KerioControl vs Vectra AI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

KerioControl
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (29th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (11th)
Vectra AI
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (2nd), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of KerioControl is 2.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vectra AI is 13.3%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
Unique Categories:
Firewalls
2.3%
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
11.8%
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
22.0%
Network Detection and Response (NDR)
23.9%
 

Featured Reviews

Timur Assembayev - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 2, 2022
Easy to configure, user-friendly, and useful online information
There were some issues with our main firewall and it went down. In a short time, I deployed KerioControl and save our business The most valuable features of KerioControl are ease of configuration, user-friendliness, and comfortable to use. It is an all-in-one solution, it comes with many…
HB
Mar 7, 2023
Efficient, stable and improves productivity
We use Vectra AI mainly for presentations It's important for us that the user interface is easy to understand and that is the biggest benefit we see from Vectra AI. When it comes to Vectra AI helping our software's productivity, it has an effect because it's faster and that is quite important.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I am impressed with the tool's firewall filtering capacity."
"The ease of use in the GUI itself is the most valuable feature. The GUI is really the best part of it. We like the traffic rules so we can control who can get to what. It's easy to determine the flow of the traffic itself so we aren't having to guess through command lines and reading out basically command-driven output. It's just a very easy-to-use interface. The interface is the best part of the product."
"It prevents people from visiting undesirable sites and ensures that they use the internet for their designated jobs."
"The firewall and intrusion detection features are very useful these days because hackers have a lot of tricks that they use to get into a system. With Kerio Control you can see something that's happening. Otherwise, you have to use other tools to see what's happening on the firewalls. Having IPS in it is quite useful for us."
"The initial setup is a breeze."
"The reporting needs to be improved. It is hard to get a domain."
"The firewall and the content filtering options are valuable."
"I have found the most valuable features of Kerio Control to be the IPS and firewall."
"One of the most valuable features is all the correlation that it does using AI and machine learning. An example would be alerting on a host and then alerting on other things, like abnormal behavior, that it has noticed coming from the same host. It's valuable because we're a very lean team."
"One of the key advantages for us is we define a 24/7 service around it. We use far more of Vectra alerts than we do with our SIEM product because we understand that when we get an alert from Vectra we actually need to do something about it."
"The biggest feature for us, because we are heavy Microsoft users, is its integration with Office 365. On top of Vectra AI, we use all of the Microsoft security platforms, such as Defender ATP and Sentinel. Having full integration and a central platform to look at all of the threats that are coming through from the different platforms is a huge benefit for us."
"Vectra produces actionable data using automation. That has helped us. It's less manpower now to look at incidents, which has definitely increased efficiency. Right now, in a lot of cases, our mean time to detection is within zero days. This tells me by the time something happened, and we were able to detect it, it was within the same day."
"The core product provides excellent visibility, but my favorite feature is Vectra Recall."
"The solution's ability to reduce alerts, by rolling up numerous alerts to create a single incident or campaign, helps in that it collapses all the events to a particular host, or a particular detection to a set of hosts. So it doesn't generate too many alerts. By and large, whatever alerts it generates are actionable, and actionable within the day."
"The UI is easy to use and when we send detection to everybody, they easily understand what we are asking at the time."
"We often use the new feature to create PCAP files from the whole data traffic. It makes it much easier to find network problems such as whether the server is responding to a request. It has nothing to do with security, but it helps a lot to find other problems."
 

Cons

"Their support is getting better but still needs improvement."
"They should add wireless features."
"One of the problems we do have causes problems with the VPN. The software slows the throughput down too much. You could have a one-gigabit connection from the internet, and it slows it down to the area of upload and download is extremely slow. There's too much content filtering at that point."
"Support responses need improvement."
"I would like to see them develop a bit more flexibility creating VLANs."
"It has a VPN back to our data center but I don't think it has increased the number of VPN clients extended to those outside our environment"
"I would like to be able to inspect https packets for the purpose of virus scanning."
"The GUI should be changed because it remains the same consistency across versions. However, those who have been using KerioControl for a long time may be accustomed to the current interface. Installing a new version in the same location makes it easy to find, but overall, there are no notable changes between versions."
"The rules for threats are not always precise and Vectra AI should improve this."
"They use a proprietary logging format that is probably 90% similar to Bro Logs. Their biggest area of improvement is finishing out the remaining 10%. That 10% might not be beneficial to their ML engine, but that's fine. The industry standard is Zeek Logs or Bro Logs, or Bro or Zeek, depending on how old you are. While they have 90% of those fields, they're still missing some fields. In very rare instances, some community rules do not have the fields that they need, and we had to modify community rules for our logs. So, their biggest area of improvement would be to just finish their matching of the Zeek standard."
"The solution's marketing is not good."
"The main improvement I can see would be to integrate with more external solutions."
"One area where there's room for improvement is the absence of a comprehensive TCP recording and replay feature."
"I'd like to be able to get granular reports and to be able to output them into formats that are customizable and more useful. The reporting GUI is lacking."
"I think Vectra AI's automation, reporting, and integration could be improved."
"ExtraHop has better features that seem more advantageous when compared to Vectra."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My advice is to use your own hardware, and do not use theirs."
"Its price is fair. There are no additional costs."
"The price is inexpensive."
"I pay approximately $50 for the solution on an annual basis."
"It is a good fit for SMBs because of its maintainability. When you want to keep your costs low, then Kerio Control is a very good solution. It's not an expensive product that is well integrated. It has a complete set of features within it that make it a very strong product."
"The yearly maintenance fee is a bit high for the Kerio Control Boxes. The end of life for the devices is kind of short. It seems like they're making you upgrade within a short period of time. They should at least allow five years, but it seems like they are changing their end of life to be shorter to generate revenue."
"It is priced low enough for entry-level, but it has the power to grow with a company without them having to replace it."
"I am living in Iran and we cannot buy the product from Kerio because of sanctions."
"The pricing and licensing are quite straightforward because they're based on the IP licenses. As a result, they are easy to count."
"The license is based on the concurrent IP addresses that it's investigating. We have 9,800 to 10,000 IP addresses."
"Vectra's pricing is too high. All schools will not be able to afford it. Vectra will only end up targeting higher education and higher value independence purely because of the price. A lot of schools would love to have a product like Vectra AI, but they simply can't because they struggle to even pay the high E5 licensing from Microsoft. When you're up against that, Vectra AI is never going to be within the sector's price range."
"Vectra AI's pricing is cheaper than that of Darktrace."
"We are running at about 90,000 pounds per year. The solution is a licensed cost. The hardware that they gave us was pretty much next to nothing. It is the license that we're paying for."
"We have a desire to increase our use. However, it all comes down to budget. It's a very expensive tool that is very difficult to prove business support for. We would like to have two separate networks. We have our corporate network and PCI network, which is segregated due to payment processing. We don't have it for deployed in the PCI network. It would be good to have it fully deployed there to provide us with additional monitoring and control, but the cost associated with their licensing model makes it prohibitively expensive to deploy."
"Its cost is too much. It's an investment that we can afford. It's a lot, but it's worth it."
"The licensing is on an annual basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Media Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KerioControl?
The solution provides feasibility regarding cyber privacy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioControl?
The pricing is reasonable. We have to pay approximately EUR 175 for the product.
What needs improvement with KerioControl?
The pricing of the product can be improved. The trial duration of the product should also be extended.
What is the biggest difference between Corelight and Vectra AI?
The two platforms take a fundamentally different approach to NDR. Corelight is limited to use cases that require the eventual forwarding of events and parsed data logs to a security team’s SIEM or ...
What do you like most about Vectra AI?
The solution is currently used as a central threat detection and response system.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Vectra Networks, Vectra AI NDR
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Triton Technical, McDonald's
Tribune Media Group, Barry University, Aruba Networks, Good Technology, Riverbed, Santa Clara University, Securities Exchange, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association
Find out what your peers are saying about KerioControl vs. Vectra AI and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.