Checkmk vs Datadog comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics
Sponsored
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
60th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Checkmk
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
19th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (18th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th)
Datadog
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
137
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmk is 11.2%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 9.1%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Monitoring Software
Unique Categories:
Network Monitoring Software
0.4%
Server Monitoring
23.0%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
8.0%
 

Featured Reviews

Shiva_Prasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2024
A cloud solution for warehousing with a troubleshooting feature
The initial setup is straightforward. It's based on user requirements. We also conduct heat mapping using a couple of tools. The only requirement is to understand the technical or configuration aspects from the user's end and then configure it. Mist takes no more than 15 to 20 minutes for a particular deployment. You need to understand the end user's environment and have a concrete plan on whether it's a greenfield installation or an existing one, considering the density and height. Based on that, we need to develop a passive heat map. Then, you need to discuss with the user to understand exactly what needs to be configured and what they require in their environment. Based on that, you can proceed with the installation. Additionally, you can perform post-installation heat mapping to ensure it matches the earlier heat map. I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
MN
Nov 16, 2023
A highly scalable product that helps businesses monitor servers
I think those evaluating Checkmk need to run through its docs and do the simple stuff, and then start looking at the data after turning off all notifications, to begin with, and start slowly with the tool's usage, or else it will overwhelm you. The tool's potential users need to consider its prices since it consists of services and hosts. If you have the kind of nature where you want to gather all the data because you are not sure what you need and don't need initially, the number of services you use can go up quickly. Once you figure out what you really need and what is nonsense, the tool becomes easy, which is probably true with anything you use. I rate the overall tool a nine to nine and a half out of ten.
MP
Dec 6, 2022
Excellent RUM, session replay, and APM
We primarily use the solution for logging and APM, and for real user metrics The solution has helped out organization gain improved visibility. The most useful aspects of the solution include RUM, session replay, and APM. The product needs a better Datadog agent installation. I've used the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."
"I really like the auto-discovery feature."
"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."
"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."
"The biggest thing I liked was the combination of all the things - monitoring, log aggregation, and profiling."
"We rely heavily on the API crawlers that Datadog uses for cloud integrations. These allow us to pick up and leverage the tags teams have already deployed without having also to make them add them at the agent level."
"Datadog dashboards are pretty great."
"The service catalog helped improve our organization by giving a good view of the flow for our microservices applications."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"They have a very good foundation in capturing metrics, logs, and traces. It's a very nice tool for that and it allows you to apply these monitoring tools in almost any technology."
"Datadog's seamless integration with Slack and PagerDuty helped us to receive alerts right to the most common notification methods we use (our mobile devices and Slack)."
"The most valuable aspect is the APM which can monitor the metrics and latencies."
 

Cons

"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."
"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."
"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."
"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."
"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."
"The product needs to have more enterprise approach to configuration."
"I often have issues with the UI in my browser."
"They should continue expanding and integrating with more third-party apps."
"ECS could be improved by including more tutorials for beginners to reduce the barriers to entry."
"It would be great if usage metrics were automatically created and we could create custom metrics, instead we ended up building some of our own stuff to track and alert on our own usage."
"I sometimes log in and see items changed, either in the UI or a feature enabled. To see it for the first time without proper communication can sometimes come as a shock."
"To be very fair, I haven't had enough experience with Datadog to pick out improvements."
"Once Datadog has gained wide adoption, it can often be overwhelming to both know and understand where to go to find answers to questions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."
"The product is affordable."
"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."
"The solution is fairly priced but history and log storage can get costly depending on your needs."
"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."
"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."
"Licensing is based on the retention period of logs and metrics."
"The cost is high and this can be justified if the scale of the environment is big."
"It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost."
"They prefer monthly subscriptions."
"This solution is budget friendly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
6%
Educational Organization
32%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?
We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.
What do you like most about Checkmk?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It i...
What needs improvement with Checkmk?
Checkmk has been constantly improving the tool. I am quite impressed that Checkmk has been keeping up with changes. I...
What is your primary use case for Checkmk?
My company uses Checkmk to monitor our core servers, and we also use it for our network devices for more of a storing...
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems,...
Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several time...
Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was t...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. Datadog and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.