Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing for Developers comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.1
Katalon Studio is user-friendly and cost-effective, leading to significant savings and efficiency improvements for many teams.
Sentiment score
5.9
OpenText Functional Testing reduces test automation time and costs, increasing ROI by 70-80% compared to manual testing.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
Katalon Studio's customer service is responsive, with better support for enterprise versions, though free users face slower service.
Sentiment score
5.6
OpenText Functional Testing support is generally effective but inconsistent, with improvements noted and suggestions for enhancing responsiveness.
Katalon's support is not very strong unless you opt for the enterprise version.
I encountered a couple of issues during the initial setup, but customer care resolved them quickly.
Within 24 hours, I received support from the customer support team through their forum.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Katalon Studio is praised for scalability, adaptability, and cost-effectiveness, though some seek better script execution for large-scale tests.
Sentiment score
6.6
OpenText Functional Testing offers scalability, supports diverse ecosystems, and enhances integration, though resource consumption is a noted limitation.
It allows me to develop, run, and deploy test cases extensively.
Katalon Studio handles larger projects and more complex test cases very easily.
Katalon Studio has very good scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Katalon Studio is generally stable with occasional bugs and crashes, influenced by updates and application complexity.
Sentiment score
6.6
Experiences with OpenText Testing vary; some face stability issues, but recent improvements enhance reliability compared to competitors.
It needs more stability when test cases are executed.
In my experience, Katalon Studio is stable, but sometimes I encounter lag and crash issues.
I have not encountered any major bugs or crashes.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Katalon Studio struggles with stability, scripting diversity, integration, documentation, and requires better support, pricing, and functionality enhancements.
OpenText Functional Testing requires enhanced integration, stability, performance, and accessibility for broader technology, mobile support, and modernized interfaces.
Parallel execution is available, but not with the free version.
Providing clearer guidance during the trial period for certification and training modules would also help.
There is significant competition, so providing a good offer with extra features could be beneficial.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
 

Setup Cost

Katalon Studio offers free and paid versions, with varied opinions on affordability and competitiveness against similar tools.
Enterprise users find OpenText Functional Testing costly, preferring open-source alternatives, with high setup and licensing fees.
The approximate cost is around $8,000.
Although there are free automation software options available, Katalon Studio offers everything in a single hub for a fee.
The pricing of Katalon Studio is affordable, making it a sensible option for those looking for an affordable range.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
 

Valuable Features

Katalon Studio is renowned for its flexibility, ease of use, and comprehensive support for various testing and automation tasks.
OpenText Functional Testing offers flexibility, integration, and developer-friendly features, enhancing productivity and efficiency with strong stability and automation.
We can schedule our test cases, and the report which we get can be shared with higher-level management.
Katalon Studio has positively impacted my organization because I have noticed that I can save more than 50% of our time automating test cases.
Now, using Katalon Studio, we have a 50% increase in velocity in the test and create automatic tests.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
 

Categories and Ranking

Katalon Studio
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th)
OpenText Functional Testing...
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
11th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Katalon Studio is 8.2%, down from 11.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is 2.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Katalon Studio8.2%
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers2.6%
Other89.2%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ramanagowda Hullur - PeerSpot reviewer
Recording limitations and remote access challenges have affected desktop application testing
Katalon Studio has proven effective in our deliverables, particularly in designing the framework where other tools typically require coding in client libraries such as Python or Java. With Katalon Studio, there is no such complexity, allowing us to organize projects modularly based on folder structures without needing to write separate code. The self-healing feature for web application automation and its built-in CI/CD ecosystem integration eliminates the need for external tools for pipeline setup. Katalon Studio excels in CI/CD integration, providing an inbuilt ecosystem without the need for external setup, and it features a postings structure along with keyword and library availability. Newcomers to the team can easily adapt to the setup or project structure, which contributes to its popularity, along with its low-code or no-code capability that allows for a comprehensive platform supporting web, mobile, API, and desktop automation. The self-healing mechanism for test cases autonomously identifies issues with locators and ensures they continue functioning, which is impressive, along with the robust object repository. Katalon Studio has significantly aided our team, especially when clients expect deliveries for CI/CD integration that requires automation test scripts to run on a daily schedule. The self-healing feature automatically identifies available locators for elements in the DOM, ensuring that test cases remain functional. Katalon Studio has positively impacted our organization by facilitating faster delivery when clients have urgent requirements. We can deliver quickly based on urgency due to the features Katalon Studio provides. This has led to significant reductions in time spent on framework configuration, designing, and training individuals who are unfamiliar with the tool, helping us save both time and costs.
Eitan Gold - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly integration with support for Visual Studio enhances GUI testing capabilities
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio. The support is excellent. It is easy to implement tests with OpenText UFT Developer. We primarily use it for GUI testing and testing web applications with another application. This is the main usage for us. We also integrate it with the N-unit Framework, and they work well together.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise29
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Katalon Studio?
I started with the trial version and found it had many features. I purchased the next level, and the setup cost was reasonable for me. For working professionals, Katalon Studio provides a lot at a ...
What needs improvement with Katalon Studio?
The reporting is very good, but it could be better.
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?
There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?
As of now, we don't have integration in the CI/CD pipeline, but they are supporting that as well. When your machine is in a locked state, you can even execute the Windows application automation. Mi...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola Tesla Black Board TaTa Consultancy Services Sony
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Katalon Studio vs. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.