BlazeMeter vs froglogic Squish comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (4th), Functional Testing Tools (8th), Load Testing Tools (4th)
froglogic Squish
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
11th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of froglogic Squish is 2.3%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
Unique Categories:
Performance Testing Tools
17.7%
Functional Testing Tools
0.6%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Lalit Parkale - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 18, 2022
Saves us $50,000 annually on infrastructure costs, increases delivery velocity, and improves productivity
It's a great platform because it's a SaaS solution, but it also builds on-premises hosting solutions, so we have implemented a hybrid approach. BlazeMeter sets us up for our traditional hosting platforms and application stack as well as the modern cloud-based or SaaS-based application technologies. The solution is completely built on an open-source stack. Before performance testing, we used JMeter. There's flexibility in choosing Gatling, Locust, Taurus, or other open-source technologies. We're able to attract good talent in the market. They like open-source because it's lightweight, accessible, and quick. That's been a strong point. We integrated user access management, so it's easy for consumers to actually use it. It has great reporting features and integrations. It can connect to AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and Splunk. Another great feature is that it meets the various maturity levels in our organization. We still have manual-based testing, and there are some teams that are very engineering and code focused. BlazeMeter helps meet all those maturity levels. For example, a manual tester who wants to get into automation can use the scriptless feature. Even business people can use the record and playback function and record the business process. That is captured into JMeter and Selenium scripts, and they can continue executing that. The solution enables the creation of test data that can be used both for the performance and functional testing of any application. Currently, we aren't using the test data feature in BlazeMeter. It took us a year to realize the benefits because we had to do the design work and the network enablement piece for teams to start using it at that scale. BlazeMeter helps bridge Agile and CoE teams. We define CoE as the center of enablement, not a center of excellence. We don't have central teams. We use the hub and spoke model. The hub is basically the central enablement team. We provide BlazeMeter as a service in the bank, and we manage, maintain, and govern it, but individual teams have federated autonomy. The solution helps us implement shift-left testing. We're still in that stage, and we have various maturity levels in our organization. We have between 6,000 and 7,000 engineers. Out of that, around 2,000 are manual testers. The maturity level across those many thousands of engineers is varied. Some teams have definitely embedded shift left, and BlazeMeter is good at that. They can use YAML files and start shifting left. That means the developers are able to have YAML definitions in their code to do smaller performance load tests. We use the solution's scriptless testing functionality. We have many testers who use scriptless testing now. The record and playback function is also one of the key aspects. The manual testers are definitely getting more confident that they can start moving toward automation. People are finding that the existing test automation helps to build their test cases quicker. They struggled with JMeter as a tool. They had to learn various nuances. With scriptless testing, recording, and playback, they don't have to worry about that. BlazeMeter definitely decreased our test cycle times. During each cycle, we're saving between one to two hours. We enabled integration between BlazeMeter and AppDynamics, so people don't have to log into multiple tools to do their analysis. BlazeMeter provides a single pane of glass to do the analysis. It essentially saves days in the sprint because they would execute a test, then go into AppDynamics, the SCOM, or the IIS logs. To fetch the IIS logs, they would have to wait for the operations team to give them access.
AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 21, 2023
Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable
There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was simple."
"I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick."
"The most valuable aspect of BlazeMeter is its user-friendly nature, ability to conduct distributed load testing and comprehensive analysis and reporting features. It particularly excels in providing a clear and organized view of load test results."
"BlazeMeter can be used for both API and performance testing, it is a multi-facility tool."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to run high loads and generate reports."
"Using cloud-based load generators is highly valuable to us, as we can test from outside our network and increase load generation without having to upscale our hardware as much. The cloud load generator is there when we need it and is the feature we leverage the most."
"BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process."
"They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."
"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."
"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."
"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."
"The initial setup process is straightforward."
 

Cons

"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."
"Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run."
"Integration with APM tools like Dynatrace or AppDynamics needs to be improved."
"I don't think I can generate a JMX file unless I run JMeter, which is one of my concerns when it comes to BlazeMeter."
"Potential areas for improvement could include pricing, configuration, setup, and addressing certain limitations."
"Integration is one of the things lacking in BlazeMeter compared to some newer options."
"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."
"The tool fails to offer better parameterization to allow it to run the same script across different environments, making it a feature that needs a little improvement."
"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."
"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."
"The price could be better."
"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."
"The solution is free and open source."
"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."
"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."
"It is an averagely priced product."
"When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good."
"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."
"My company has opted for a pay-as-you-go model, so we don't make use of the free version of the product."
"The platform is highly-priced."
"It is expensive."
"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
18%
Retailer
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...
What do you like most about BlazeMeter?
It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?
The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs. However, Neustar has more reasonable pricing. Most people don't prefer Neustar, but it is a good solution.
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace.
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
My primary use case for this solution is for automatic software testing. Specifically, I use it to test software's user interfaces using a test tool that automates these tests.
 

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. froglogic Squish and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.