IBM PowerVM vs Proxmox VE comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM PowerVM
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Proxmox VE
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of IBM PowerVM is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Proxmox VE is 19.6%, down from 20.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

AY
Jan 25, 2023
The best option for managing direct licensing
I primarily use PowerVM for Oracle databases and the Oracle WebLogic server PowerVM allows us to pay for a license only for the allocated scope, unlike IBM PowerVM, for which we have to license the whole hardware. PowerVM's most valuable features include swift optimisation and real-time…
MarcGrob - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 27, 2022
Open-source, free to use, and easy to set up
The initial setup is quite straightforward. It isn't that complex. I’d rate it at a one or a two in terms of complexity, on a scale from one to five. The deployment depends a bit on how many nodes or servers you have. You want to get into the cluster. This depends on the month's amount of time, however, we have half a day for a server. For me, it takes a little bit of time. You need a half-day per node, per server. Maybe even less. While maintenance is always necessary, I would say we would invest more or less a day a month just to maintain it and that would entail checking logs and so on. It doesn’t require heavy maintenance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is administration."
"What I like about this solution, is that it is easy to configure."
"It's scalable. Whenever we buy another product other than hardware, it's easily integrated into the virtualization software that we download."
"The case fileserver on the web server is the most valuable feature."
"Technical support is great."
"Active Memory Sharing dynamically reallocates memory of running partitions based on changing workload demands. The memory for the pool is carved out from Physical memory and is made logical memory. The said memory is not available to be assigned to partitions as dedicated memory. A min, max and desired as well as weight is assigned to the memory of each lpar to help hypervisor make a decision in case a condition where priority is to be given to a certain lapr to use the memory form shared pool."
"The valuable feature of the solution is the technical aspects, focusing on elements like processor infinity."
"Managing other operating systems is also straightforward with IBM PowerVM."
"It has a good performance and you can cluster it."
"We had issues with this solution when it comes to resources. We have officially created four to five PMs and it just continues to make more resources even though they are delivered in the main post mode."
"The virtualization is good."
"The most valuable feature of Proxmox VE is its ease of use."
"Proxmox allows us to achieve affordable performance while keeping high levels of data protection and flexibility."
"It's very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is performance."
"It allows us to create an individual VM along with the GPU for machine learning."
 

Cons

"The licensing could be better."
"SRM for site recovery is a feature that should be included."
"To make it a ten, I would like for them to add automation and configuration tools in order to help use the manager."
"This solution is lacking the ability to have servers act as a cluster, such as in VMware. IBM has come out with a feature similar to VMware's vCenter but it is not as mature. They need to add LPM shared-nothing feature, such as in vMotion."
"It is solely command-line based."
"The cost of this solution is high."
"IBM should review the price of this solution in my opinion; it is too high."
"The solution should be advanced to fit with the container constantly."
"The solution should include some features that can help with converting raw files into different formats. It should offer better management around raw files."
"This solution needs a more flexible and efficient backup solution in the dashboard."
"The virtualizer in Proxmox VE could improve."
"If this solution could import directly from OVS format then it would make migration much easier."
"Since I face issues importing Windows OVA inside Proxmox VE, a clickable button should be added to select the OVA format and import it inside Proxmox VE."
"Currently, there are several features inaccessible through the API, necessitating the use of either the WebUI or the command line interface."
"The initial setup has a pretty steep learning curve."
"Backup and recovery could be better. It's a bit problematic. If you're not well-versed with Linux, it tends to be a bit of a challenge when setting up and recovering. It's not really GUI-based, and if you're not a good Linux user, it becomes a bit difficult. In the next release, I would like to have something like Hyper-V's Data Protection Manager, where you could do an offsite backup and keep a copy. I haven't seen that incorporated yet, but I'm sure they will do that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM PowerVM costs more than other products but the customer does not need to pay additional money for the licenses. In VMware, you need to license everything. With IBM PowerVM it is unlimited and all-inclusive in the price you pay."
"We have to purchase the product's licenses."
"The pricing for PowerVM is on the higher. Regarding the license, it can be on a monthly or annual basis, depending on the deal. Customers may choose to pay annually, one-time, or monthly based on their agreement with the sales team. As for additional costs, customers need to pay for support if they opt for it. If not, they only pay for the hardware cost as per the agreement."
"The license cost is bundled with IBM Power Systems as it is limited to RISC-based IBM systems only."
"The price varies from case to case and you have to negotiate it for every project."
"Even if the product is expensive, it works well in the long term. The tool is more or less expensive, and I would presently describe it as an optimally priced product."
"The solution is expensive."
"IBM PowerVM's pricing is cheap."
"Proxmox VE is affordable. It's cheaper than Hyper-V, Huawei Desktop Protocol, and Huawei Desktop Cloud."
"An excellent choice for budget sensitive operations.​"
"The tool is free."
"Since Proxmox is open-source, it's freely available."
"Zero - this is a free solution."
"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of cost."
"The only thing you pay for is support and it is between $2,500 and $3,000 a year. It depends on the support plan you choose. Support is optional."
"Proxmox is free software, but if you prefer the support and a more rested repository then you can pay for it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM PowerVM?
Managing other operating systems is also straightforward with IBM PowerVM.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM PowerVM?
Even if the product is expensive, it works well in the long term. The tool is more or less expensive, and I would presently describe it as an optimally priced product.
What needs improvement with IBM PowerVM?
Automatic LPM is an area that is currently not available in IBM PowerVM, and it is a feature I want to see in the product's future releases. It was very expensive when I tried to use the tool's LPM...
Proxmox vs ESXi/vSphere: What is your experience?
For me the biggest impact is the cost of licensing in the case of VMware despite its overall intuitiveness and ease of handling and management. However, KVM-based Open Source solutions are becoming...
How does Proxmox VE compare with Hyper-V?
One of the best things about Proxmox VE is that it is open-source and very inexpensive. You get all of the same features as with the more well-known products. Proxmox VE is very easy to deploy - it...
Proxmox VE or KVM?
I use Proxmox VE and have been very happy with it. In my opinion, it is a complete and stable solution with excellent tools for managing servers. It has a lot of different features, and I also love...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

PowerVM
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sto, Soitec, SNO, Bundesrechenzentrum GmbH, Al Mansour Holding, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Huhtamaki, ELK Group, IT-Informatik, Arkansas Tech University, Pneuhage
Municipality of Trento, SwitchMIA, inDenova, Valmeita City Council, Alpha IT AS, Grupo Inversor Veracruzano S.A.P.I. de C.V. (GRIVER), Laut und Schoen, IT-Services - Hamburg e.K., KMI Learning, Dynacom Tankers Management Ltd., Serwise AG
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM PowerVM vs. Proxmox VE and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.