Imanami GroupID vs Oracle Identity Governance comparison

Imanami and Oracle are both solutions in the User Provisioning Software category. Imanami is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 6.7. Imanami holds a 1.0% mindshare in UP, compared to Oracle’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imanami users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Imanami GroupID

Read 3 Imanami GroupID reviews

581 Views
267 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Identity Governance

Read 70 Oracle Identity Governance reviews

1,948 Views
1,013 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Imanami GroupID

Oracle Identity Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Imanami GroupID and Oracle Identity Governance compete in the identity management sector. Imanami GroupID is favored for its affordability and support, while Oracle Identity Governance is recognized for its advanced features that cater to complex IT environments.

Features: Imanami GroupID offers user-friendly directory management, automation capabilities, and enhances productivity. Oracle Identity Governance provides robust access management, compliance tools, and caters to complex IT environments. The main distinction is Oracle's advanced features for extensive management needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imanami GroupID ensures straightforward deployment with strong customer service, ideal for organizations with limited IT resources. Oracle Identity Governance is more complex but benefits large enterprises with dedicated IT departments due to its range of identity management functionalities.

Pricing and ROI: Imanami GroupID presents a cost-effective setup, leading to faster ROI for smaller organizations or those with budget constraints. Oracle Identity Governance requires a more significant initial investment, but its expansive capabilities offer greater long-term ROI for those seeking comprehensive identity solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imanami GroupID

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (24th), Active Directory Management (15th)

Oracle Identity Governance

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (20th), Mobile Identity (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the User Provisioning Software category, the mindshare of Imanami GroupID is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Identity Governance is 4.6%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Provisioning Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Identity Governance	4.6%
Imanami GroupID	1.0%
Other	94.4%

User Provisioning Software

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Cauthorn

Identity and Access Management Manager at NeuGen

Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement

I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution lists as well. It can do that, but there were a few things that were limiting. It was difficult to get it set up, particularly with Azure in the cloud. I'd like that to be a little bit smoother. I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools. We've got a ton of groups, and it does take quite a while to do nightly processing. This is something that definitely needs improvement.

Read full review

Amimesh Anand

Senior Architect at Cognizant

Offers reliability through features associated with RBAC

Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product because sometimes you cannot directly upgrade from one version to another version. You have to go to the lower version and then upgrade to the higher version, which is the biggest drawback of Oracle products. There are no additional features in the tool currently, and it has been the same for the last ten years. I want to see AI features in the tool so it becomes easy for implementers. There should be a change in the installation and deployment part, which is very heavy, due to which the team requires a lot of time, like two to three weeks. It should be easy to implement the tool in two or three days.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found the overall features to be useful."

"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial."

"Identifying connector framework for unifying provisioning capabilities from OIM."

"The most important features that have impacted our environment recently are the Single Sign-On solution, role based provisioning, and the automated provisioning of accounts to target systems."

"This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding."

"The solution's capabilities in provisioning, de-provisioning, terminations, and transfers are excellent."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible automation functionality which has optimized our user access privilege management. This has allowed us to create and delete user accounts more accurately and efficiently. This feature has enabled us to save time and resources needed to perform mundane manual tasks."

"The most important feature is the connectors. Without the connectors, it can do nothing."

"The best features in Oracle Identity Governance product include comprehensive reporting, as we can track exactly what person did what because of the auditing policies that can be enforced in it, and at what time what was done."

More Oracle Identity Governance pros

Cons

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."

"The development and the administration side could be a lot more intuitive and easier to use than it currently is, in terms of functionality and what it tries to achieve as a Single Sign-On entity for an enterprise environment."

"This product currently uses a complex and old implementation. They need a single, user-friendly console for easy configuration. The Active Directory Services (ADS) integration needs improvement. They should offer non-Java coding options and simplify mapping."

"It's a complex solution, so it will take time in terms of deployment."

"Our issues with the solution have to do with the integration with different applications. It's not easy to connect ICAO to this kind of product. It would be better to work on the extensions of the adapters for this kind of identity management solution in order to not put in the code in the product."

"It would be great if the Oracle Fusion Middleware team worked on making it compatible with other application servers, as it exists in OIM9.x."

"The cost of this product needs to be reduced."

"Identity Governance is a difficult tool to work with. You have to input many models to understand what is happening with the logins. The user interface is not so good. And a lot of the features we use aren't available out of the box."

"It would be beneficial if there were more connectors available from Oracle, as there is a long list of connectors, and they can be developed over time."

More Oracle Identity Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"Oracle Identity Governance is an expensive solution."

"Price-wise, the tool is a little bit costly."

"The licensing is expensive."

"Oracle licenses are expensive. I suggest making pricing and licensing decisions that align with architectural requirements and the project's budget."

"I do not know specific pricing but the product is expensive when compared to other OIM products."

"The price of the implementation of Oracle Identity Governance is more of a concern than the cost of the solution. The effort that you have to do to put the solution in place is higher than the license cost."

"The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive."

"Oracle Identity Governance is expensive."

More Oracle Identity Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

27%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Imanami GroupID?

Imanami GroupID's UI is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Imanami GroupID?

The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Imanami GroupID?

The notifications, approvals and emails are very smooth in Imanami GroupID. I rate it an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Identity Governance?

Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access restrictions based on role-based policies were beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Governance?

In terms of pricing and setup cost for Oracle Identity Governance, it can be affordable (depends on the discounts you get and your needs). Since it is enterprise product, Its implementation can bec...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Governance?

Direct comparison of OIG/OIM/OAM would require several factors to count in. Other than being excellent product, it would be more convenient to have more 3rd party integrations/connectors available ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 28% of the time

Fischer Identity Governance vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 26% of the time

e-trust Horacius vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 26% of the time

One Identity Active Roles vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 19% of the time

More Imanami GroupID Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 26% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 6% of the time

One Identity Active Roles vs Oracle Identity Governance

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Identity Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

September 2025

Download Imanami GroupID product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Identity Governance

August 2025

Download Oracle Identity Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite

Overview

Groups don’t live forever. Project teams disband, departments re-organize, and employees change status. GroupID from Imanami leverages the pervasiveness of Microsoft® Active Directory and empowers IT professionals with the tools needed to effectively provision and manage users. Users can be quickly entered into the correct distribution and security groups, and are easily managed across multiple systems.

There Are Three Main Benefits To A Complete Group Management Solution:

Reduce the load on the IT staff and helpdesk
Improve employee productivity by putting users in the correct distribution groups immediately
Improve security by having each security group’s membership accurate immediately

Groups Are Never Out Of Date.

Users are empowered to solve common problems independently. Security and access aren’t compromised. IT is empowered with the right tools to help employees. Staff productivity goes up. What more could you want?

Imanami

Oracle Identity Governance (OIG) is a very versatile and robust enterprise identity management solution that offers functional and business performance competence by supplying centralized administration and total automation of identity and client provisioning events throughout the organization and user applications. Oracle Identity Governance monitors the complete identity and role process to satisfy rapidly changing business and complex compliance regulations and quickly delivers critical reporting and compliance capabilities.

Oracle Identity Governance is designed to easily identify which users have approved access to specific applications and other resources. It does this by using processes such as segregation of duties (SOD), role-based access control (RBAC), certifications, and access requests.

Oracle Identity Governance Features

Self-service wizard: Oracle Identity Governance has worked to make the onboarding of applications significantly easier. It no longer takes numerous steps and technical expertise. The self-service wizard makes the process simple and user-friendly.
Self-service APIs: This gives Oracle Identity Governance users an improved user experience (UX). The REST APIs for user self-service can be used for both web and mobile users. Oracle Identity Governance users are easily able to view user accounts and roles, in addition to being able to complete self-service tasks such as forgotten passwords, registration, and more.
Certification: Oracle Identity Governance offers many certification options, such as a custom access reviewer, group reviewing support, and designate certifications by completed percentage. OIG can also focus on specific role access and anomalies for access beyond a user-defined role (UDF).
Integration connectors: Oracle Identity Governance has many integration connector options for both cloud and on-premises deployments. Popular categories include Oracle Identity Cloud Service (IDCS) and traditional and hybrid systems such as Fusion Applications (FA). OIG also integrates well with connectors to Database Application Tables (DBAT), scripting tools, and web services. OIG offers several integration connectors with many of today’s top SaaS applications, such as Dropbox, Google Apps, Office 365, ServiceNow, and WebEx.

Reviews from Real Users

“The one thing that stands out was the automatic sign-out when an employee goes on vacation. Identity Governance can monitor when an employee goes on vacation and returns. We use this feature to automatically disable all the employee's accounts when they go on vacation, and they're automatically enabled when they come back. We can also automatically delete the employee's accounts when they're dismissed. Oracle has a model that gives you precise reports. It's called Crystal, and it's similar to JasperReports, so we can derive reports from this database. “ - Fabio L., Partner at a tech services company.

“We are using Oracle Identity Manager for the management of the identity cycle. We have a human resources system as a source, and we have some custom-made applications as a destination of the changes in the identities. - A PeerSpot user who is a Project Manager at a government “

Oracle

Sample Customers

Grant Thornton LLP

Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance

September 2025

Free Report: Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imanami GroupID vs. Oracle Identity Governance report.

See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors.

We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.