Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Microsoft Azure Container Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...
Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Container Management (8th)
Microsoft Azure Container S...
Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Containers as a Service (CaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 19.3%, down from 38.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Container Service is 22.4%, down from 27.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Containers as a Service (CaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amazon Elastic Container Service19.3%
Microsoft Azure Container Service22.4%
Other58.3%
Containers as a Service (CaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
Horizontal scaling is streamlined when deploying modern workloads
Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously. This limitation makes it challenging to define a balanced scale-out automation since a well-written software should balance between processing and memory.
PuneetKaura - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive ecosystem enhances development and cost management capabilities
The CI/CD capabilities are important because we do development. We use both development and production on Microsoft Azure. The CI/CD capabilities help in the development process. For the technical side, I would need to get back to some of my programmers, but we use the complete Microsoft Azure side for all of our development work. The CI/CD helps in the complete process for our team. As we move into the use of Microsoft Azure Container Service, it will make us more flexible and probably reduce our costs down the line. They can probably handle peak traffic and other things better than the older way of doing it. Microsoft Azure Container Service helps to optimize resources and save costs by allowing our product to handle it through this containerization method. When there is not too much traffic, we will be able to bring it down to the minimum, which would give us good cost savings. For our usage of Microsoft Azure Container Service, it is already helping us. For improvements, I don't have any recommendations currently because we have just gotten into it. What is available is good for the work we do. Regarding monitoring tools in AKS, we use them and understand how the environments are working through the tools. We use those for analytics and scaling of the environments. They help us in all our environments, and we can look into them. As required, we can downscale, upscale, and perform other operations because of the available tools.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has good performance."
"Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address and resolve them. The product helps to have a global file system. Also, it helps in data replication from region to region."
"What I really like about Amazon ECS is its simplicity and ease of use. Amazon also has really good security."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"In seven years, we have not faced a single second of downtime."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 Container Service is its flexibility."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service serves the function it's supposed to serve."
"We use the product for website and email database hosting."
"The most valuable features are that it is simple, and the compression of the data."
"Visualization is the most important feature."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has a good level of stability."
"It's a great product if you are in a Microsoft environment."
"Storage is one of the most beneficial features of cloud providers, specifically Azure because when you are working in their cloud environment, you can easily use a storage interface and a storage object that is provided by Microsoft Azure. In a local environment, you have to be involved in establishing and setting up distributed storage file systems for containers which are very difficult and complex. In a cloud environment, you are not concerned about the storage and the dashboard provides you with storage objects with high availability."
"The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs."
"The most valuable feature is that you don't have to maintain the infrastructure."
 

Cons

"The solution needs to be more usable."
"We noticed a problem where our container doesn't always run, and the traffic in our secured license exceeds 100%, leading to increased container costs. We are working to understand and reduce this traffic to control costs."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service should simplify its management. It can be difficult for someone who doesn't have much experience with the tool. Also, the tool needs to add the ability to manage networks."
"EC2 is not self-explanatory enough."
"The solution can still be expensive, even with per-second billing."
"Billing is extremely complex."
"The existing domain-joined capability the solution provides during the initial boot-up of the compute should be streamlined and made a little robust."
"It's a complex tool and should be simplified."
"The customization is an area that needs improvement."
"Standard support could be more helpful and responsive."
"I wasn't very impressed with the documentation."
"In terms of the container strategy, they need to make it more compliant with the Linux OS."
"Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive."
"In the future, I would like to see it generalized and have the ability to better integrate with open-source tools."
"f Microsoft Azure can provide GUI dashboards for end-users and administrators to work separately to manage all the Kubernetes clusters without a need to connect to Azure environments and through CLI it would be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price, I rate Amazon EC2 Container Service’s pricing a four or five out of ten."
"We have to pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon EC2 Container Service."
"If you increase the sizes, you incur costs to your accounts."
"Amazon ECS is expensive."
"The product's pricing is good."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service is priced high."
"Although AWS has successfully captured over 60 percent of the market in the cloud part, the tool is competitively way cheaper for the resources it provides compared to the other solutions."
"I don't know the exact amount we were charged for our use of ECS, but I do know that it can be costly, especially when there is a bug or an error caused by default configurations."
"The costs depend on the resources that you use, and there is a cost-management system to help calculate it."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has costs but in the container environment, there are no costs because it is open source and we are using Docker as the container engine in the master and worker nodes established in the Azure environment."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Containers as a Service (CaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
873,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?
Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...
What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?
The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Container Service?
Better triggers around when we change or when we increase and decrease the environment would be helpful. The cost of Microsoft Azure Container Service could be better. There are many programs that ...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Container Service?
We are a SaaS software company, so we use the solution for putting our product and then going back to customers. Approximately 15 to 20 people are currently working with Microsoft Azure Container S...
 

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service
MS Azure Container Service
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind
Esri, BIO CATCH
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
873,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.