HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared HP and Kaspersky solutions aren't in the same category. HP is ranked #17 in EPP , and holds a 3.1% mindshare in the category. Kaspersky is ranked #22 in NTA , and holds a 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform are leading cybersecurity solutions, each with distinct strengths. HP Wolf shines due to its user-friendly nature and comprehensive support, while Kaspersky is noted for superior threat detection.

Features: HP Wolf Security offers seamless integration with existing IT environments, proactive malware protection, and a secure browser for isolating high-risk web activities. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform emphasizes in-depth threat analysis, real-time monitoring tools, and advanced analytics for targeted attack prevention.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf could enhance its threat detection capabilities, refine its reporting features for better insights, and expand cloud security functionalities. Kaspersky can simplify its setup process, improve interface intuitiveness, and offer more flexible pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security enables straightforward deployment, suited for rapid protection needs, with efficient customer service noted for speed and responsiveness. Kaspersky, though requiring technical expertise for setup, provides specialized deployment support, addressing complex installation issues.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security presents cost-effective pricing, ensuring a quick return on investment due to its efficient setup and support. Kaspersky demands a higher initial investment but justifies it through cutting-edge features, targeting organizations seeking long-term threat detection and analysis benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,753 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HP Wolf Security	3.1%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	6.5%
CrowdStrike Falcon	5.7%
Other	84.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack	1.5%
Darktrace	15.1%
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	8.4%
Other	75.0%

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

FarkhundAbbas

Security Engineer at adcb

The tool provides excellent sandboxing and email security features, but the backup and recovery features are not good

If my primary solution is down, no backup solution is available to restore it. It is one of the biggest weaknesses of the platform. If I need to update the solution, there is no option to pick the events and the logs from it and deploy it in another solution. The backup and recovery features of the product are not good. I need backup. If the tool is down for some time, I cannot get the logs at that particular time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From the Palo Alto side, whatever they buy, they integrate that really well into their integration suite, and that makes a massive difference."

"Cortex XDR is a simple platform that's easy for administrators and users. You have a lot of flexibility to change or customize the features."

"The initial setup isn't too bad."

"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the low consumption of system resources. The solution uses a lot of AI and machine learning."

"They did what they said, and this solution could apply to any scenario."

"Being a cloud solution it is very flexible in serving internal and external connections and a broad range of devices."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"Bromium allows us to safely view images and quickly and safely surf our network so that we can take proper care of our patients efficiently, effectively, and expeditiously."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"It has reduced the number of virus and malware incidents and calls we have received compared to prior to deploying this product, and our overall security posture has improved."

More HP Wolf Security pros

"The product's deployment phase is easy."

"The email security feature is really good."

"The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y"

"The Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform provides visibility into telemetry data, enabling comprehensive monitoring of environmental activities."

"The most valuable use is detailing metadata collection from the endpoint and network."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is stable and runs all the time."

"I feel the anti-ransomware update is one of the tool's valuable features."

Cons

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"The setup is quite easy. We had appropriate support from the manager. One thing that was missing was the integration part."

"Basically, they don't provide customer support tools just to investigate the logs."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"The encryption is not up to the mark."

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

"It's not an ideal choice for smaller businesses, as you need a minimum of 200 endpoints to even use the solution at all."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"The backup and recovery features of the product are not good."

"In some of the places I have come across, even though they use Kaspersky, the ransomware enters their system."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is not a good product. We had problems with endpoints and the solution did not detect it. We didn't get any alerts about the attack."

"The blind spot or gap in the platform is network analysis functionality."

"I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products."

"The solution lacks cloud integrations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"This is an expensive solution."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is cheap."

"Kaspersky is one of the cheaper solutions."

"The solution has competitive pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

16%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 4% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

TrendAI Vision One vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 7% of the time

SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 5% of the time

MaxPatrol EDR vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 5% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

September 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

August 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

August 2026

Download Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Bromium vSentry

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HP Wolf Security provides robust protection against malware and security threats by isolating untrusted content and offering a secure browsing experience. It combines high-performance protection with user-friendly operations, aiming to keep devices secure without hindering productivity.

HP Wolf Security focuses on preventing malware infections through content isolation. Its virtualized browser ensures high-risk activities do not lead to incidents by removing malware upon session closure. Features like LAVA alerts offer in-depth analysis, making management reporting more efficient. While adjustments are required for better Windows adaptation and broader browser support, it continues to offer significant security advantages. Compatibility challenges and resource usage during browsing and document tasks highlight areas for improvement.

What key features define HP Wolf Security?

Isolation Feature: Prevents malware infection by isolating untrusted content.
Secure Browser: Manages high-risk activities safely and removes threats post-session.
LAVA Alerts: Provides detailed analysis for enhanced management reporting.
Micro VM Protection: Office and PDF files are safely handled with reduced vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Seamless Usability: Combines security with user-friendly operations.
Enhanced Protection: Reduces vulnerabilities across different file types.
Cost-effective Solution: Offers significant security features at a competitive price.
Management Efficiency: Improved reporting and analysis for better decision-making.

In the healthcare sector, HP Wolf Security assists in processing large imaging files efficiently, important for radiology departments. It offers an additional safety layer for laptops in dynamic environments and is pre-installed on many devices, functioning comparably to Norton 360 for comprehensive endpoint protection.

Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform offers comprehensive capabilities for EDR and targeted attack prevention, focusing on detecting advanced threats and protecting endpoints, email, and networks with features like sandbox analysis.

This platform integrates user-friendly interfaces for creating detection rules and performing IOC sweeps to identify potential compromises. It includes metadata collection from endpoints and networks, anti-ransomware updates, and email security via sandbox analysis. Organizations employ it for monitoring system and network activities, enhancing threat detection across IT infrastructures without relying on signatures. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in network analysis and integration within its ecosystem and with third-party solutions. Pricing adjustments could benefit smaller companies, and enhancements in endpoint detection and package deal options could optimize its effectiveness.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?

Metadata Collection: Gathers valuable details from endpoints and networks
Anti-Ransomware Update: Regular updates enhance protection against ransomware attacks
Email Security: Sandbox analysis detects malicious code effectively
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies rule creation and IOC sweeps
Threat Intelligence: Assists in developing detection rules based on IOCs

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Advanced Threat Detection: Identifies threats without relying on signatures
Comprehensive Email Protection: Detects and mitigates malicious content
Ease of Deployment: Offers easy setup in on-premise models
Enhanced Monitoring: Provides rigorous monitoring of system and network activities

In industries like finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is implemented to protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with regulatory standards. Its combination of email, web, and endpoint protection supports organizations by preventing data breaches and ensuring robust security across IT systems.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Valspar

Republic of Serbia, Goods.ru, Tael, Insolar

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.