automate more easily on CICD, it would be better."
"We would like to see an improvement in the overview visibility that this solution offers."
"In the next release, Aqua Security should add the ability to automatically send reports to customers."
"Aqua Security could provide more open documentation so that their learning resources can be more easily accessed and searched through online. Right now, a lot of the documentation is closed and not available to the public."
"The user interface could be improved, especially in terms of organization and clarity."
"There's room for improvement, particularly in management capabilities as it may not be comprehensive enough for all customers, and it has been lacking in the realm of cloud security posture management."
"They want to release improvements to their product to work with other servers because now there are more focused on the Kubernetes environment. They need to improve the normal servers. I would like to have more options."
"Aqua Security lacks a lot in reporting."
"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"PingSafe's pricing is good because it provides us with a solution."
"It is not that expensive. There are some tools that are double the cost of PingSafe. It is good on the pricing side."
"PingSafe's primary advantage is its ability to consolidate multiple tools into a single user interface, but, beyond this convenience, it may not offer significant additional benefits to justify its price."
"PingSafe is cost-effective for the amount of infrastructure we have. It's reasonable for what they offer compared to our previous solution. It's at least 25 percent to 30 percent less."
"PingSafe falls within the typical price range for cloud security platforms."
"The features included in PingSafe justify its price point."
"The cost for PingSafe is average when compared to other CSPM tools."
"We have an enterprise license. It is affordable. I'm not sure, but I think we pay 150,000 rupees per month."
"They were reasonable with their pricing. They were pretty down-to-earth about the way they pitched their product and the way they tried to close the deal. They were one of the rare companies that approached the whole valuation in a way that made sense for our company, for our needs, and for their own requirements as well... They will accommodate your needs if they are able to understand them and they're stated clearly."
"The pricing of this solution could be improved."
"It comes at a reasonable cost."
"Aqua Security is not cheap, and it's not very expensive, such as Splunk, they are in the middle."
"Dealing with licensing costs isn't my responsibility, but I know that the licenses don't depend on the number of users, but instead are priced according to your workload."
"CoreOS Clair is open-source and free of charge."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting feat...
What do you think of Aqua Security vs Prisma Cloud?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valu...
What do you like most about Aqua Security?
Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aqua Security?
It comes at a reasonable cost. When compared to Prisma Cloud, it is more budget-friendly.
What do you like most about CoreOS Clair?
CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy.
What needs improvement with CoreOS Clair?
An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it det...
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
Aqua Security Platform, CloudSploit, Argon
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
HPE Salesforce Telstra Ellie Mae Cathay Pacific HomeAway
eBay, Veritas, Verizon, SalesForce
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security. Updated: June 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.