Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IPsoft vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IPsoft
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (60th), Managed Service Providers (16th)
N-able N-sight Remote Monit...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

IPsoft and N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IPsoft is designed for Cloud Management and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, on the other hand, focuses on Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), holds 4.6% mindshare, down 5.6% since last year.
Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IPsoft0.2%
VMware Aria Automation9.8%
Morpheus7.7%
Other82.3%
Cloud Management
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management4.6%
Kaseya VSA18.2%
NinjaOne13.7%
Other63.5%
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
 

Featured Reviews

Daniel Gombe - PeerSpot reviewer
Remote management and incident handling have improved with customizable alerts and efficient patch management
The best feature in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is the ease of use because I can remote into any machine that's under management without having to drive out to the customer all the time. It helps to reduce workflows because I can create scripts that I can automate, so I don't have to have many people working for me. It helps to reduce incident response times because it's a combination of tools that logs incidents to the PSA, creates tickets, and allows us to manage incidents all in one for an MSP. It does improve service delivery because we can see what's wrong with certain devices before even the customer has a problem, allowing us to remedy it with the necessary tools.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Performing Arts
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?
The pricing is straightforward: it is based on a per-node basis. A node is a device that you would like to monitor to install the agent. The pricing is neither cheap nor expensive; it falls within ...
What is your primary use case for N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?
The typical use case for my clients is that there is no atypical case. I use N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management to have a warning about the state of endpoint and server and also to p...
What needs improvement with N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?
There is room for improvement in the functional aspects of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. For example, it should evaluate the penetration of assets and enhance asset management ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
N-able Remote Monitoring & Management, SolarWinds MSP Remote Monitoring & Management, MSP RMM, SolarWinds RMM, SolarWinds Remote Monitoring and Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Accenture
NetSys Network Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, VMware, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: August 2025.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.