Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway comparison

Avi Networks Software Load ...

Read 8 Avi Networks Software Load Balancer reviews

2,933 Views
1,864 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Application...

Read 43 Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

6,752 Views
5,802 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Avi Networks Software Load ...

Microsoft Azure Application...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avi Networks Software Load Balancer and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report (Updated: May 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

May 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,817 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Avi Networks Software Load ...

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure Application...

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

4th

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is 3.2%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is 7.4%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Unique Categories:

No other categories found

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

8.8%

Featured Reviews

Richard Polyak

Sr. Architect at NBC Universal

Jun 24, 2022

Easy to set up and has good integration into the host environment but needs better third party integration

I'm not sure which version number we are on. It's one of the latest, I assume. We don't run the latest. We usually are either one or two versions behind. It is something we are exploring. We do have use cases and it will compete against our existing product line. That would have to go in the second half of this year. Right now, it's more of a comparison of how we use it right now. We don't use it really in production. We are going to definitely explore it and do our comparison and more in-depth analysis of the product and compare it against our existing product line. I'd advise potential users to do a very in-depth analysis of the products in comparison. And don't just look at the cover of it - really look into the detailed backend support infrastructure and if it can be implemented the way you need it to be. I'd rate the solution five out of ten. It's not a fully mature product.

Read full review

Sooryanarayan Hegde

Technical Architect at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Feb 20, 2024

Easy management and configuration, affordable, and has good features

We use all the features. It is very useful. Using WAF, we can control the WAF rules based on our application requirements. We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled. The role of the tool is limited to HTTP traffic. It does exactly what it must do. It's a regional service. We know how to use it for DR scenarios. WAF has been the most valuable in protecting applications. We use at least three instances in the back end to give the best performance for our applications. The management and configuration of the solution is quite easy. All certificate renewals are automatically taken care of by Key Vault.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has simplified our network infrastructure management."

"Its visibility and login mechanism are the best parts. In addition to the great visibility it has a great dashboard and an easy to configure graphic user interface, a beautiful GUI."

"What's most valuable in Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is its deployment capability, the ability to deploy in a dispersed service, with the service engines that can disperse and have a single control plane that can control the load balancing services across any available platform, wherever needed. The analytics of Avi Networks Software Load Balancer and flexibility of deployment are its most valuable features and the reasons why many people buy it."

"The most valuable feature of the solution for my organization is its UI since it allows us to see the clusters while providing a very specific and good overall understanding."

"The WAF - the web application firewall itself - is great."

"The friendly user interface is valuable."

"The interface and software features are the most valuable aspects of this solution."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is traffic management."

"The most valuable feature is WAF."

"The security feature in all the layers of the application is the most valuable."

"The pricing is quite good."

"WAF feature replicates the firewall."

"We find it valuable because it is compatible with our existing Azure solution."

"The solution has built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the web application firewall (WAF)."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pros

Cons

"One struggle with Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is its integration with other VMware products. Integration could be improved in the solution so that you have a more unified control plane with it and other data center security and networking products that VMware sells. There has been a bit of a lag on the roadmap of new features that have come out there recently, but better interoperability with the hyperscale environments such as the AWS, Azure, GCPs of the world, and simpler deployment and interoperability with those existing tools, are areas that are receiving attention and could use additional attention today. These are the areas for improvement in Avi Networks Software Load Balancer."

"It doesn't match the development structure or user community of our existing product. It pales in comparison to that."

"Avi Networks Software Load Balancer needs to improve its documentation."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"In terms of improvement, the pricing and documentation need improvement. We have had problems getting the documents."

"IDS and IPS sites need to be more progressive."

"The network analytics and monitoring features are not effective."

"I did not go with it because their APM module is a different product altogether. It's a common thing that companies do. They sell something and then they add on top of it as a different product. It is a type of marketing strategy. But when it comes to the overall management, it takes a lot of time to really look into it."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is harder to manage than Imperva. It is not intuitive and stable compared to other products."

"I want the solution's support to improve. The tool is also expensive."

"In the next release, the solution could improve the integration with Service Mesh and other Azure Security Services."

"One of the challenges we faced was the solution does not support any other PCP protocols apart from HTTP and HTTPS."

"The solution is easy to use overall, but the dashboard could be updated with a better layout and graphical design so that we can see the data a bit easier. Microsoft could also add more documentation. The documentation Microsoft provides doesn't tell us about resource requirements. We found that the instances we had weren't sufficient to support the firewall, so we had to increase them."

"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems."

"We have encountered some issues with automatic redirection and cancellation, leading to 502 and 504 gateway errors. So, I experienced some trouble with containers."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"The licensing costs for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer are really variable. The product can be sold from a bandwidth utilization perspective. It can be sold from a per CPU perspective, depending on if you're looking at on-premises or hyperscale environments. Licensing costs vary quite a bit if you're familiar with the AWS Calculator, where you can see that it can widely vary per licensing model. On a scale of one to five, with one being not very good value for the money and five being great, I would rate the pricing for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer a five because its pricing is extremely competitive. Not all features are included with the license, for example, there's single licensing."

"I rate the solution price a four to five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high, since it is an affordable tool."

"With Avi Networks, you can buy a 10-Gig license and, if your primary data center goes down, in the flick of a switch you can move that license to your backup data center and it will generate the traffic... there are a lot of cost-effective measures."

"It is an expensive solution. We have an enterprise agreement, it is monthly."

"The cost is not an issue."

"We use the tool's basic subscription. Its licensing costs are monthly."

"There is a need to pay a fixed price per month to use the product. There are no additional payments to be made to Microsoft apart from the charges paid towards the monthly licensing costs attached to the solution."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being cheap and one being expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced compared to other solutions."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is expensive."

"The price of the solution can be reduced a bit."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Avi Networks Software Load Balancer?

The solution has simplified our network infrastructure management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer?

The tool is expensive. It is not cheap. The product must be cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Avi Networks Software Load Balancer?

The network analytics and monitoring features are not effective. The product does not provide deep troubleshooting features. The solution must provide public IP features. F5 provides such features.

See all answers

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...

See all answers

How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.

See all answers

Comparisons

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Avi Networks Software Load Balancer

Compared 31% of the time

Citrix NetScaler vs Avi Networks Software Load Balancer

Compared 29% of the time

HAProxy vs Avi Networks Software Load Balancer

Compared 10% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Avi Networks Software Load Balancer

Compared 8% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Avi Networks Software Load Balancer

Compared 3% of the time

More Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Competitors

F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Citrix NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

AWS WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer

June 2024

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer report

Download Avi Networks Software Load Balancer product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

June 2024

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report

Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway product report

Also Known As

Avi Software Load Balancer

Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway

Learn More

Avi Networks

Microsoft

Overview

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is an application delivery controller (ADC) platform. The solution provides scalable application delivery across any infrastructure and allows your organization to deliver multi-cloud application services, such as load balancing, autoscaling, application security, container networking, and web application firewall. It is designed with 100% software load balancing to ensure a fast and secure application experience. Additionally, Avi Networks Software Load Balancer offers elasticity and delivers intelligence across any environment.

The Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is unique because

It can scale from 0 to 1 million SSL transactions per second in minutes.
It can achieve 90% faster provisioning and 50% lower TCO than a traditional appliance-based approach.

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Product Highlights

Troubleshoots application issues in less than a minute.
Alerts you of potential risks with SSL certificates and TLS versions used.
End-to-end timing for each transaction to help solve end-user experience issues.

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Features

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Automated application delivery
Seamless integration with the CI/CD
Built-in analytics
End-to-end visibility
Actionable insights
Security
“Network DVR”-like capability to record and replay specific transactions
Google-like search filters transactions based on device, location, errors, etc.

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Avi Networks Software Load Balancer. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Multi-cloud application services: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer provides consistent, enterprise-grade application services, including load balancing, WAF, and container networking across heterogeneous environments. The multi-cloud application services can be deployed on bare metal, VMs, or containers in any data center or public cloud environments.

Faster application provisioning: With this solution, you gain automation with 100% REST APIs and self-service like public cloud.

Better business decisions: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer uses analytics to deliver application insights and help you drive more intelligent decisions.

Containerized applications: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is a proven solution to deploy container-based workloads in production environments using Kubernetes/OpenShift/Tanzu clusters. It includes multi-cluster, multi-site support for containerized applications.

Lower TCO: The solution is 100% software, and does not require any proprietary hardware. In addition, because it offers on-demand autoscaling, there is no over-provisioning. Lastly, point-and-click application troubleshooting means there is no need for a black box.

Software-defined architecture: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is designed with a software-defined architecture with a centralized control plane (Avi Controller) and distributed data plane (Avi Service Engine). Because of this, elastic autoscaling is made easy.

Better end-user visibility: The solution gives you granular visibility into end-user experiences and server response in real time. It also empowers application owners with end-user stats to optimize and improve apps.

Application health score: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer summarizes analytics information into a helpful health score that provides a quick snapshot of the overall applications. The health score it provides is determined by server response time, resource usage, anomalous traffic, and security posture.

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Sample Customers

Palo Alto Networks, DGDean, Swisslos

Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

May 2024

Free Report: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Find out what your peers are saying about Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Avi Networks Software Load Balancer vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.