Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Microsoft Azure Container Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Containers as a Service (CaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 10.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 22.7% mindshare in CSC, compared to Microsoft’s 24.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Amazon Elastic Container Se...
Read 50 Amazon Elastic Container Service reviews
  • 986 Views
  • 207 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure Container S...
Read 8 Microsoft Azure Container Service reviews
  • 288 Views
  • 288 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Container Service and Microsoft Azure Container Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Containers as a Service (CaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,883 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...
Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Container Management (8th)
Microsoft Azure Container S...
Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Containers as a Service (CaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 22.7%, down from 38.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Container Service is 24.2%, down from 30.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Containers as a Service (CaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amazon Elastic Container Service22.7%
Microsoft Azure Container Service24.2%
Other53.1%
Containers as a Service (CaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
Horizontal scaling is streamlined when deploying modern workloads
Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously. This limitation makes it challenging to define a balanced scale-out automation since a well-written software should balance between processing and memory.
Read full review
PuneetKaura - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive ecosystem enhances development and cost management capabilities
The CI/CD capabilities are important because we do development. We use both development and production on Microsoft Azure. The CI/CD capabilities help in the development process. For the technical side, I would need to get back to some of my programmers, but we use the complete Microsoft Azure side for all of our development work. The CI/CD helps in the complete process for our team. As we move into the use of Microsoft Azure Container Service, it will make us more flexible and probably reduce our costs down the line. They can probably handle peak traffic and other things better than the older way of doing it. Microsoft Azure Container Service helps to optimize resources and save costs by allowing our product to handle it through this containerization method. When there is not too much traffic, we will be able to bring it down to the minimum, which would give us good cost savings. For our usage of Microsoft Azure Container Service, it is already helping us. For improvements, I don't have any recommendations currently because we have just gotten into it. What is available is good for the work we do. Regarding monitoring tools in AKS, we use them and understand how the environments are working through the tools. We use those for analytics and scaling of the environments. They help us in all our environments, and we can look into them. As required, we can downscale, upscale, and perform other operations because of the available tools.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's quick and easy to have the solution working."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service has multiple valuable features like load balancers and autoscalers."
"Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address and resolve them. The product helps to have a global file system. Also, it helps in data replication from region to region."
"The containerization is a valuable feature for us."
"I like Amazon EC2 Container Service's elasticity."
"Scalability and availability are the most valuable features of Amazon Elastic Container Service."
"I use the tool to manage containerized applications. What I like about Amazon ECS is the interface it provides. Although the configurations can be extensive, such as setting up auto-scaling groups and configuring separate tasks and services for each application, the interface makes it manageable."
"The solution is user-friendly."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service pros
"The most valuable feature is that you don't have to maintain the infrastructure."
"The most valuable features are that it is simple, and the compression of the data."
"Visualization is the most important feature."
"Storage is one of the most beneficial features of cloud providers, specifically Azure because when you are working in their cloud environment, you can easily use a storage interface and a storage object that is provided by Microsoft Azure. In a local environment, you have to be involved in establishing and setting up distributed storage file systems for containers which are very difficult and complex. In a cloud environment, you are not concerned about the storage and the dashboard provides you with storage objects with high availability."
"It's a great product if you are in a Microsoft environment."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has a good level of stability."
"The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs."
 

Cons

"Support could be better with response time and knowledge of staff."
"They could provide easier options for third-party integrations similar to internal AWS services."
"The tool initially required a significant amount of development time on the backend, but in terms of efficiency, it's a one-time effort."
"The product should improve its price."
"The solution's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"EC2 is not self-explanatory enough."
"The product can become expensive if you don't choose what you want."
"The solution is expensive compared to other alternatives like Azure."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service cons
"The customization is an area that needs improvement."
"In the future, I would like to see it generalized and have the ability to better integrate with open-source tools."
"I wasn't very impressed with the documentation."
"f Microsoft Azure can provide GUI dashboards for end-users and administrators to work separately to manage all the Kubernetes clusters without a need to connect to Azure environments and through CLI it would be better."
"Standard support could be more helpful and responsive."
"Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive."
"In terms of the container strategy, they need to make it more compliant with the Linux OS."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service is average."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service's price is good."
"The tool's licensing is monthly."
"The solution's cost could be reduced."
"Licensing can be purchased directly from AWS or used with existing licenses, depending on the company's preference. The licensing structure is complex and depends on factors such as machine size, number of processors, and Container size. Companies have dedicated staff members managing license considerations full-time to find the most cost-effective options. Also, I have seen some companies opt for a combination of AWS and Azure, using more of Azure for Microsoft licenses due to potentially lower costs compared to AWS."
"The pricing is good."
"I don't know the exact amount we were charged for our use of ECS, but I do know that it can be costly, especially when there is a bug or an error caused by default configurations."
"The tool's cost is good."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service pricing and cost advice
"The solution's pricing is reasonable."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has costs but in the container environment, there are no costs because it is open source and we are using Docker as the container engine in the master and worker nodes established in the Azure environment."
"The costs depend on the resources that you use, and there is a cost-management system to help calculate it."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Containers as a Service (CaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,883 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
7%
Transportation Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?
Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Elastic Container Service?
The product's pricing is good.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?
The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Container Service?
Better triggers around when we change or when we increase and decrease the environment would be helpful. The cost of Microsoft Azure Container Service could be better. There are many programs that ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Container Service?
We are a SaaS software company, so we use the solution for putting our product and then going back to customers. Approximately 15 to 20 people are currently working with Microsoft Azure Container S...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
Compared 56% of the time
HashiCorp Nomad vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
HashiCorp Nomad vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
Compared 18% of the time
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service
Compared 12% of the time
More Amazon Elastic Container Service Competitors
Platform9 Managed Kubernetes vs Microsoft Azure Container Service Logo
Platform9 Managed Kubernetes vs Microsoft Azure Container Service
Compared 54% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Container Service Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Amazon Elastic Container Service
October 2025
Amazon Elastic Container Service reportDownload Amazon Elastic Container Service product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Container Service
September 2025
Microsoft Azure Container Service reportDownload Microsoft Azure Container Service product report
 

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service
MS Azure Container Service
 

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind
Esri, BIO CATCH
Buyer's Guide
Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service
September 2025
Free Report: Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,883 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service report.
See our list of best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Containers as a Service (CaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.