OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
eDiscovery (6th)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (19th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (19th)
 

Featured Reviews

Alejandro Stromer - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 4, 2024
A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup
We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation The solution offers a full tech search and a unique user experience. Also, it is extended within traditional artificial intelligence. The solution could improve…
Joseck Wekesa - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 9, 2023
It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response
You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features. I would like to see Trellix add database activity monitoring. They don't have a plan for this, and there isn't a significant roadmap around it. They have an enterprise service manager, which is sort of like a SIEM, but there is no roadmap. I want to see a clearer roadmap for integrating specific critical solutions like PAM and other things, too.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The solution is very stable."
"Provides protection against threats."
"The performance is good."
"It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."
"The stability has been great."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"The technical support services are good."
 

Cons

"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"There were minor UI bugs."
"​Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process.​"
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."
"They have something called Managed Detection and Response. They get intel from their customers, and that intel is shared with the rest of FireEye's customers. I want to subscribe to their intel, but that is not available to us."
"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"It is a very heavy tool, unfortunately."
"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"EnCase is an affordable solution."
"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
"​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText EnCase eDiscovery?
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What is your primary use case for OpenText EnCase eDiscovery?
We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

EnCase eDiscovery
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.