Ivanti Connect Secure vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Netgate TNSR
Sponsored
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Routers (6th)
Ivanti Connect Secure
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
SSL VPN (3rd)
Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (3rd), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (3rd), ZTNA as a Service (2nd), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Netgate TNSR is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Connect Secure is 5.2%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is 6.6%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
Unique Categories:
Routers
2.4%
SSL VPN
22.6%
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
10.2%
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
23.6%
 

Featured Reviews

Harish (Kumar) - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 3, 2023
Good gateway with helpful traffic shaping and load balancing
There must be a wizard section as per the use case. For example, if we need a simple firewall there must be an auto-install of most required packages. In the same way, if we need a more strict firewall, then different configuration settings. There must be a more easy-to-use GUI. More documentation should be available within the package manager. A visible ON/OFF button must be there and can be easily configured as required. An additional non-us electrical plug must be inside the box. There should be an option to upgrade RAM (i.e. 8GB to 16GB). It can enhance the capacity of the proxy server.
Bharath Kumar Gajula - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 30, 2024
Stability concerns outweigh the scalability benefits due to recurring security risks
We use Ivanti Connect Secure for our users' remote access. It provides virtual private network (VPN) connectivity Ivanti secures access to the corporate network from various devices and locations. All endpoints connect to the Ivanti gateway and then to our internal infrastructure. Gateways are…
RR
Sep 14, 2022
We can apply policies for URLs wherever our employees are working
It's a full firewall, so I can apply firewall policies just as well for web-based apps as I can for offline apps. I definitely think that reduces the risk because I can write any policy I want. Palo Alto has several other advanced threat protection features. In addition to the normal application and threat protection, it has DNS security, IPS, IDS, etc. I run their traffic through all of the impressions. It's not just URL filtering and decryption. Prisma Access offers a full firewall feature, and I take advantage of it. Prisma Access is a Palo Alto firewall in the Cloud that works just like an on-prem firewall. I can manage it from the same platform I use to manage all my other firewalls. I write a policy in one place, and it goes into effect everywhere. It's extremely simple. The security updates are definitely in there as well. I set it up to dynamically download and store the updates as soon as they're available. When Palo comes out with an extremely hot threat, I'm automatically blocking and protecting against it—not just on our internal corporate network, but for all remote VPN users. That is an extremely important feature to have. You pay for those subscriptions, so why would you not take advantage of the people writing protections for you? Why aren't you installing them automatically? I actually worked for a company that did not automatically install things. They thought we might break something. All the places where I had worked in the past automatically installed updates, and we never broke anything. It just worked. Palo Alto is really good about doing it right and protecting the customer.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"Ivanti secures access to the corporate network from various devices and locations."
"The stability of the product is its most valuable feature."
"From an end-user perspective, the setup phase is easy."
"It's quite stable."
"The new UI that they are providing right now is very good."
"What I like the most about Pulse Connect Secure is that it's user-friendly. It's easy to use. You just need to connect, and that's it."
"VPN tunneling is a very valuable feature of Pulse Connect Secure. I also like that it is straightforward to use, and you can see traffic logs on it."
"This is a very secure and stable tool."
"Prisma's most valuable feature would be its ability to identify bad or risky configurations."
"It's much faster and more secure than legacy solutions. It is also quite stable and scalable as well. We are able to see all the traffic in one place."
"The features I find most valuable is WildFire, user integration, and the basic technology features."
"It supports auto-scaling for mobile users. It auto-scales depending on the mobile user traffic. For example, if 1,000 people are working from home today, and tomorrow, the number increases to 2,000, it is not going to be an issue."
"This solution provides a DLP on the cloud and very few people have a scanning device for data at rest."
"The setup is relatively straightforward."
"You have the ability to create your own expressions for your data. Palo Alto understands that DLP is not the same for all consumers. You might have a particular need to fulfill, and they give you the opportunity to create a custom expression to match the specific format that you have. For a confidential file property that you have in your files, you can add a metadata field. It gives you that opportunity to create that."
"It is easy to use, easy to integrate, and is stable. It's scalable as well."
 

Cons

"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"This solution normally works but at times, we have had trouble with connectivity."
"Setup is complex. A few users had some issues with it."
"Pulse Connect Secure could improve by having better integration with NAC solutions, such as Cisco ClearPass integration with Pulse Connect Secure. Additionally, they need better integration with Microsoft Azure AD and Azure Authenticator."
"The most valuable features of Pulse Connect Secure are the user-friendly connection and interconnecting."
"Connection-wise, Pulse Connect Secure could be faster, and this is its area for improvement."
"The product's price is an area where improvements are required."
"The product could use additional dashboards."
"The solution must be more user-friendly."
"If you compare Prisma SaaS against other products, such as Cloud Log, it's a little bit tricky to understand, but it offers different functionality that other products don't have. From a user usability point of view, you need some training for this product, as an admin, you need a couple of demos."
"The frequency of updates could be reduced."
"Its security is good. Everything is good, but the way the dashboard responds can be improved. It takes time to implement a policy. If you change only two or three lines and push the policy to make the change work, it takes 20 to 30 minutes even for a small change. That is something very irritating from the implementation perspective."
"Better integration with the MDM solution would be useful."
"I would like to see support for custom applications."
"While Palo Alto has understood the essence of building capabilities around cloud technology and have come up with a CASB offering, that is a very new product. There are other companies that have better offerings for understanding cloud applications and have more graceful controls. That's something that Palo Alto needs to work on."
"They can add some new characteristics. For example, when an incident triggers, they can automatically send a template for a particular match that is related to the policy. We don't have that right now. It is something to improve. There could be more automation for certain actions. For example, for a particular group, it can send an administrator alert to their manager. It was one of the concerns of our customers."
"There is some particular traffic that the security team wants to filter out and apply their own policies and they cannot."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is not a license required for this solution but the price should be less expensive."
"The price of Pulse Connect Secure is expensive."
"The cost of the product is high, but worth it because of the utility and great product support."
"A license is required for you to use Pulse Connect Secure, but I'm not aware of how much it costs."
"The pricing is quite nominal. We pay on a yearly basis."
"The pricing for Pulse Connect Secure is not low and not high, so it's good. It's a six out of ten for me, price-wise."
"I rate the product price a six to seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
"Pulse Connect Secure is relatively cost-effective."
"They price their products using credit modules."
"Palo Alto is the Cadillac solution, so their products are pretty expensive. That's just the way it is. Their solution surpasses anything else. Cisco AnyConnect, Zscaler, and all of the other products don't compare. Palo Alto is the market leader with the most features. It saves you work, and you don't have to worry about it."
"In terms of pricing, considering that it is a two or three years old solution, they should apply big discounts for the next two or three years. This approach will be better for them to capture the market."
"The solution requires a license and the technical support has extra costs. The licensing model could improve."
"We have to pay additional costs for maintenance and support services."
"The licensing cost is about 18,000 euros."
"This is not an expensive product and everything is included with one license."
"Actually the solution is very expensive. I don't know the particulars since the purchasing team dealt with it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Netgate TNSR?
It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netgate TNSR?
The product is very cost-effective and has no requirement for additional licenses. The setup is not easy. Users need ...
What is your primary use case for Netgate TNSR?
THe solution is used as a primary gateway with two lease lines of 450 Mbps total. Around 200 users are under it. Ther...
What do you like most about Pulse Connect Secure?
From an end-user perspective, the setup phase is easy.
What needs improvement with Pulse Connect Secure?
Some vulnerability issues have led to a high alert in the US and other countries. We've had to initiate a reset of al...
What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?
We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure ac...
What do you like most about Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?
The most valuable features of the solution are in the areas of the secure remote access it provides while also being ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?
Palo Alto products are expensive, but they offer efficient features. We have to pay additional costs for maintenance ...
 

Also Known As

TNSR
Pulse Connect Secure
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Prisma Access, GlobalProtect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect Mobile Security Manager, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, Prisma Access
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UCLA, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, shopify
Axcient, Baloise Group, Cygate, Catholic University of America, Datec Inc, Revlon, Santa Monica Networks, 7-Eleven
Concord Hospital, State of Colorado, Essilor International, RheinLand Versicherungsgruppe, University of Westminster, Universidade Nove de Julho, SPAR Austria, CAME Group, ZipRealty, Greenhill & Co., IKT Agder, Aviva Stadium, Animal Logic, Management & Training Corporation, Brigham Young University Hawaii, School District of Chilliwack
Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Connect Secure vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.