Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs Palo Alto Networks K2-Series comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate
Sponsored
Ranking in Firewalls
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
309
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (2nd), WAN Edge (1st)
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
Ranking in Firewalls
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks K2-Series
Ranking in Firewalls
28th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Q&A Highlights

DL
Mar 23, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

AM
Feb 22, 2022
Straightforward implementation, priced well, and effective proxy mode
The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate are the ability to work in proxy mode, which other solutions, such as Palo Alto cannot. There are some features that are better that come at no extra license or subscriptions cost, such as basic SD-WAN. The DLT is useful, other solutions have the same feature too, such as Palo Alto. Fortinet FortiGate can be deployed in the cloud, they have a full portfolio for security. You are able to integrate other Fortinet solutions together to take full advantage of their security portfolio. The Fortinet FortiGate documentation library and full resources can be reached easily. You can search and find a solution to a problem you might have. Additionally, the overall solution is highly user-friendly.
GB
Nov 29, 2021
Intuitive solution with comprehensive features and an extensive threat database
My primary use case of this solution is for advanced security in the cloud, as well as SD-WAN and branch connectivity. We use version 6.4 and are just now moving to 7.0.  FortiGate-VM has many valuable features: it's easy to use, it's intuitive, it's got very good traffic inspection features, it's…
JD
May 9, 2024
Offers good support and GUI makes it easy and faster to make the changes we need
I support the Palo Alto firewall that is already installed. We have the Palo Alto in the data center, and we just have to put access within most various VLANs and permit some type of service or access It is graphical. With the GUI, it's faster to make the changes we need. This is the main…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is quite easy to handle."
"FortiGate firewalls are easy to manage through a user-friendly web interface. They also have advanced features like DDoS and DLP. However, I wouldn't recommend enabling all of these features on one device because it can cause performance issues."
"The reporting and monitoring are very good."
"The most valuable features of the solution are SD-WAN, filtering testing applications, web filtering, and the new VPN."
"You can purchase switches and you don't need to do anything with them. You just put in the firewall and the switches get all the policies and rules that you already have in the firewall. With Fortinet, you just connect the FortiSwitch to the Fortinet and that's it."
"A strong point of FortiGate is the graphical interface is complete and easy to use."
"The most valuable features are SD-WAN, application control, IPS control, and FortiSandbox."
"This solution made it very easy to manage our bandwidth."
"The customer care center of Fortinet is good. For all the requests that we have done, they work as fast as possible, so this is a good point for Fortinet.​"
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"In terms of specific features, I like FortiGate's load balancing, interface, and priority on the network."
"Fortinet-VM is more scalable than the hardware version. If you're using an appliance, there are limitations in terms of hardware specs. So if you want a more scalable firewall, you can get a VM and install it on a high-end server."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to deploy it on live physical hardware. Specifically, when providing firewall services for clients, we can leverage such hardware appliances to support multiple customers on the same hardware."
"The ease of access and user-friendly setup is a valuable feature. Fortinet proves to be particularly straightforward to configure, offering simplicity without complexity. Moreover, visibility is easily attainable due to certain factors. Price, implementation, and budget considerations play a role. When it comes to Cisco implementation, the process tends to be more intricate, which many customers find unfavourable for their business needs."
"It handles our current load with ease, and I think it can handle a bit more. It definitely can handle a lot more capacity than we currently use."
"It offers the same robust features and functionality in virtual, on-premise, and traditional data center environments."
"I have found the threat profile feature valuable."
"I like the tool's WildFire feature."
"Palo Alto firewalls are scalable enough. We have about 110 employees in our company, and we are about to expand to 130."
"The customer service and support are really good."
"The scalability of the product is quite high."
"This is a very reliable firewall and we have never had problems with it."
"Palo Alto has a unique solution for DNS security, which is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks K2-Series is the configuration, it is very clear."
 

Cons

"There is a lot of improvement needed with SSL-VPN."
"There are problems with the custom reporting of the unique traffic. The data is there, but it is too difficult for us to extract."
"I would like to see improvements with the antivirus and IPS as they are not working properly all the time."
"The logging details need to be improved."
"The scalability could be better."
"Usually, we sell the bundle with the UTM or threat management piece with IPS, IDS. Other providers, such as Palo Alto, are ahead in terms of safe functionality. So, for me, delivering truly safe service is probably something that still needs to be improved."
"The support from Fortinet FortiGate could improve. They are not easily accessible when we need them. They could improve their response time."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The pricing is expensive."
"The interface needs to be updated and simplified."
"The price is problematic."
"Not a ten because I think that Cisco is better."
"It needs an Application Inspection."
"The log settings and filters could use some improvement."
"Technical support could be improved."
"Fortinet could improve the availability and delivery of its products. It takes four to six weeks for every purchase to arrive."
"Palo Alto releases a lot of bug fixes for their firewalls, which means it's necessary to do frequent upgrades. They should work on decreasing their bugs so that upgrades aren't needed so often."
"When it comes to renewing the solution, they tend to try to jack up the pricing."
"I'd like to see more data protection on the system."
"In the past, we've had trouble with Palo Alto's application filtering not getting it right. I would not be recommending layer 7 application filtering yet."
"It would be nice if it could easily be integrated with Elasticsearch or Nagios."
"The URL Filtering module needs to have more categories added to it."
"The password function of the solution could be improved. Additionally, some of the processes take too long to complete."
"The product should get frequent updates allowing us to add new signatures."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is lower than Cisco."
"We purchased a five-year bundle package, which worked out cheaper than competing solutions."
"It is not a very costly product if you compare it with other products. The return on investment is also good. If you compare the return of investment and money that you are spending on this product with Palo Alto, Cisco, Check Point, and other solutions, the investment is very less. We are happy with this solution. The optional licenses are there, and you can choose which one you want and which one to avoid."
"The pricing of the solution is very competitive."
"Fortinet FortiGate's price can be reduced."
"Fortinet FortiGate is expensive."
"The value is the capability of having multiple services with one unique license, not having the limitation per user licensing schema, like other vendors."
"Licensing is usually on a three-year period."
"The cost of this product is too high."
"Of all the firewalls that we compared, FortiGate is the cheapest and most affordable, so we are satisfied with the pricing."
"Installation does not require another license making it an inexpensive solution."
"It would be nice to have the ability to extend FortiGuard subscriptions at a reasonable yearly cost versus a bulk three year pricing.​"
"​The basic pricing in Austria is OK, but asking for special offers, e.g., NPOs, NGOs, trade up, and/or trade in, is always useful.​"
"There is a benefit in terms of the cost of using this solution because the price is very good."
"​It is on par with what you receive. It can be expensive upfront."
"There is a need to make payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution."
"When comparing Palo Alto Networks K2-Series with other solutions it is on the higher end of the price scale."
"Palo Alto firewalls are very expensive."
"It is an expensive solution."
"It would be nice if they lowered their prices for small businesses."
"The pricing is expensive."
"The price of the solution is expensive."
"This product is designed for large companies. The price would not be suitable for a small or medium size company."
"Palo Alto Networks K2-Series is an expensive solution, the price could be reduced. They are more expensive than some of their competitors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

DL
Mar 23, 2021
Mar 23, 2021
In the best tradition of these questions, Feature-wise both are quite similar, but each has things it's better at, it kind of depends what you value most. PA is good at app control, web filtering and such like, they have always been top of the pile there. The GUI is very good, and their product is very user-focused. Fortinet is good for scalability and predictable high throughput (ASICs in the...
2 out of 4 answers
AT
Mar 20, 2021
Hi, Both FT and PA have compelling features for large Enterprises. I would like to add a few good points about Fortinetwhich might be helpful ( from my 13 years of engagement with them as Distributor and Partner) Fortinet:  Have higher throughput; which comes with competitive rates Wide range of models to select to meet your requirement, without spending heavliy Outstanding customer support and very active customer care team Easly available skilled resources from the channel for deployment and post-implementation support  Regards Abhilash
LD
Mar 22, 2021
Hi PaloAlto is better when working on app control feature and special virtual wire links. Execpt that specific point, Fortinet is above. Best Regards, Damien
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
22%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
27%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Non Profit
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?
When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage a...
What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?
From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know...
What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?
As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite ...
Features comparison between Palo Alto and Fortinet firewalls
In the best tradition of these questions, Feature-wise both are quite similar, but each has things it's better at, it...
Which would you recommend - FortiGate VM or Azure Firewall?
Both of these solutions are excellent options that provide flexible scalability and solid security. Fortinet Fortigat...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiGate-VM?
An enhanced security solution for any kind of alert that we have configured.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks K2-Series?
The pricing is more expensive, but they have a vast range of products. I just saw some products that are more afforda...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks K2-Series?
The prices are not affordable for small companies.
 

Also Known As

FortiGate 60b, FortiGate 60c, FortiGate 80c, FortiGate 50b, FortiGate 200b, FortiGate 110c, FortiGate
FortiGate Virtual Appliance, FortiGate-VM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Amazon Web Services 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Cisco 5. Dell 6. HP 7. Oracle 8. Verizon 9. AT&T 10. T-Mobile 11. Sprint 12. Vodafone 13. Orange 14. BT Group 15. Telstra 16. Deutsche Telekom 17. Comcast 18. Time Warner Cable 19. CenturyLink 20. NTT Communications 21. Tata Communications 22. SoftBank 23. China Mobile 24. Singtel 25. Telus 26. Rogers Communications 27. Bell Canada 28. Telkom Indonesia 29. Telkom South Africa 30. Telmex 31. Telia Company 32. Telkom Kenya
Security7 Networks, COOPENAE
State of North Dakota, SEGA, Alameda County Office of Education, Temple University, VERGE, CAME
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Palo Alto Networks K2-Series and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.