Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiEDR
Sponsored
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (12th)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (4th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (4th), Ransomware Protection (2nd)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (19th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiEDR is 5.0%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 4.9%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.2%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Unique Categories:
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7.4%
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
7.5%
Ransomware Protection
15.6%
 

Featured Reviews

PN
May 1, 2023
The rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great
We use Fortinet firewalls for perimeter security at six to seven of our locations It provides extreme perimeter security, especially for VPN and application profiles, and seamless security monitoring through FortiAnalyzer. As a firewall the solution is great, we never had any issues. We saw time…
TS
Jul 6, 2021
Sophisticated user interface, stable, and scalable
We use this solution to protect our computer system against threats, such as exploits and malware The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward. In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by proving hard disk encryption. If it could support this it would be a…
Mar 15, 2023
Reliable with excellent pricing and good reliability
We primarily use the solution as a basic antivirus. It's for protection. We centralize the management of 50 computers.  The solution offers us more security and less chance of getting a virus. So far, we have had no viruses.  So far, the experience has been positive.  The pricing is good. It is…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The stability is very good."
"Provides behavior-based detection which offers many benefits over signature-based detection."
"The interface is easy to use and it is more up to date than our previous solution."
"When the pandemic started, Palo Alto came up with many solutions, which helped with the quick shift from on-premises to the cloud."
"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is its machine-learning capabilities. Additionally, there is full integration with other solutions."
"Its interface and pricing are most valuable. It is better than other vendors in terms of security."
"It integrates well into the environment."
"From a single pane of glass, you can easily manage all of your endpoints."
"Stability is one of the features we like the most."
"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."
"Provides good mobile device protection."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
"The activation of features within ENS and the collection of threats into a single console is a strong point."
"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."
"Trellix integrates well with most SIEM and data classification solutions."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
 

Cons

"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution is not stable."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"The support needs improvement."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"In reporting they should have a customizable dashboard due to the fact that C-level people don't like reporting to the IT department. They prefer to have a real-time dashboard. That kind of dashboard needs to have various customizations."
"In general, the price could be more competitive."
"When it comes to core analysis, and security analysis, Cortex needs to provide more information."
"It is an enterprise-level solution. Its price could be less expensive."
"The solution should offer more dashboards and they should be better customized."
"The solution should force customers to integrate with network traffic to see the full benefits of XDR."
"The encryption is not up to the mark."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR does not detect malicious activity like in other anti-virus solutions like Trend Micro and Windows with Cisco."
"I would like to see more automation."
"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."
"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."
"The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious task."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap, but it's not expensive either."
"It's moderately priced, neither cheap nor expensive."
"The solution is not expensive."
"We got a good deal on licensing, so it is in the competitive range."
"Fortinet FortiEDR is available at a very competitive price compared to the other products in the market."
"While the cost may have been high, we view it as a worthwhile investment due to Fortinet's reliability and long-term performance."
"The pricing is good."
"I know it is tough to get big budget additions up front, but I highly recommend deploying environment wide and adding the forensic service."
"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."
"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."
"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."
"I am using the Community edition."
"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."
"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."
"The price was fine."
"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."
"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
789,135 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiEDR?
We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiEDR?
The pricing of the solution is on the high end compared to its offerings and capabilities.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...
Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...
How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

enSilo, FortiEDR
Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial, Healthcare, Legal, Technology, Enterprise, Manufacturing ... 
CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
789,135 professionals have used our research since 2012.