Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Microsoft Azure Container Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...
Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Container Management (6th)
Microsoft Azure Container S...
Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Containers as a Service (CaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 27.3%, down from 38.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Container Service is 24.0%, down from 33.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Containers as a Service (CaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO - PeerSpot reviewer
Horizontal scaling is streamlined when deploying modern workloads
Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously. This limitation makes it challenging to define a balanced scale-out automation since a well-written software should balance between processing and memory.
Charles Daou - PeerSpot reviewer
A nice hybrid solution that offers good visualization and an easy setup
It could be faster. The speed is not good in our country. The migration process takes a long time. We don't have fast internet services, and that slows us down. Standard support could be more helpful and responsive. We'd like to have more stable updates. It updates too often. Instead of updating more often, they should update less often and offer very stable updates.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The cloud services are readily available."
"The production environment is highly available, which nowadays is a requirement for all of the big companies."
"It's quick and easy to have the solution working."
"The solution is simple to access."
"We primarily employ the Linux platform in terms of architecture. It utilizes its database, MySQL. Additionally, for CI/CD processes, we rely on Amazon CodeBuild. Furthermore, we use Amazon S3 storage to store specific static files. Currently, the system is running smoothly, and we don't actively perform any maintenance tasks as everything is automated."
"ECS is a useful platform."
"Overall, it is a user-friendly and efficient tool for managing containers."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon EC2 Container Service is its flexibility."
"Visualization is the most important feature."
"Storage is one of the most beneficial features of cloud providers, specifically Azure because when you are working in their cloud environment, you can easily use a storage interface and a storage object that is provided by Microsoft Azure. In a local environment, you have to be involved in establishing and setting up distributed storage file systems for containers which are very difficult and complex. In a cloud environment, you are not concerned about the storage and the dashboard provides you with storage objects with high availability."
"It's a great product if you are in a Microsoft environment."
"The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has a good level of stability."
"The most valuable features are that it is simple, and the compression of the data."
"The most valuable feature is that you don't have to maintain the infrastructure."
 

Cons

"The solution’s UI should be improved."
"After the load balancer gets attached to Amazon Elastic Container Service clusters, I can't modify, remove, or replace it later."
"The solution can still be expensive, even with per-second billing."
"The solution needs to improve backup and pricing."
"The solution could provide more reliability."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service."
"I think that it would help if the vendor provided more use cases and explanations as to how ECS can be utilized."
"The solution's user experience and management are really bad."
"f Microsoft Azure can provide GUI dashboards for end-users and administrators to work separately to manage all the Kubernetes clusters without a need to connect to Azure environments and through CLI it would be better."
"In terms of the container strategy, they need to make it more compliant with the Linux OS."
"Standard support could be more helpful and responsive."
"I wasn't very impressed with the documentation."
"In the future, I would like to see it generalized and have the ability to better integrate with open-source tools."
"The customization is an area that needs improvement."
"Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing is monthly."
"I don't know the exact amount we were charged for our use of ECS, but I do know that it can be costly, especially when there is a bug or an error caused by default configurations."
"They offer a pay-as-you-go pricing model for the product."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service is priced high."
"There is no need to pay anything towards the licensing costs of Amazon EC2 Container Service."
"We have to pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon EC2 Container Service."
"Although AWS has successfully captured over 60 percent of the market in the cloud part, the tool is competitively way cheaper for the resources it provides compared to the other solutions."
"The product's pricing is good."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has costs but in the container environment, there are no costs because it is open source and we are using Docker as the container engine in the master and worker nodes established in the Azure environment."
"The costs depend on the resources that you use, and there is a cost-management system to help calculate it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Containers as a Service (CaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?
Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...
What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?
The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service
MS Azure Container Service
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind
Esri, BIO CATCH
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Microsoft Azure Container Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.