Cisco Secure Endpoint and Automox are two distinct security solutions competing in the endpoint security market. Users seem to prefer Cisco Secure Endpoint for its extensive protection capabilities, while Automox is praised for its ease of integration and automation.
Features: Cisco Secure Endpoint is valued for its advanced threat detection, endpoint visibility, and malware protection. Automox stands out for its automated patching, cross-platform support, and simplified policy management. Users highlight Automox's automation capabilities as a key differentiator.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Cisco Secure Endpoint could improve in areas like performance impact, complexity, and user interface. Automox needs enhancements in reporting, feature set robustness, and integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Secure Endpoint users find the deployment process intricate yet recognize the responsive customer service. Automox is praised for its straightforward deployment process and excellent support.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Secure Endpoint is perceived as more expensive, justified by its extensive features and protection. Automox offers a compelling ROI with lower upfront costs and efficient scalability. Despite Cisco's higher costs, users believe the features make it worthwhile, while Automox's affordability is a significant advantage.
They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.
Cisco has good technical support, especially considering these are newer solutions compared to traditional routing and switching products.
Cisco Secure Endpoint is definitely scalable.
We have not encountered any problems.
The forensic capabilities need enhancement, especially for deep forensic data collection.
Cisco is aggressive in pricing, making it competitive and sometimes even cheaper than other good products like CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or SentinelOne.
Cisco Secure Endpoint is very good in machine learning, which allows it to secure offline contents even if not connected to the internet.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | 1.5% |
| Automox | 0.3% |
| Other | 98.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.
Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.
Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.
Cisco Secure Endpoint is a comprehensive endpoint security solution that natively includes open and extensible extended detection and response (XDR) and advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities. Secure Endpoint offers relentless breach protection that enables you to be confident, be bold, and be fearless with one of the industry’s most trusted endpoint security solutions. It protects your hybrid workforce, helps you stay resilient, and secures what’s next with simple, comprehensive endpoint security powered by unique insights from 300,000 security customers and deep visibility from the networking leader.
Cisco Secure Endpoint was formerly known as Cisco AMP for Endpoints.
Reviews from Real Users
Cisco Secure Endpoint stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to enable developers to easily secure their endpoints with one single operation using its management console and its advanced alerting techniques.
Tim C., an IT manager at Van Der Meer Consulting, writes, "The solution makes it possible to see a threat once and block it everywhere across all endpoints and the entire security platform. It has the ability to block right down to the file and application level across all devices based on policies, such as, blacklisting and whitelisting of software and applications. This is good. Its strength is the ability to identify threats very quickly, then lock them and the network down and block the threats across the organization and all devices, which is what you want. You don't want to be spending time working out how to block something. You want to block something very quickly, letting that flow through to all the devices and avoiding the same scenario on different operating systems."
Wouter H., a technical team lead network & security at Missing Piece BV, notes, "Any alert that we get is an actionable alert. Immediately, there is information that we can just click through, see the point in time, what happened, what caused it, and what automatic actions were taken. We can then choose to take any manual actions, if we want, or start our investigation. We're no longer looking at digging into information or wading through hundreds of incidents. There's a list which says where the status is assigned, e.g., under investigation or investigation finished. That is all in the console. It has taken away a lot of the administration, which we would normally be doing, and integrated it into the console for us."
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
